• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Illegal Aliens allowed to be cops ?

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,562
13,941
Earth
✟244,055.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
If they were reasonable, they would be in the center, and not left-biased.
There are overlapping issues in the political zeitgeist, we’re more liberal on some issues, and we’re more conservative in others. And it’s always been this way, as our collective society struggles its merry path through history.
Who wants to live in times that are going to be the Big, Important Things-to-remember-about “how we got to where we are”, when they carve them on the slabs?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Nithavela

you're in charge you can do it just get louis
Apr 14, 2007
30,674
22,316
Comb. Pizza Hut and Taco Bell/Jamaica Avenue.
✟590,141.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
  • Agree
Reactions: KCfromNC
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
NBC skews a bit left, but AP is what I would consider to be centrist...not sure why they'd be claiming that the AP is a leftist organization (unless they see "leftist" as "anything left of center-right")
It's a common error on the part of many on the right to incorrectly refer to anything left of center as "leftist".
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Apparently also in the minds of those who study such things.
What a fascinating response. I don't see anything in either of those ratings indicating that NBC or the AP are "leftist" organizations. Do you even know the word leftist means?
Any other questions?
Maybe, instead of being so smug, you should have consulted a dictionary.
2. ADJECTIVE [ADJECTIVE noun]
If you describe someone, their ideals, or their activities as leftist, you mean that they support the ideas of socialism or communism.

So my question is, on what planet are for profit news agencies communist organizations?
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
27,533
19,222
Colorado
✟537,820.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
....
There are people on the left.....
....
Of course there are. As always.

My point is about about madness thats getting mainstreamed and is genuinely destructive

Defund the police? Come on. That was a flash in the pan. The center left considered it for a minute and then thought better.

No nukes? Youre too young to be stuck in the 80's. The center has come around quite a lot in the last decade or so. Why? because of reality based considerations. (Will they be nimby about it? Of course, Just like people on the right will be. If theres one thing that can unite left and right, its nimby.)

Trans athletes? We're going to get through that and everyone will be just fine once the dust settles.

Now I made a point of highlighting some really destructive directions the mainstream right is headed right now. Most of them, I think, spiral out from their truly disturbing divorce from actual reality. You seem too smart to be bringing us tales of far left climate protesters gluing their hands to stuff while the center right including actual leaders in congress cant even get their heads free of Tucker Carlson epistemology. Get some perspective man!
 
Upvote 0

IceJad

Regular Member
May 23, 2005
2,146
1,448
42
✟136,761.00
Country
Malaysia
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single

"Just In: Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker has signed a law that will allow illegal immigrants to become police officers and sheriffs deputies. In Illinois American citizens will be arrested by illegals.

Once this takes effect, people who are actively breaking federal law will be arresting Americans if they break they law. This madness from the democrat party is absolutely out of control."

Is anyone actually ok with this?

I believe that law is non-citizen are allowed to be police however there must be a proper working visa. So illegals are not allowed.

That being said I still think it is a risk to security. In the event of conflict between the nations, where will their loyalty be? Job or nation? And if that nation requested them to fulfill their national duty to sabotage the host nation what can you do?

Even naturalized citizen poses a potential risk what more a non-citizen. While the case is dropped, you can see the level of breach they can do.

 
Upvote 0

Arcangl86

Newbie
Dec 29, 2013
12,104
8,351
✟412,453.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
I believe that law is non-citizen are allowed to be police however there must be a proper working visa. So illegals are not allowed.

That being said I still think it is a risk to security. In the event of conflict between the nations, where will their loyalty be? Job or nation? And if that nation requested them to fulfill their national duty to sabotage the host nation what can you do?
The combination of factors pretty much requires that the only people eligible for this would be permanent residents or people on immigration visas. Those are people who have chosen to make the US their home. Incidentally, the military has the same requirements. If it's not a national security issue there, I doubt the local sheriff's deputy would be one.
Even naturalized citizen poses a potential risk what more a non-citizen. While the case is dropped, you can see the level of breach they can do.

