phi·los·o·phyI think you're in desperate need of a really basic book on Philosophy. Because you don't seem to understand what the word even means. If you send me your address I'll be happy to send you something from my freshman year. It will make posting to the Philosophy forum less embarrassing for you.
fəˈläsəfē/
noun
- the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence, especially when considered as an academic discipline.
I am not ignoring your questions, but addressing them as they pertain to the subject, i.e., if something does not belong in the equation, I tell you. But you are obviously getting ahead of your ability to comprehend the subject: I gave you a very simple analogy of two realms, one below and one above - and it went right by you as if you did not know I even did it. If you cannot understand something as elementary as what I explained, you are not ready to go on. Nevertheless, I will (again) answer your questions:So, either you're intentionally ignoring my questions, or you have some vague idea that you think you are. But you really aren't.
I'll ask again.
If someone else claims to "see" another realm that can't be demonstrated, how do you, as a believer in a realm that seemingly can't be demonstrated, justify your disbelief in what they see? What if their realm contradicts the realm you believe in?
Notice the phrase "can't be demonstrated".
- First of all, I am not a "believer." What I know, I "know." But if I were only a "believer", the only justification would be, given a truthful explanation, is that I simply have no interest in it.
- If their explanation contradicted everything I know, the only explanation would be: 1) they aren't telling the truth, or 2) it all contradicts, because it is as different as they claim.
Upvote
0