• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Hell is not permanent.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
katallasso said:
[SIZE=-1]I will say this again, for maybe the 3rd or 4th time. You're quotes from early church Jews mean nothing to me. They were getting it wrong at least from the time of Jeromes writings because he's the one that started all this when he tried to use inferior latin words for greek words.

Now back to the grammar.

Can't do it, the adjective can't be greater than the noun.

Also we go back to the perfectly good word they had for eternal which is used by the same writers. Why didn't they use it? Could it be because hell is NOT eternal?

This grammar thing really needs to be addressed for there to be any more argument.[/SIZE]

My quotes from Jewish scholars, written by Jews for Jews, shows their history, from before the Christian era. They couldn't care less about any Christian doctrine. Scoff all you like that was the history and tradition of Jesus and all the N.T. writers.

And I have told you over and over all your knee jerk copy pastes from hellmakers mean less than nothing to me, or any other reasonable person who can think for themself. I have proven many times the stuff from there is full of lies.

Your meaningless repetition of Jerome, over and over, is totally irrelevant. I have shown you repeatedly that the Jews centuries before Jerome, and the church long before Jerome, taught an endless hell where unrepentant sinners would be punished eternally. And I have proved this from sources that you have posted, Thayer's, Vincent, Liddell-Scott, etc. I pity you, so indoctrinated that you think saying Jerome, Jerome, Jerome, answers everything.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Children of Light said:
[SIZE=-1]Hey anyone here can answer a question that I pose:

If you were to be able to feel the punishment of hell on a spiritual level for yourself and were then able to come back to Earth after that torment, how do you think you would react? Would your views still be the same or do you think you may change your views?
Just curious.[/SIZE]

Jesus already answered that question.
[24] Luke 16:22 [. . .] the rich man also died, and was buried;
23 And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.
24 And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.
25 But [Jesus said] Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.
26 And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us[sup]4[/sup], that would come from thence.​
[sup]4[/sup] Note, those in “hades,” the place of torment, cannot leave. 10,000 eons times 10,000 eons from now God’s unchanging word will still say, “neither can they pass to us

Scoffers argue it is only a parable, if so, what is the point of the parable? In every legitimate parable, Jesus uses common, every day, events to illustrate or clarify, usually not clearly understood, spiritual truth. The only common, every day, events in this story are Lazarus begging and the rich man living high. Everything else occurs after the death of Lazarus and the rich man. What spiritual truth, for the living, is Jesus clarifying, or illustrating, by talking about things that happen after death, that his audience had never experienced?

In all the legitimate parables Jesus uses nonspecific persons, “a certain man,” “a certain king,” etc. In the thousands of years of history, someone said or did the things Jesus mentioned. Somebody, somewhere, lost sheep and coins, and found them, sowed seed, etc.

But Abraham is a specific, historical, person. If Abraham did not actually, in fact, speak to the rich man, in hades, and, literally, say the words, in blue, that Jesus quotes, Jesus is a liar.
27 Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father's house:
28 For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment.
29 [Jesus said] Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.
[…]
31 [Jesus said] And he [Abraham] said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.
 
Upvote 0

Deraj

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2005
705
13
38
Douglas
✟23,431.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Der Alter said:
Jesus already answered that question.
[24] Luke 16:22 [. . .] the rich man also died, and was buried;
23 And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.
24 And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.
25 But [Jesus said] Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.
26 And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us[sup]4[/sup], that would come from thence.

[sup]4[/sup] Note, those in “hades,” the place of torment, cannot leave. 10,000 eons times 10,000 eons from now God’s unchanging word will still say, “neither can they pass to us.”

How do you show that Hades/Sheol is the place of torment? I assume you mean by this that it is the eternal hell that is refered to in the Bible, but I disagree.

1 Sam. 2:6;
The LORD killeth, and maketh alive: he bringeth down to the grave, and bringeth up. (KJV)

The word "grave" in the above scripture is translated from the Hebrew word "Sheol" in the Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (BHS)".
Or from the Greek word "Hades" in the Septuagint.
It seems from what you say in the post above, that you believe that Hades is Hell, but 1 Sam. 2:6 shows that after going to Hades/Sheol, the Lord still can "bringeth up" from there. I believe that Hades/Sheol is the place that your spirit goes after our physical death and before it is reunited with an immortal body in the resurrection.
 