Examples like Kim Philby, the Rosenbergs, Robert Hansenn, Anatoliy Mikhaylovich Golitsyn would argue against that. All incredibly damaging foreign agents, and all native born citizens of the countries they spied on. In fact I would argue that naturalized citizens are less likely to turn traitor because they voluntarily chose to become part of a certain country rather then an accident of birth.
 
Upvote 0

IceJad

Regular Member
May 23, 2005
2,146
1,448
42
✟136,761.00
Country
Malaysia
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Examples like Kim Philby, the Rosenbergs, Robert Hansenn, Anatoliy Mikhaylovich Golitsyn would argue against that. All incredibly damaging foreign agents, and all native born citizens of the countries they spied on. In fact I would argue that naturalized citizens are less likely to turn traitor because they voluntarily chose to become part of a certain country rather then an accident of birth.

Depends on what their initial intentions are when naturalizing. Some come because they love the nation, some come because they love their home nation and intended to become a mole. You can't just say they are less likely. In the field of national security caution should override compassion.


In the event you're wrong because of a single compassion the consequences are deadly. Like my country you must be a citizen before you're allowed to even apply for a law enforcement position.
 
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,044
7,502
61
Montgomery
✟254,207.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Really?





The decades predicted police shortage issue.....first time I've heard of it.



Ironically, it's costing more money to have less police, and they're less effective because they're overworked. It doesn't help that these woke DAs like Foxx, Bragg, Gaston, and others seem more interested in helping criminals than in helping victims.

What's the decades old police shortage issue?
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
That being said I still think it is a risk to security. In the event of conflict between the nations, where will their loyalty be?
This is the same argument used to put Japanese Americans in interment camps during WW2.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,562
13,941
Earth
✟244,055.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
This is the same argument used to put Japanese Americans in interment camps during WW2.
Fun fact: the Marx Brothers were billed as a German act on the vaudeville circuit, until WWI when they suddenly became a “Yiddish” comedy troupe.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: wing2000
Upvote 0

Tropical Wilds

Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Oct 2, 2009
6,764
4,880
New England
✟260,402.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I believe that law is non-citizen are allowed to be police however there must be a proper working visa. So illegals are not allowed.

That being said I still think it is a risk to security. In the event of conflict between the nations, where will their loyalty be? Job or nation? And if that nation requested them to fulfill their national duty to sabotage the host nation what can you do?

Even naturalized citizen poses a potential risk what more a non-citizen. While the case is dropped, you can see the level of breach they can do.


In the event of a conflict between nations, they won’t be calling municipal police to solve it. And since all of those demographics can serve in the military, I don’t see why they wouldn’t be able to serve local law enforcement. My 100% German grandfather was able to serve in the US military during WWII despite being a German citizen who was in the country under a sponsorship and as a refugee (his family was caught hiding people from the Nazis), so…
 
  • Like
Reactions: john23237
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,187
17,026
Here
✟1,467,125.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Now I made a point of highlighting some really destructive directions the mainstream right is headed right now. Most of them, I think, spiral out from their truly disturbing divorce from actual reality. You seem too smart to be bringing us tales of far left climate protesters gluing their hands to stuff while the center right including actual leaders in congress cant even get their heads free of Tucker Carlson epistemology. Get some perspective man!
The climate protestors gluing themselves aren't the counterpart to people spreading the election lie, they're more like the left wing equivalent of the people who were tea party types when that was a thing.

The kind of political violence you were describing from the right's proper counterpart would be the actions that some of the 2020 protests devolved into. Or perhaps incidents like Chaz/Chop.

No nukes? Youre too young to be stuck in the 80's. The center has come around quite a lot in the last decade or so. Why? because of reality based considerations. (Will they be nimby about it? Of course, Just like people on the right will be. If theres one thing that can unite left and right, its nimby.)

Only 39% of democrats support nuclear energy at the moment.

And actually, it's been within the last few years or so that many progressive Euro countries have actually been shutting down reactors as part of a nuclear power phase-out plan.

