Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why would you think Jesus as the prince (King) of the Romans ?One consistent Prince all the way through - Christ Jesus the promised Messiah for the restoration of David's throne....and salvation for the whole world.
That's backwards.Why would you think Jesus as the prince (King) of the Romans ?
But Jesus was not the prince (king) of the Roman Soldiers. That prince is future from the Romans.That's backwards.
"The people (the soldiers) of the prince (ChristJesus)".....came to destroy. I believe the Roman soldiers were used by God to fulfill His will.
Zech. 14:1-5
Then the Lord will go out and fight against those nations as when He fights on a day of battle… And you shall flee to the valley of My mountains, for the valley of the mountains shall reach to Azal. And you shall flee as you fled from the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah. Then the Lord My God will come, and all the holy ones with Him
That's apocalyptic language that runs all throughout the Old Testament.mkgal1, the mount of Olives has not been split in half yet.
Not ordinarily, that's true (Jesus wasn't their prince). But God used them to achieve His will.But Jesus was not the prince (king) of the Roman Soldiers.
Zechariah 14:3 is plainly worded language of an event that can and will happen when Jesus Returns.That's apocalyptic language that runs all throughout the Old Testament.
mkgal1, Jesus left this world from the Mt. of Olives, ascending out of sight as the disciples looked on into a cloud.So in Zech. 14:4-5, the obstacle that opposed the Church would be shattered and overcome by a great valley that would extend to the other side of the obstacle. This is why Zechariah mentioned "the Mount of Olives" by name. That mountain stood in front of the City of Jerusalem, in the path of any who would flee directly to the East away from the City. The Mount of Olives thus served as a physical symbol of a spiritual obstacle or barrier, because of its location in front of Jerusalem.
But God is not the prince who shall come. We have to nail down who that prince who shall come is in relation to Jerusalem Israel.Not ordinarily, that's true (Jesus wasn't their prince). But God used them to achieve His will.
Titus reportedly refused to accept a wreath of victory, as he claimed that he had not won the victory on his own, but had been the vehicle through which their God had manifested his wrath against his people."
- "Titus - Wikipedia" Titus - Wikipedia
But God is not the prince who shall come. We have to nail down who that prince who shall come is in relation to Jerusalem Israel.
In Daniel 8:9 referring to the little horn....
9 And out of one of them came forth a little horn, which waxed exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant land.
No, we don't *know* that. That is one interpretation. We know He would return "in like manner" - but all we can do is interpret what was meant by that.mkgal1, Jesus left this world from the Mt. of Olives, ascending out of sight as the disciples looked on into a cloud.
The two angels told them Jesus would return in like manner.
From that we can know the splitting of the Mt. of Olives with be literal and not metaphoric.
Christ Jesus, the Son of Man (i believe) was the Messiah prince who came in 26/27 AD to preach to the lost (fulfilling the Messianic prophecies...right on time).....and then returned in judgment (by using the soldiers as His agents of destruction of the city of Jerusalem and the temple in 70 AD). The word "coming" in the Hebrew Scriptures isn't a literal manifestation of God - it refers to His judgment.But God is not the prince who shall come. We have to nail down who that prince who shall come is in relation to Jerusalem Israel.
Why are you connecting this to the Messiah in Daniel 9?
I am connecting Daniel 8:9 to the prince who shall come - who is not the messiah, or at least not the true messiah.Why are you connecting this to the Messiah in Daniel 9?
simplify in your own words. I don't want to wade through all that. And I think most others here will not as well.Commentaries on Daniel 9:
Quote: the people of a prince that shall come] viz. against the land, the verb being used in the same hostile sense which it has in Daniel 1:1, Daniel 11:13; Daniel 11:16; Daniel 11:21; Daniel 11:40-41. The allusion is to the soldiery of Antiochus Epiphanes, who set Jerusalem on fire, and pulled down many of the houses and fortifications, so that the inhabitants took flight, and the city could be described as being ‘without inhabitant, like a wilderness’ (1Ma 1:31-32; 1Ma 1:38; 1Ma 3:45)—‘people’ being used as in 2 Samuel 10:13, Ezekiel 30:11, &c., of a body of troops. On the treatment which the Temple received at the same time, see above on Daniel 8:11.
Daniel 9:26 Commentaries: "Then after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah will be cut off and have nothing, and the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. And its end will come with a flood; even to the end there will be war; desolations are determined.
I'm not very adept at using my Adobe Illustrator application, so I will present a vertical timeline of fulfillments to prophecies as I see them.To very active posters at this forum,
What I want to see from you, is not just your verbiage of your eschatology view. I want to see a timeline chart of the elements of your eschatology position.
What you should do is make a timeline chart of all your iterations, fitting everything you have been writing about and claiming, and putting it into a non-fragmented form of a timeline chart. To show how any of it makes sense.
Start a timeline chart.... and work on it, until the contradictions are ironed out. it will probably be an ongoing work in progress.
Here is mine....which most of you have seen over and over. You make yours - prove your views, interpretations, and claims, fit together to form the big picture.
View attachment 279325
Six Seals (Rev. 6:1-17): AD 98–395To very active posters at this forum,
What I want to see from you, is not just your verbiage of your eschatology view. I want to see a timeline chart of the elements of your eschatology position.
What you should do is make a timeline chart of all your iterations, fitting everything you have been writing about and claiming, and putting it into a non-fragmented form of a timeline chart. To show how any of it makes sense.
Start a timeline chart.... and work on it, until the contradictions are ironed out. it will probably be an ongoing work in progress.
Here is mine....which most of you have seen over and over. You make yours - prove your views, interpretations, and claims, fit together to form the big picture.
View attachment 279325
Revelation 12 Sign (Rev. 12:1–17)To very active posters at this forum,
What I want to see from you, is not just your verbiage of your eschatology view. I want to see a timeline chart of the elements of your eschatology position.
What you should do is make a timeline chart of all your iterations, fitting everything you have been writing about and claiming, and putting it into a non-fragmented form of a timeline chart. To show how any of it makes sense.
Start a timeline chart.... and work on it, until the contradictions are ironed out. it will probably be an ongoing work in progress.
Here is mine....which most of you have seen over and over. You make yours - prove your views, interpretations, and claims, fit together to form the big picture.
View attachment 279325
s and go to destruction/eighth king
Seven Heads (Kings) (Rev. 13:1–10; 17:10)
1. Victor Emmanuel I (1802–1821)
2. Charles Felix (1821–1831)
3. Charles Albert (1831–1849)
4. Victor Emmanuel II (1849–1878)
5. Umberto I (1878–1900)
6. Victor Emmanuel III (1900–1946)
7. Umberto II (1946)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?