Upvote 0
Der Alter said:
My quotes from Jewish scholars, written by Jews for Jews, shows their history, from before the Christian era. They couldn't care less about any Christian doctrine. Scoff all you like that was the history and tradition of Jesus and all the N.T. writers.

And I have told you over and over all your knee jerk copy pastes from hellmakers mean less than nothing to me, or any other reasonable person who can think for themself. I have proven many times the stuff from there is full of lies.

Your meaningless repetition of Jerome, over and over, is totally irrelevant. I have shown you repeatedly that the Jews centuries before Jerome, and the church long before Jerome, taught an endless hell where unrepentant sinners would be punished eternally. And I have proved this from sources that you have posted, Thayer's, Vincent, Liddell-Scott, etc. I pity you, so indoctrinated that you think saying Jerome, Jerome, Jerome, answers everything.
Actually Jerome answered very little and is part of the problem.
 
Upvote 0

katallasso

God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Him
Aug 28, 2005
959
41
Florida
✟23,824.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Der Alter said:
English definitions are irrelevant although they contradict you, eon means eternal.



Your point is? Eonian means everlasting, eternal.







This blind cut and paste from hellmakers, I have proven at least three times to be a damnable lie straight from the pits of hell. Here is what The Liddell-Scott-Jones lexicon actually says. If the blind lead the blind they both shall fall in the ditch.
Liddell-Scott-Jones A Greek Lexicon

[SIZE=+1]αιων[/SIZE] aion onos, ho, Ion. and Ep. also he, as in Pi.P.4.186, E.Ph.1484: apocop. acc. aio like Poseido, restored by Ahrens (from AB363) in A.Ch.350: (properly aiWon, cf. aevum, v. aiei):--period of existence (to telos to periechon ton tes hekastou zoes chronon . . aion hekastou kekletai Arist.Cael.279a25 ):

I. lifetime, life, psuche te kai aion Il.16.453 ; ek d' ai. pephatai Il.19.27 ; mede toi ai. phthineto Od.5.160 ; leipei tina Il.5.685 ; ap' aionos neos oleo (Zenod. neon) 24.725; teleutan ton aiôna Hdt.1.32 , etc.; aionos sterein tina A.Pr.862 ; aiona dioichnein Id.Eu.315 ; sundiatribein Cratin. 1 ; ai. Aiakidan, periphr. for the Aeacidae, S.Aj.645 s. v. l.; apepneusen aiona E.Fr.801 ; emon kat' aiona A.Th.219 .

2. age, generation, ai. es triton ib.744; ho mellon aion posterity, D.18.199, cf. Pl.Ax.370c.

3. one's life, destiny, lot, S.Tr.34, E.Andr.1215, Fr.30, etc.

II. long space of time, age, aion gignetai 'tis an age, Men.536.5; esp. with Preps., ap' aionos of old, Hes.Th.609, Ev.Luc.1.70; hoi apo tou ai. Rhomaioi D.C. 63.20 ; di' aionos perpetually, A.Ch.26, Eu.563; all one's life long, S. El.1024; di' aionos makrou, apaustou, A.Supp.582,574; ton di' ai. chronon for ever, Id.Ag.554; eis hapanta ton ai. Lycurg.106, Isoc.10.62; eis ton ai. LXX Ge.3.23, al., D.S.21.17, Ev.Jo.8.35, Ps.-Luc. Philopatr.17; eis aiona aionos LXX Ps.131(132).14 ; ex aionos kai heos aionos ib.Je.7.7; ep' ai. ib.Ex.15.18; heos aionos ib.1 Ki.1.22, al.:-- without a Prep., ton hapanta ai. Arist. Cael.279a22; ton aiona Lycurg. 62 , Epicur.Ep.1p.8U.; eternity, opp. chronos, Pl.Ti.37d, cf. Metrod. Fr.37, Ph.1.496,619, Plot.3.7.5, etc.; tous huper tou aionos phobous Epicur.Sent.20 .