As of 2016, countries including Australia, Austria, Denmark, Ireland, Italy, Estonia, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Malta, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal and Serbia have no nuclear power stations and remain opposed to nuclear power.[9][10] Germany, Spain and Switzerland plan nuclear phase-outs by 2030.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
42,841
13,602
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟872,856.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Reasonable would be reality-centered.

But from time to time the left or the right - or sometimes both - depart from reality. We're in a time now when the right has made the biggest swerve toward fantasy.
Having law enforcement done by those who aren't law-breakers by being in the country is quite a fantasy that used to be reality.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
42,841
13,602
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟872,856.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
What a fascinating response. I don't see anything in either of those ratings indicating that NBC or the AP are "leftist" organizations. Do you even know the word leftist means?

Maybe, instead of being so smug, you should have consulted a dictionary.
2. ADJECTIVE [ADJECTIVE noun]
If you describe someone, their ideals, or their activities as leftist, you mean that they support the ideas of socialism or communism.

So my question is, on what planet are for profit news agencies communist organizations?
Whichever planets (or countries) adopt socialism and communism. Currently, that would involve large portions of the United States, including many segments within its society; larger cities being prime examples.
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
27,533
19,222
Colorado
✟537,820.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Having law enforcement done by those who aren't law-breakers by being in the country is quite a fantasy that used to be reality.
Is it?

Who is proposing undocumented people should be cops? Youre giving us an object lesson in the point I was making. See below:

Per the bill:

…an individual who is not a citizen but is legally authorized to work in the United States under federal law is authorized to apply for the position of police officer, subject to all requirements and limitations, other than citizenship, to which other applicants are subject.
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,246
15,903
72
Bondi
✟375,107.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Whichever planets (or countries) adopt socialism and communism. Currently, that would involve large portions of the United States, including many segments within its society; larger cities being prime examples.
Which cities are promoting the social ownership of the means of production?
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

Called it...

The bill comes as Illinois grapples with statewide police shortages amid recruitment and retention challenges. In March 2022, Chicago Police Department staffing numbers reached the lowest in recent history, causing the department to loosen its recruitment requirements by waiving the minimum 60 college credits for certain candidates and offering online testing opportunities.
This is what happens when you destroy police departments.
1. They aren't handing out work visas to be police if it's against federal law for foreign nationals to be police.
2. This will only apply to legal permanent residents. It's not a super common status and frankly, I doubt anyone who has been here long enough to be a permanent resident is going to be dumb enough to apply to be a cop. If they do...I think residents should worry more about the police showing up than arresting anyone.



 
Upvote 0

IceJad

Regular Member
May 23, 2005
2,146
1,448
42
✟136,761.00
Country
Malaysia
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
In the event of a conflict between nations, they won’t be calling municipal police to solve it. And since all of those demographics can serve in the military, I don’t see why they wouldn’t be able to serve local law enforcement. My 100% German grandfather was able to serve in the US military during WWII despite being a German citizen who was in the country under a sponsorship and as a refugee (his family was caught hiding people from the Nazis), so…

Yes municipal police will not solve conflicts between nations but as a citizen of another nation they have a national duty to assist their home nation in the event of a conflict. They may not need to fight in the front lines but they can do other things like espionage, fermenting local dissent or recruiting spies. And given that they are allowed to work in the police, will grant them higher access to information not available to the general public.

Security is a game of risk whether you like it or not. If you are will to risk it then risk it. I personally think it is an unjustifiable risk to take. A risk simply means the possibility of danger. It might happen or it might not happen. But when it happens you just need to face the consequences.

BTW your grandfather was given an exception because of exceptional circumstances. Nations take higher risks during crisis like how Ukraine now allows foreign fighters to fight on their behalf. Under normal conditions Ukraine wouldn't allow an other nationalities roaming their borders acting like enforcement.
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I believe that law is non-citizen are allowed to be police however there must be a proper working visa.

If you're not aware of how working visas are handed out....they're handed out according to the work you've applied to do. It's not just a visa that's for any job any time...

If federal law prevents non-citizens from being police or law enforcement, then there won't be any "police visas" created.
 
Upvote 0