Humans did NOT evolve from Apes...

[Aman777]

Non sequitur. Let's try to avoid those too in the future.

Speak for yourself. I live to praise Jesus and you call Him a non sequitur. Such as you run around the Judgment insisting that they were Creationists.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Speak for yourself. I live to praise Jesus and you call Him a non sequitur. Such as you run around the Judgment insisting that they were Creationists.

Go back and read the post that you responded to. And you are not being honest. I did not call Jesus a non sequitur, your post was one. Are you Jesus?

 

[miknik5]

Then you must believe that Adam, Abel, Moses, Abraham and David were lost? Do you see them in Hell?

No I believe Peter 3:19

 

[miknik5]

Sure. Adam was formed physically before the plants herbs rain and trees, which GREW on the 3rd Day. Gen 2:4-9
Adam was created by the Trinity (God) on the 6th Day. Gen 1:27 and Gen 5:1-2

Here's the problem with your thinking. Eve was ALSO created by the Trinity (God) on the 6th Day AND Eve was made physically from Adam's rib on the 6th Day. Gen 2:22 IOW, Both Adam and Eve were created by the Trinity at the SAME time. Gen 1:27 and Gen 5:1-2 Now, you have TWO sets of born again people. God Bless you

Which Adam?

The one without Eve
Or the one with Eve

 

[miknik5]

Sure. Adam was formed physically before the plants herbs rain and trees, which GREW on the 3rd Day. Gen 2:4-9
Adam was created by the Trinity (God) on the 6th Day. Gen 1:27 and Gen 5:1-2

Here's the problem with your thinking. Eve was ALSO created by the Trinity (God) on the 6th Day AND Eve was made physically from Adam's rib on the 6th Day. Gen 2:22 IOW, Both Adam and Eve were created by the Trinity at the SAME time. Gen 1:27 and Gen 5:1-2 Now, you have TWO sets of born again people. God Bless you

You added to the scriptures

I perceive that you separate Genesis 1 from Genesis 3


In the first account there is NO mention of Eve taken out from the ONE MAN ADAM

 

[Subduction Zone]

Which Adam?

The one without Eve
Or the one with Eve

And I will remind you again that there was no "Adam". At no point in human history were there ever only one man and one woman.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You added to the scriptures

I perceive that you separate Genesis 1 from Genesis 3


In the first account there is NO mention of Eve

Well you can't expect the Bible to be consistent. That is why people like you and Aman can disagree. You each pull verses out of context. Sometimes even in context the Bible contradicts itself.

 

[miknik5]

Well you can't expect the Bible to be consistent. That is why people like you and Aman can disagree. You each pull verses out of context. Sometimes even in context the Bible contradicts itself.

There's only ONE TRURH


There is a reason why in Genesis 3 GOD clearly shows that out of man came his helpmate


HE didn't create man and woman separate from each other like the other lower created animals because HE was showing something higher

A higher truth in that we are not all in the same likeness and we can't ensure "fruit with seed in it according to our likeness" of any of our offspring

Adam couldn't

 

[miknik5]

Adam was the pattern of THE LAST ADAM who is Christ

 

[Subduction Zone]

There's only ONE TRURH


There is a reason why in Genesis 3 GOD clearly shows that out of man came his helpmate


HE didn't create man and woman separate from each other like the other lower created animals because HE was showing something higher

A higher truth in that we are not all in the same likeness and we can't ensure "fruit with seed in it" of all our offspring

But the Bible is not reliable as "ONE TRURH". Genesis is simply allegory at best. It is not meant to be taken literally.

 

[miknik5]

What was taken out from Adam is being put back in the ONE BODY of CHRIST and is reborn of the JMPERISHABLE SEED a NEW CREATION in CHRIST

 

[miknik5]

But the Bible is not reliable as "ONE TRURH". Genesis is simply allegory at best. It is not meant to be taken literally.

Stop it...it's a typo


And yes it is
If one is born of HIS SPIRIT one sees CHRIST throughout THE WORD

And no

Genesis is not allegory at all

GOD scattered but HE will gather up in ONE a set apart people called by HIS NAME


GOD always makes a distinction between the flocks

It's HIS CALL and work

 

[AV1611VET]

At no point in human history were there ever only one man and one woman.

Was there a point in human history where there was no man and no woman?

 

[miknik5]

There was a first man
And no matter how perfect and full his immediate relationship with GOD could have been, it isn't good for man to be alone

Eve, taken from Adam was bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh

But spirit of his spirit?

No

None are

Only CHRIST is the visible image of the invisible GOD made manifest

 

[Subduction Zone]

Stop it...it's a typo


And yes it is
If one is born of HIS SPIRIT one sees CHRIST throughout THE WORD

And no

Genesis is not allegory at all

GOD scattered but HE will gather up in ONE a set apart people called by HIS NAME


GOD always makes a distinction between the flocks

It's HIS CALL and work

When you abuse all caps you are basically begging for that.

If Genesis is not allegory then the burden of proof is upon you. I can show you why we know that it is mere allegory at best.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Was there a point in human history where there was no man and no woman?

I should have said the history of the Earth. So technically no, at no point in man's history was there no man and no woman. But my claim still stands, at no point in man's history were there only one man and one woman. I know you hate the fact that we are the product of evolution, but that's life. And populations evolve. When a population gets down to two extinction is all but guaranteed.

 

[miknik5]

When you abuse all caps you are basically begging for that.

If Genesis is not allegory then the burden of proof is upon you. I can show you why we know that it is mere allegory at best.

No
The burden of proof is yours

Be a Berean

There are two testimonies being given in the world

Only one will be right

 

[Cearbhall]

No
The burden of proof is yours

Be a Berean

There are two testimonies being given in the world

Only one will be right

How old are you?

 

[miknik5]

I should have said the history of the Earth. So technically no, at no point in man's history was there no man and no woman. But my claim still stands, at no point in man's history were there only one man and one woman. I know you hate the fact that we are the product of evolution, but that's life. And populations evolve. When a population gets down to two extinction is all but guaranteed.

Like I said there is only ONE TRUTH

 

[miknik5]

How old are you?

LOL
Older than I seem

Believe me I know

Both physically and well ______yeah

But what can I say
HE made me just the way I was supposed to be