2. space of time clearly defined and marked out, epoch, age, ho aion houtos this present world, opp. ho mellon, Ev.Matt.13.22, cf. Ep.Rom.12.2; ho nun ai. 1 Ep.Tim.6.17, 2 Ep.Tim.4.10:--hence in pl., the ages, i.e. eternity, Phld.D.3 Fr.84; eis pantas tous ai. [color-red]LXX To.13.4[/color] ; eis tous ai.ib. Si.45.24, al., Ep.Rom.1.25, etc.; eis tous ai. ton aionon LXX 4 Ma.18.24 , Ep.Phil.4.20, etc.; apo ton ai., pro ton ai., Ep.Eph.3.9, 1Cor.2.7; ta tele ton ai. ib.10.11.
[…]
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/resolveform

[SIZE=+1]αιωνιος[/SIZE] aionios , on, also a, on Pl. Ti.37d, Ep.Heb.9.12:--lasting for an age (aion 11 ), perpetual, eternal (but dist. fr. aidios, Plot.3.7.3), methe Pl.R. 363d ; anolethron . . all' ouk aionion Id.Lg.904a , cf. Epicur. Sent.28; ai. kata psuchen ochlesis Id.Nat.131 G.; kaka, deina, Phld.Herc. 1251.18, D.1.13; ai. amoibais basanisthesomenoi ib.19; tou ai. theou Ep.Rom. 16.26 , Ti.Locr.96c; ou chronie mounon . . all' aionie Aret.CA1.5 ; ai. diatheke, nomimon, prostagma, LXX Ge.9.16, Ex.27.21, To.1.6; zoe Ev.Matt.25.46 , Porph.Abst.4.20; kolasis Ev.Matt. l.c., Olymp. in Grg.p.278J.; pro chronon ai.2 Ep.Tim. 1.9 : opp. proskairos, 2 Ep.Cor. 4.18.

2. holding an office or title for life,perpetual, gumnasiarchos CPHerm.62 .

3. = Lat. saecularis, Phleg.Macr.4.

4. Adv. -ios eternally, nous akinetos ai. panta ôn Procl.Inst.172 , cf. Simp. in Epict.p.77D.; perpetually, misein Sch.E.Alc.338.

5. aionion, to, = aeizoon to mega, Ps.-Dsc.4.88.

http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/resolveform




I will omit the rest of the so-called quotes in your cut/paste, there is absolutely no doubt they are just as phony as the Liddell-Scott stuff, hellmakers manufactured. If you want to swallow every bit of poison some Jim Jones/David Koresh website spews out do so. But I have a brain and I don't believe everything just because it happens to aggree with me.



I have already addressed this cut and paste the last time you posted it, in this thread, [Here!]





Even the source you quote here, shows aion, aionian, to be a SYNONYM for aidios. You do know what synonym means don't you?
Strong's G5801
Synonyms
See Definition for aidios [G126]
See Definition for aionios [G166]

126-covers the complete philosophical idea--without beginning
and without end? Also either without beginning or without
end? As respects to the past it is applied to what has
existed time out of mind
166-gives prominence to the immeasurableness of eternity.



Same cut/paste, same reply. Thayer's shows aion, aionios to be a SYNONYM for aidios. Your argument is moot.


I have highlighted when the translation is given a certain lenght of time in blue and when it is rendered eternity in green. Blue wins.

Again it is the same argument, how can a word that has a set duration all of a sudden turn around and be an eternity. It makes no sense. You gave one dictionary Liddell Scott, I gave 11 other ones.
 
Upvote 0

Havahope

Senior Member
Dec 1, 2005
507
16
✟23,247.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married

der alter said:
Watch your dirty mouth about my view of the Jewish Encyclopedia. Your rant about them being anti-Christ is irrelevant. What I have done is prove from Jewish, not Christian sources, that favor my view, what the ancient Jews, before the time of Christ, believed about the "New Jerusalem."
How could they favor your view? Wait, let me guess. You were the main overseer and consultant to the compilation. Right?
der alter said:
Jesus and John were ancient Jews and this would have been their tradition.
Here is an interesting story taken from the Midrash Kohelet: (The Midrashim are ancient Rabbinical expositions of Holy Writ.)

