V
Valid Name
Guest
Greetings Rabbi Cohen,
Thank you very much for your gracious reply, it is most appreciated. I came here a while ago looking to converse about the Noahide law. I started a thread on it, and was hoping for someone like you to come along. Perhaps I can ask a moderator to snipp our conversation from this thread to that one.
Now don't get me wrong, I have absolutely NO problem with the mitzvi that you mention. My issue really is about whether or not these laws were given at the time they are said to have been, and what the repercussions of these would have been.
Allow me to share my reasoning why I do not believe that the Noahide Laws exist (not the laws themselves, but a biblical teaching of them as the Noahide law).
You did bring up Acts 15, which is often associated with the Noahide law.
Bear with me for a moment -
If a Law is given, then not only is a Law made, but Lawbreakers are made. It is said that the law is not made for the righteous, but the unrighteous. A good example is in the garden of eden. We can find that Eve had coveted a fruit, she coveted how The Father is (she wished to be wise like him), she told the serpent that she was not to touch the fruit, but she did, and she stole. None of these things were wrong however, because there was no Law against stealing or coveting, only eating the fruit.
Thus, they ate the fruit, and became Transgressors of the Law.
Now Paul talks about this, and he comes to a conlusion about the Law:
I hope I conveyed this correctly and that we can continue this disscussion in due time. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Valid Name
Thank you very much for your gracious reply, it is most appreciated. I came here a while ago looking to converse about the Noahide law. I started a thread on it, and was hoping for someone like you to come along. Perhaps I can ask a moderator to snipp our conversation from this thread to that one.
Now don't get me wrong, I have absolutely NO problem with the mitzvi that you mention. My issue really is about whether or not these laws were given at the time they are said to have been, and what the repercussions of these would have been.
Allow me to share my reasoning why I do not believe that the Noahide Laws exist (not the laws themselves, but a biblical teaching of them as the Noahide law).
You did bring up Acts 15, which is often associated with the Noahide law.
Bear with me for a moment -
If a Law is given, then not only is a Law made, but Lawbreakers are made. It is said that the law is not made for the righteous, but the unrighteous. A good example is in the garden of eden. We can find that Eve had coveted a fruit, she coveted how The Father is (she wished to be wise like him), she told the serpent that she was not to touch the fruit, but she did, and she stole. None of these things were wrong however, because there was no Law against stealing or coveting, only eating the fruit.
Thus, they ate the fruit, and became Transgressors of the Law.
Now Paul talks about this, and he comes to a conlusion about the Law:
Here is where the jist of my problems come with the Noahide Laws. It is said that they were given between the time of Adam and Moses, during the time of Noah. Now if there were Laws given, there were also Transgressors of those Laws. However Paul comes to the Conclusion that NO ONE Transgressed a Law between the Time of Adam and Moses like Adam did. No one Transgressed a command, because there was not one given. So death reigned over those who were not breaking a Law, and The Father could see this was unjust. If you die, you need to die for your own sin, not someone elses. So then The Law enters to do what? INCREASE the Offense of Adam, to make others transgressors JUST LIKE Adam Was.Romans 5:14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come. 15 But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many. 16 And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification. 17 For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.) 18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life. 19 For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous. 20 Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:
I hope I conveyed this correctly and that we can continue this disscussion in due time. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Valid Name
Upvote
0