- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,737
- 51,636
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
The distance is tangential to the solution.Note how far it is from what is now the middle east to Australia.
Have you seen my thread where I explained all of this?Now the question is, even if a few marsupials and monotremes could make this trip in the relatively short time period between the flood and you alleged continent separation (which actually took place many millions of years ago) why did none of the many species of placental mammals that came off the ark with them make the trip.
A pregnant Satyr, dragon, xyzeeiform, or whatever, gets off the Ark and, in a short period of time, goes around and "drops off" (i.e., gives birth) to a 'kind' that eventually becomes these different species of animals you're wondering about.
Sound silly? Good -- we're getting somewhere.
I don't care if they were inchworms, their predecessors could have been deposited 7000 miles from the Ark overnight.Many placental animals are more mobile than most of the marsupials and monotremes and some are very mobile indeed.
Okay -- [shrugs].There is no ecological niche occupied by marsupials or monotremes that is not occupied by at least several species of placental mammals.
By divine courier.So how did the marsupials and monotremes just happen to be the ones that ended up in Australia where they have a fossil record?
Why, of course! And God overlooked that, right? Just like He had to step in at the last minute and save Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-nego from a burning, fiery furnace, heated to seven times its thermal capacity?Of course rapid continent separation would have exposed enough new sea floor to cook the earth to death many times over but that is another story.
Oh.The calculation showing this are here.
Let me give you some advice, Frumious: Give up.
Upvote
0