"Hadrian (whose bones may they be ground, and his name blotted out) once asked Rabbi Joshua ben Chanania, "From what shall the human frame be reconstructed when it rises again?" "From Luz in the backbone," was the answer. "Prove this to me," said Hadrian. Then the Rabbi took Luz, a small bone of the spine, and immersed it in water, but it was not softened; he put it into the fire, but it was not consumed; he put it into a mill, but it could not be pounded; he placed it upon an anvil and struck it with a hammer, but the anvil split and the hammer was broken."

Wow! Thats almost as good as the "stacked mountains" story.

No, Jesus said He was "the way, the truth (not tradition) and the light."
And He also said He was "the resurrection, and the life".

der alter said:
Another knee jerk reply which ignores the context of the article. The Sibylline oracles are only one of the sources cited. When Paul quoted Greek poets on three occasions in the N.T. was he putting them "in the same category as our inspired New Testament scripture?"
No, because at the time of the quote, Paul himself was writing part of our N T scriptures. The Greeks had at least a few things right, and Paul was simply using the things that they did have right to make his point.
der alter said:
Knee jerk, knee jerk. The word new has not been de-anything. Remember, the Jews, before the time of Jesus, originated the term "New Jerusalem." It is new and it comes down from heaven, so it is "new" or "upper," as distinct from the old temple in Jerusalem. See Rev 3:12 and 21:2, the new, heavenly, upper, Jerusalem.
Is that so? Well show me where you have found the term "chadash Yruwshalaim" in any of their writings. And even if you did, it cannot be found in any of the Old Testament writings; which the Old Testament writings would be the only really authoritative source here. "Upper" and "New" are two entirely different words, and do not even faintly resemble each other in their meanings.
der alter said:
Yeah right, another knee jerk, meaningless diatribe. Check the scripture cited at that point, Is 54:10, quoted below. And you will note that only one source presents that view.
Isaiah 54:10 "For the mountains shall depart, and the hills be removed; but my kindness shall not depart from thee, neither shall the covenant of my peace be removed, saith the Lord that hath mercy on thee."

That verse is a long, long stretch away from saying that God is going to stack all the mountains on the face of the earth; one on top of the other and then send down a literal city to sit atop the stack.
der alter said:
How about this "Yeah right." Jesus said the very stones would cry out.
The "yeah right " expression addressed the ridiculousness of the doctrine which has been promulgated here. And yes indeed the stones would have cried out if those people's joy and elation had been supressed. For John tells us that this event was the fulfillment prophecy.
Zechariah 9:9 "REJOICE GREATLY, O daughter of Zion; SHOUT, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon a donkey, and upon a colt the foal a donkey."

Jesus shows here that their suppression, which would have amounted to keeping prophecy from coming to pass, would be just as impossible as the crying out of stones would be.
For He says: "IF these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out."

der alter said:
How does a city created in heaven, i.e. a heavenly city, preclude it from being literal?
That which is created in, and comes from heaven, is spiritual. And that which is spiritual has no earthly form of its own; such as literal flesh and blood, or a literal building of bricks and stones. However, literal things of this earth which do have a literal form of their own are often used as symbols to help us see and understand that which we can not see, or touch with our literal earth bound senses.

der alter said:
God can create the world and restore the dead from the dust of the earth, but you don’t think he can restore the temple vessels from the time of Moses. Pretty weak god you have.
I think God can and did create the world. And I think He can restore the dead from the dust of the earth. And I think He can restore the temple vessels from the time of Moses.

But as far as restoring the dead from the dust of the earth, I don't think He will.


1 Corinthians 15:44 "It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body."


1 Corinthians 15:47-48 "The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.
As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly."


