- Nov 28, 2003
- 21,596
- 12,124
- 58
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
It really doesn't show.All I did was study church history as part of my M.Div.
It is a bold claim that something was unknown simply because it wasn't recorded in the Scriptures.As far as Mary's bodily assumption, None of the Apostles knew anything about it, so it wasn't a known doctrine in the early church.
Without any controversy at all, so it was clearly not something new or novel. Contrast that with the response the Church had to other innovations, such as the teachings of Nestorius or Arius among others. God always raised up champions to defend against false teaching yet there was never controversy surrounding the introduction of the Marian feasts to the liturgical calendar.It appeared around the 5th Century
There is a saying in the Orthodox Church, "we pray what we believe, we believe what we pray". If it is found in the liturgy then it fully ratified doctrine of the Church. It makes no difference to us when Rome decided to establish any particular dogma.and was finally ratified as a doctrine of the Catholic Church in 1950.
Upvote
0