Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well, their chips run faster and cooler than Intel's P4s which are still their flagship processor until the Core 2 Duo is released. But yeah, they're going to do to AMD what AMD did to them 2 years ago.Willtor said:That's my point. Not that there hasn't been competition, but that competition has been declining significantly. Apple's switch to Intel, was an immediate transition of some 7%(?) of the whole PC market. With all this Core Duo stuff, AMD is having a hard time keeping up. Their chips run slower and hotter. They're cheaper, to be sure, but can they keep up like this?
twistedsketch said:Wow, the worst of both worlds. I took a look at some other Object Desktop programs and made a note not to download this one.
Oh please. The Mac would keep its ground, fight back against the killer IBM clones...and win.Macrina said:This thread title makes me think of some B-movie horror flick. Watch out! The ship from Neptune just landed! The killer IBM clones are after me with their brain-sucking lasers! Help help!
*Mac runs away shrieking*
Have you seen the performance previews of a Core 2 Duo (Conroe) vs. an overclocked Athlon 64 FX 60?
You should hope so, since it certainly can't run awayAceHero said:Oh please. The Mac would keep its ground, fight back against the killer IBM clones...and win.![]()
And I'm going to get a peecee just because it's a tad bit faster than my Mac? I think not. Benchmarks are benchmarks, just like in cars. If I'm reading a car magazine and during a road test and one car get from 0 to 60 mph in a few seconds less than the other, will that persuade me to buy it solely for that reason? I think not.Grunt said:You should hope so, since it certainly can't run awayAceHero said:Oh please. The Mac would keep its ground, fight back against the killer IBM clones...and win.![]()
http://sekhon.berkeley.edu/macosx/intel.html
Macrina said:This thread title makes me think of some B-movie horror flick. Watch out! The ship from Neptune just landed! The killer IBM clones are after me with their brain-sucking lasers! Help help!
*Mac runs away shrieking*
AceHero said:Oh please. The Mac would keep its ground, fight back against the killer IBM clones...and win.![]()
Right, but they'll have to switch to a new socket for that AGAIN.Grunt said:Ah, that good 'ol test. Thanks, but I'll wait until they're testing the product that's on the shelf.
As I've said all along AM2 is just a stepping stone for AMD to jump to DDR3 and make more major revisions to the architecture. You'd have to be foolish anyway to expect a simple memory change to give some magical performance boost, especially when K8 isn't starved for bandwidth.
I never thought of that...renaistre said:Hehe, does "The Mac" refer to a computer made by Apple, or to Macrina? Or is it a clever pun that means both?AceHero said:h please. The Mac would keep its ground, fight back against the killer IBM clones...and win.![]()
Macs (not MACS, thank you) have most of the same games as are available for the PC. The odd thing is that most major ones may come out six months or more for the Mac after the PC. But patience pays out in the end. I'd rather wait for the games to come out while using a superior computer than have the games immediately while realizing I'm using a inferior one.silentpoet said:The real issue is the software. Who wants to run an admittedly decent computer without cool games. Either will do the simple office tasks I do, but without the same game selection MACs would not be much of an option. If I were going to go without games as much I would run linux again.