Davian
fallible
- May 30, 2011
- 14,100
- 1,181
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Ignostic
- Marital Status
- Married
My name is not Really.My, my, quite a test! ;-) 1) "==== RESP:" -- My name is not "RESP". 2) "Has no one addressed your oft-appearing cartoon?" -- It appears in my signature; that is a feature of this forum. 3) "It leaves out what class is being taught!" -- It would appear to be a science class. 4) "If it's about values -- as in respect for life & others, goals & aspirations, our purpose, or such, then your scientific evidence is not good." -- Why not? 5) "Oh, I forgot, we aren't allowed to teach these things in public schools! ;-( " -- Why not? 6) "And, surprise! Our society shows it! ;-( " -- Yours, perhaps. 7) "If this is about a science class, then, yes, scientific evidence is appropriate" -- up to what it knows. But, what about beyond -- like dark energy, the origin of the universal, and the mystery of metaphysics which neither scientists nor doctors (in medical issues) have explanation? -- You are proposing a god-of-the-gaps? 8) "Then, what's the problem w evolution (not entirely proven by science) "-- Science does not prove anything. 9) "that has a God" -- What do you mean by "God"? 10) 'that creates the human unique soul," -- What is a "soul"? 11) "at the appropriate time," -- When would that be? 12) "in the most advanced creature? "-- What is the most advanced creature? By what criteria? 13) At Adam & Eve time, but, also, which continues daily? -- I am not sure that it does happen, unless you can define your terms.
14) "BTW: Adam & Eve doesn't not need to be the one man-one woman, literally, as told in Genesis." -- Really? How wrong is the Bible?
=== RESP: 1) Really?
I think, if you are not having fun here, you have come to the wrong place.2) You show a sense of humor.
Indeed. You can turn off signatures in the user control pages. Also, as with most static internet graphics, multiple occurrences to not "waste space" - the image is only downloaded once, and cached for repeated occurrences, based on your browser settings.A "feature", huh! ;-)
Reference was made to science and evidence, wherever that might apply.3) It appears? At least to you. Religion or ethics (the missing class) to others!
Not "my" science.4) So your science
Probably not purpose as you might have it.also provides answers to our purpose in life?
Not directly, no.Hmmm. Is psychology part of physics also?
North America or South America?5) It's the law (in America) -- a win for you guys.
I am from Earth. How about you?6) Oh, I forgot that you're from a different country, prob. world! ;-) An ETI?
I am no proposing answers. It is your answers that are on the table at this time.7) Call it what you want. So, your answers to these issues are ...?
A concept that you say you believe in but cannot explain. Are you comfortable this that?8) OK. I'll file this for later "science does not prove anything". 9) That concept that you won't allow yourself to realize.
And similarly, you cannot explain it?10) Another such similar concept.
So when is this appropriate time?11) In good time -- I think before I write.
Can you not tell?You might try this?
What is this criteria?12) Homo sapiens. By science criteria. Ask them.
Where did I say that?13) Rather, than RESP or Davian (or quatona) your label should be "Doubting Thomas" -- no wonder you can't get beyond "seeker". You're "not sure" of anything!
How is that my problem?I'll never be able to (even) define terms satisfactorily for you. Your wedge out of arguments.
Who made you the arbiter of what is allegory in the Bible?14) An open question of "how wrong the Bible". I've already mentioned allegory & other figures of speech which you just want to read literally, as a science or history book, for argument sake.
No need to be insulting just because I disagree with you.I just say "grow up" -- intellectually.
Upvote
0