How to choose between creation and evolution.

[AV1611VET]

And if it's the other way around?

Then it's the other way around.

 

[AV1611VET]

The problem is that AV1611VET believes in an inherently deceptive universe. At which point all bets are off.

Have you seen my raisin bread challenge?

 

[AV1611VET]

You do realize that tare is an old fashioned word for weeds and the official definition of a weed is a plant growing where you don’t want it.

A tare is a weed that looks very much like wheat.

Matthew 13:24 Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field:
25 But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.
26 But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.

 

[Subduction Zone]

If you think creationism can be tested, I have a wheat farm in Antarctica I'd like to sell you.

Of course it can be tested. You don't like the tests because they demonstrate that it is a failed idea. This is why others point out that creationists have to believe in a god that lies since their excuses for what we can observe eventually amount to that. If God can't lie then then Genesis cannot be read literally.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Have you seen my raisin bread challenge?

Yes, we have all seen your failed challenges. Your challenges merely underline an inability to reason rationally. They are monuments to your failures.

 

[AV1611VET]

Of course it can be tested.

Here we go with the he-sad/she-said again.

Forgive me if I don't respond to this.

 

[AV1611VET]

Yes,

Good, then he should know why I think he's wrong.

 

[pitabread]

Have you seen my raisin bread challenge?

I have no interest in your 'challenge' threads.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Here we go with the he-sad/she-said again.

Forgive me if I don't respond to this.

Why do you think that it can't be tested? Are you simply going to change your claims every time that you are shown to be wrong? That is the typical creationist two step. I have seen many creationists make the mistake of thinking that just because they can't test an idea that no one can test an idea. That is usually an incorrect assumption to make.

 

[pitabread]

Then it's the other way around.

Which means you would be the one sowing tares.

 

[AV1611VET]

I have no interest in your 'challenge' threads.

Then why did you read it?

 

[AV1611VET]

Why do you think that it can't be tested?

What was it you tested? ion trail? plasma cloud? time crystals? microwave background? what exactly?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Good, then he should know why I think he's wrong.

I would suggest that you drop your challenges. They do not help your claims one iota. Why even participate in this part of the forum when almost all of your posts make creationism look like a rather sad and ignorant belief. If you are a champion of creationism you are not going at it properly. But then no one that I have ever seen has been able to properly support the creationism side.

 

[AV1611VET]

Which means you would be the one sowing tares.

That's right!

 

[AV1611VET]

I would suggest that you drop your challenges.

I'll pass.

 

[Subduction Zone]

What was it you tested? ion trail? plasma cloud? time crystals? microwave background? what exactly?

Make a clear claim and I will tell you how it can be tested. Vague claims are in the realm of "not even wrong". In other words they are worthless and only tend to shown that an idea is wrong.

 

[pitabread]

Then why did you read it?

Did I? I honestly wouldn't remember.

At this point though I have no interest in those threads and you won't see any recent activity from me in them.

 

[AV1611VET]

Make a clear claim and I will tell you how it can be tested.

Sure:

Creationism isn't science ... it's history.

And it didn't generate any evidence.

 

[AV1611VET]

Did I?

If I read Subduction Zone's post correctly, he said you did.

Or at least implied it.

 

[pitabread]

Sure:

Creationism isn't science ... it's history.

And it didn't generate any evidence.

This claim dramatically contradicts other creationists. Creationists need to sort things out amongst yourselves before trying to talk to everyone else.