God in our own image, this is a declaration of the Incarnation of God Himself. Can this be abused just like Scripture - absolutely, without a doubt, it can and is, but that doesn't mean it must. Just like Scripture, the foundation must be sound in order for the walls to stand.
So true - but truthfully, for many Protestants railing against any use of icons depicting Christ, I wonder how far are we willing to go.
For many say they're against icons - and yet they allow for presentations of the Lord to occur in smaller ways - and it makes you wonder on the issue of Bible stories made in movies/media--be it "The Passion" on the suffering of Christ or "The Nativity Story" in regards to the birth of Christ or other films dealing with Biblical history. Personally, although they can never have it fully accurate as to how things exactly were, I'm thankful for many of those films that have caused others to study on the life of the Messiah and seeing what the scriptures have to say.....and that is also said in light of the many children's church stories utilizing pictures to show the Messiah.
Love it when the saints do things such as sacred artwork in showing what the Scriptures beautifully demonstrate for the saints to see---regarding the many ways in which the Lord has shown Himself. It is indeed a blessing....and something I think is beneficial when it comes to aiding via illustration with the scriptures. Of course, it does not include much of the NT---though what it had to offer was indeed a gem...& of course, plenty of others out there on the issue that one could look into.
Same with other venues utilizing the medium of art when it comes to the Scriptures for portrayal. There's one film I know of which is a clay-animation film on the account of the Exodus---known as "The 10 Commandments":
The Ten Commandments
The stories of the Exodus's accounts are truly some of the most beautiful mentioned in the Scriptures...and seeing them on flim are always a blessing. The Burning Bush has always stood out to me. The film known as "The Prince Of Egypt" was one of my favorites when it came to bringing the Exodus Account to life...especially on that part, as seen in:
But if all depictions of the Lord are sin, then how to go about it?
I've often had to do- a LOT of battle with people when they felt kids were promoted "idolatry" simply for imagining what Christ looked like if it wasn't exactly the way it was in history - ironically for saying that there was nothing wrong with depicting Christ in Afro-Centric terms like it is in many churches ( More was shared on that in #
1, #
39 and
here ) - and I've often had ALOT of issue with when it comes to many being offended that Christ was not portrayed as a European-looking individual with blone hair and blue eyes and a Halo around his head when it comes to iconography or images of the Lord....much of it being cultural, due to what occured over the centuries when EuroCentric thought dominated everything and others were trained to think that all other ethnicities were inferior---especially those who happened to be of darker complexion. I crack up still whenever I come across others shocked to see that Jews have been of Ethopian background, Indian, Asian and many other cultures...for in their mind, "Jesus was White!!!!" based on what they saw in the media.
The same goes for depictions of Christ or others as being weak-or depictions being made where others act dogmatically about it when the truth is that no one was fully there in the times of the scriptures...and thus, no one will ever truly know.
Others may disagree, but I think people relate by using their senses and visual representations of Christ, etc. are just an effort to reach people, entirely innocuous. Like it or not, we ALL Have Mental images of Christ that comes to mind when thinking of Him, and those images were influenced by something we either saw in a painting at service, childrens church, or even a Christian movie
and that image, though perhaps close, may not be 100% accurate, but God still worked it for good
.and that mental image was a part of connecting with the Lord as we sought to relate to Him, for using ones imagination is a part of learning timeless truths, whether it be imagining the landscape of a biblical location when studying Biblical history, or imagining the look of the Burning Bush or Transfiguration of Christ bit by bit
..
Unless it hindered us in obeying Him or caused us to promote something like heresy, wheres the real issue?
Regardless of the color/shades, The Gospel Messages still the same.
Being a Child worker, I see this all the time whenever the children do crafts. Some wish to color Jesus as white, others as brown, and some even green.
However, therere no benefits in being vexed about it since the children are being taught EXTENSIVELY on whom Christ was (i.e. His Divinity, message, mission, etc), sins ugliness, n the need for His Redemption/Lordship for our lives. Additionally, its encouraging to witness their growth in Love for Him.
Moreover, theyll eventually square with His LITERAL APPEARANCE in time---which was a Hebraic/Middle Eastern Jewish man (though appearances can be similar to some things...especially in light of the reality of Ethiopian Jews and other similar groups), so why become indignant on the issue?
How would it look if 5 yr old Chang depicted Jesus Yellow n with slanted eyes, despite Jesus not LITERALY appearing as such and despite how Johnny earnestly seeks God, and I stopped him in class claiming BAD JOHNNY!!! THATS NOT CHRISTS APPEARANCE
.IDOLATRY!!!!?
Why would I belittle the importance of thirsting to be more like Christ n place more emphasis on KNOWING HIS EXTERNAL attributes rather than the ESSENCE of who He WAS?
Regarding idolatry, I believe the command was more than making images of gods
. Specifically, it was the importance of not BOWING DOWN IN WORSHIP OF THEM (
Exodus 20:4-5).
Images ALONE were not what constituted idolatry, but WORSHIP/Insistence of them as God.
In Israels time, worshiping various statues/carvings was very popular
.Pagan nations attributed all kinds of miracles/powers to them
.BUT JEHOVAH was to be Distinct, not simply seen as another idol/statue made by man
Thus, He forbade them from trying.
That said, it seems imagery of Christ would qualify as idolatry if one were to worship that image, as if the image BY ITSELF CONTAINTED Power (i.e. thinking a depiction one made is THE real depiction of the Lord and therefore should be REVERED).
Moreover, the Idol part would seem to be the insistence of Him ONLY being of one race, refusing to ever research/acknowledge His actual ethnicity.
Considering differing depictions of Christ ALONE as idolatry seems EXTREME, as it implies all art forms (ex. the timeless illustrations of Christ from the Renaissance, to crafts/artworks of Him at Christian Bookstores, and movie portrayals like The Passion) are condemned,
.