How clueless can you get?

[civilwarbuff]

Just days after emails were released indicating the DNC tipped the scales in favor of Clinton over Sanders forcing the Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz to step down Hillary hires her as the "honorary" Chairwoman of her presidential campaign.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/c...norary-chair-of-campaign-team/article/2597520

The DNC crapped all over Sanders supporters by favoring Clinton; now Hillary provides another slap in the face to Bernie's supporters by making Schultz Honorary Chairwoman of her campaign.
She must really want Bernie supporters to vote for someone else.
You can't make this stuff up.

 

[dysert]

It should be obvious by now that Hillary can pretty much do whatever she wants and will remain untarnished.

 

[JustOneWay]

Just days after emails were released indicating the DNC tipped the scales in favor of Clinton over Sanders forcing the Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz to step down Hillary hires her as the "honorary" Chairwoman of her presidential campaign.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/c...norary-chair-of-campaign-team/article/2597520

The DNC crapped all over Sanders supporters by favoring Clinton; now Hillary provides another slap in the face to Bernie's supporters by making Schultz Honorary Chairwoman of her campaign.
She must really want Bernie supporters to vote for someone else.
You can't make this stuff up.

Why would you care about who the DNC decides as their candidate? And, why would you care if Clinton hires her?

The difference between the DNC and the RNC is the DNC chose the right person for their candidate, while the RNC chose the wrong one. Talk about clueless....

 

[dysert]

Why would you care about who the DNC decides as their candidate? And, why would you care if Clinton hires her?

The difference between the DNC and the RNC is the DNC chose the right person for their candidate, while the RNC chose the wrong one. Talk about clueless....

The RNC chose who the people voted for. The DNC chose a criminal.

 

[JustOneWay]

The RNC chose who the people voted for. The DNC chose a criminal.

No criminal.

That is just what the republicans lie about.

If you cant beat them, lie about them.

The RNC will regret their choice.

 

[tulc]

The RNC chose who the people voted for. The DNC chose a criminal.

When was she tried and convicted?
tulc(is just curious)

 

[JustOneWay]

When was she tried and convicted?
tulc(is just curious)

Don't you get so tired of asking that question? At this point, they show just how sad they are for this continued lie about Clinton. They don't want to discuss actual issues, they just attack, attack, attack....

 

[Landon Caeli]

Don't you get so tired of asking that question? At this point, they show just how sad they are for this continued lie about Clinton. They don't want to discuss actual issues, they just attack, attack, attack....

It all just proves how above Democracy Hillary really is. She is an elitist through and through.

 

[civilwarbuff]

Watching Fox News and the Bernie supporters don't appear to be very happy with the DNC.....could get interesting....

 

[JustOneWay]

It all just proves how above Democracy Hillary really is. She is an elitist through and through.

The comment had nothing to do with Clinton, and everything to do with what republicans call her. My comment validates nothing you mentioned.

 

[tulc]

Don't you get so tired of asking that question?

I'm from Chicago, getting tired about making your point is the first step to being overwhelmed and then you get ignored.

At this point, they show just how sad they are for this continued lie about Clinton. They don't want to discuss actual issues, they just attack, attack, attack....

they want it to be true so badly, they have to keep pushing it in spite of a complete absence of proof. It must be hard trying to reconcile the picture they have of them being "The Party of Truth!" and having to tell obvious lies at every turn. Maybe that's why they seem so...crabby lately?
tulc(cognitive dissonance must be hard to live with)

 

[tulc]

It all just proves how above Democracy Hillary really is. She is an elitist through and through.

so...you don't have a list of where she stood trial and of her convictions either? Where I come from? that's not called "being elitist" it's called "being innocent".
tulc(just a thought)

 

[Landon Caeli]

The comment had nothing to do with Clinton, and everything to do with what republicans call her. My comment validates nothing you mentioned.

I disagree. Look up the word "elitist" and then tell me that doesn't describe Hillary -who is above the rules.

 

[Landon Caeli]

so...you don't have a list of where she stood trial and of her convictions either? Where I come from? that's not called "being elitist" it's called "being innocent".
tulc(just a thought)

Elitists don't get tried or convicted. Theyre above that....

 

[JustOneWay]

I disagree. Look up the word "elitist" and then tell me that doesn't describe Hillary -who is above the rules.

Who said she is above the rules?

Show us how she is above the rules? She has been investigated for four years, and they found nothing they could indict, let alone convict. An elitist would have never been investigated, let alone investigated for years....

 

[Landon Caeli]

A true elitist is also guaranteed to win elections too, which is now evident.

 

[Landon Caeli]

Oh powerful Democrat party, give us what you say we need. Give us who you say we need... We trust in you.

 

[tulc]

Elitists don't get tried or convicted. Theyre above that....

I'm curious: how do you tell the difference between someone being innocent and someone being "elitist"? Is it when they agree with you or you like them: innocent! if you don't like them they're probably "elitist"?
tulc(just wondering)

 

[tulc]

A true elitist is also guaranteed to win elections too, which is now evident.

So President Reagan: elitist? Ross Perot? not elitist? Abraham Lincoln? Elitist? Stephen Douglas? Not elitist?
tulc(suspects there must be more to it then this)

 

[Landon Caeli]

I'm curious: how do you tell the difference between someone being innocent and someone being "elitist"? Is it when they agree with you or you like them: innocent! if you don't like them they're probably "elitist"?
tulc(just wondering)

Typically someone investigated by the FBI as well as having been accused of other dishonest things would not typically become a prime candidate by any party... Typically.

But Hillary is very high ranking and influential in her party. To become the nominee for president and knowing all this is a clear indication of her elite status in government.

...there is no hiding the obvious.