Neither do I believe that He will restore the temple vessels. Those things all had to do with presenting the blood of animals to God as the sacrifice for the sins of man.
May I point you to Jesus Christ? the perfect, sinless "Lamb" of God, whose once and for all times, by the shedding of His own blood for the sins of mankind, has done away with everything ever connected to useless shedding of the blood of animals as the means of an atonement for us. And that would include the vessels of the temple, I believe.
der alter said:
Rev 3:12 Him who overcomes I will make a pillar in the temple of my God. Never again will he leave it. I will write on him the name of my God and the name of the city of my God,
der alter said:
the new Jerusalem, which is coming down out of heaven from my God; and I will also write on him my new name.

Well, if I am going to be turned into a literal pillar (support post) in the temple of God, and I will never be able to leave that position, then I think I will just pass on trying to overcome.


And another thing, I can't wait to see is what God will write with when He writes His name and and the name of His city on those who overcome. Will it be a pencil? A ball point pen? A magic marker? A paint brush? Which of these literal things do you suppose He will write with?

-- King James Translation of 21:2 -- "And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband."
-- American Standard's --
Revelation 21:2 "And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven of God, made ready as a bride adorned for her husband. "
-- Young's Bible Translation --
Revelation 21:2 "and I, John, saw the holy city - new Jerusalem - coming down from God out of the heaven, made ready as a bride adorned for her husband;"
-- Darby's Bible Translation --
Revelation 21:2 "And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of the heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband."
-- Weymouth's New Testament Translation --
Revelation 21:2 "And I saw the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of Heaven from God and made ready like a bride attired to meet her husband."
-- Webster's Bible Translation --
Revelation 21:2 "And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband."
-- International Standard Version Translation --
Revelation 21:2 "I also saw the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared like a bride adorned for her husband."
-- William's NewTestament Translation --
Revelation 21:2 "And I saw the new Jerusalem, the holy city, coming down out of heaven from God, made ready like a bride to join her husband."
-- Montgomery New Testament Translation --
Revelation 21:2 "And I saw the Holy City, the New Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God, made ready like a bride adorned for her husband."
-- der alter translation -- (I assume ? ?)
"Rev 21:2 I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband."
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Deraj said:
[SIZE=-1]How do you show that Hades/Sheol is the place of torment? I assume you mean by this that it is the eternal hell that is refered to in the Bible, but I disagree.

1 Sam. 2:6;
The LORD killeth, and maketh alive: he bringeth down to the grave, and bringeth up. (KJV)

The word "grave" in the above scripture is translated from the Hebrew word "Sheol" in the Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (BHS)".
Or from the Greek word "Hades" in the Septuagint.
It seems from what you say in the post above, that you believe that Hades is Hell, but 1 Sam. 2:6 shows that after going to Hades/Sheol, the Lord still can "bringeth up" from there. I believe that Hades/Sheol is the place that your spirit goes after our physical death and before it is reunited with an immortal body in the resurrection[/SIZE]
.

Disagree all you like. I don't care. For the moment the Hebrew word sheol is irrelevant. I quoted from Luke 16, N.T. written in Greek. How do I show hades is the place of torment? Because hades is the word translated "hell" in Luk 16:23, the rich man said it was place of torment, and Abraham said nobody could leave.

And having dutifully posted your one out-of-context kneejerk proof text please explain how spanking a child with a rod will keep him from dying and being buried in sheol?
Pro 23:14 Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell.​
Before you presume to lecture me on sheol/hades, gehenna, etc. perhaps you should read what the Jews actually believed about hell. I believe they know more about their language Hebrew than you do.
Jewish Encyclopedia-GEHENNA

