The point was that consciousness makes a difference as far as reality is concerned. If consciousness is a form of field that can interact with the physical world (particles and fields) then a universe with consciousness will have this additional aspect of reality.
If you think that consciousness is real, then
whatever it is, a universe with consciousness will have it as an additional aspect of reality compared to a universe without it. Why do you think it makes a difference if it's a 'form of field' - and if you don't, why mention it?
I did ask you (months ago) to define what you mean by 'reality', but I don't recall that you ever did... Just for the record, what do you mean by 'reality', i.e. what is its ontology for you?
I think that conscious life is an inevitable result of the cosmos. The parameters for conscious life were there from the beginning.
Obviously, conscious life is an inherent possibility of our universe - because here we are! But that doesn't mean conscious life was
inevitable.
This can be seen in the finely tuned constants for intelligent life (Anthropic Principle) as opposed to the Cosmological Principle.
The 'fine tuning' of constants is not the Anthropic Principle, and neither has anything to do with the Cosmological Principle.
It also depends on what interpretation you take with QM such as QBism as opposed to the Many Worlds interpretation.
Does it? - how?
That's all we have so our experience of a universe without consciousness is our present experiences of imagining that scenario.
As before, that's not a logical possibility - the best you can do is to imagine the experience of being in a universe where you're the
only conscious entity.
By the same token we can also know about our present experiences and realize a world without them and though we have not experienced a universe without consciousness we know that something great would be lost. For me that's enough to show that consciousness is something relevant to and beyond physical reality.
A universe that has never had consciousness in it wouldn't
lose anything - any more than humans have '
lost something great' because we can't fly. We can wish we had the ability to fly; but in a universe without consciousness, there's no one to miss it or wish for it, the concept doesn't exist.
Explain how your opinion that a universe without consciousness would have lost 'something great'
shows that consciousness '
is something relevant to and beyond physical reality'. It's a non-sequitur.
I think if we had to choose we would choose a universe with consciousness even without knowing what the difference is.
You
know the difference - it's between being conscious and not being conscious - but you can't
experience the difference. Unless you're suicidal, you'll obviously choose to continue being conscious.
I think we can intuit that consciousness is not just an accident caused by the cosmos but is a part of the cosmos. I guess that sums up consciousness for many if not the majority.
Who thinks consciousness
isn't part of the cosmos? Some think that consciousness is a kind of 'illusion', or something similar, but I suspect even they would concede that it's an illusion that
exists...