By : Kaufmann Kohler Ludwig Blau


The place where children were sacrificed to the god Moloch was originally in the "valley of the son of Hinnom," to the south of Jerusalem (Josh. xv. 8, passim; II Kings xxiii. 10; Jer. ii. 23; vii. 31-32; xix. 6, 13-14). For this reason the valley was deemed to be accursed, and "Gehenna" therefore soon became a figurative equivalent for "hell." Hell, like paradise, was created by God (Sotah 22a); according to Gen. R. ix. 9, the words "very good" in Gen. i. 31 refer to hell; hence the latter must have been created on the sixth day. Yet opinions on this point vary. According to some sources, it was created on the second day; according to others, even before the world, only its fire being created on the second day (Gen. R. iv., end; Pes. 54a). The "fiery furnace" that Abraham saw (Gen. xv. 17, Hebr.) was Gehenna (Mek. xx. 18b, 71b; comp. Enoch, xcviii. 3, ciii. 8; Matt. xiii. 42, 50; 'Er. 19a, where the "fiery furnace" is also identified with the gate of Gehenna). Opinions also vary as to the situation, extent, and nature of hell. The statement that Gehenna is situated in the valley of Hinnom near Jerusalem, in the "accursed valley" (Enoch, xxvii. 1 et seq.), means simply that it has a gate there. It was in Zion, and had a gate in Jerusalem (Isa. xxxi. 9). It had three gates, one in the wilderness, one in the sea, and one in Jerusalem ('Er. 19a).

"The earth is one-sixtieth of the garden, the garden one-sixtieth of Eden [paradise], Eden one-sixtieth of Gehenna; hence the whole world is like a lid for Gehenna. Some say that Gehenna can not be measured" (Pes. 94a). It is divided into seven compartments (Sotah 10b); a similar view was held by the Babylonians (Jeremias, "Hölle und Paradies bei den Babyloniern," pp. 16 et seq., Leipsic, 1901; Guthe, "Kurzes Bibel-wörterb." p. 272, Tübingen and Leipsic, 1903). Because of the extent of Gehenna the sun, on setting in the evening, passes by it, and receives from it its own fire (evening glow; B. B. 84a). A fiery stream ("dinur") falls upon the head of the sinner in Gehenna (Hag. 13b). This is "the fire of the West, which every setting sun receives. I came to a fiery river, whose fire flows like water, and which empties into a large sea in the West" (Enoch, xvii. 4-6). Hell here is described exactly as in the Talmud.

The fire of Gehenna never goes out (Tosef., Ber. 6, 7; Mark ix. 43 et seq.; Matt. xviii. 8, xxv. 41; comp. Schwally, l.c. p. 176); there is always plenty of wood there (Men. 100a). This fire is sixty times as hot as any earthly fire (Ber. 57b). There is a smell of sulfur in Gehenna (Enoch, lxvii. 6).

In Isa. lxvi. 16, 24 it is said that God judges by means of fire. Gehenna is dark in spite of the immense masses of fire; it is like night (Yeb. 109b; comp. Job x. 22). The same idea also occurs in Enoch, x. 4, lxxxii. 2; Matt. viii. 12, xxii. 13, xxv. 30 (comp. Schwally, l.c. p. 176).

It is assumed that there is an angel-prince in charge of Gehenna. He says to God: "Put everything into my sea; nourish me with the seed of Seth; I am hungry." But God refuses his request, telling him to take the heathen peoples (Shab. 104). God says to the angel-prince: "I punish the slanderers from above, and I also punish them from below with glowing coals" ('Ar. 15b). The souls of the sons of Korah were burned, and the angel-prince gnashed his teeth at them on account of their flattery of Korah (Sanh. 52a). Gehenna cries: "Give me the heretics and the sinful [Roman] power" ('Ab. Zarah 17a).

It is assumed in general that sinners go to hell immediately after their death. The famous teacher Johanan b. Zakkai wept before his death because he did not know whether he would go to paradise or to hell (Ber. 28b). The pious go to paradise, and sinners to hell (B. M. 83b).

They are cast into Gehenna to a depth commensurate with their sinfulness. They say: "Lord of the world, Thou hast done well; Paradise for the pious, Gehenna for the wicked" ('Er. 19a).

There are three categories of men; the wholly pious and the arch-sinners are not purified, but only those between these two classes (Ab. R. N. 41). A similar view is expressed in the Babylonian Talmud, which adds that those who have sinned themselves but have not led others into sin remain for twelve months in Gehenna; "after twelve months their bodies are destroyed, their souls are burned, and the wind strews the ashes under the feet of the pious. But as regards the heretics, etc., and Jeroboam, Nebat's son, hell shall pass away, but they shall not pass away" (R. H. 17a; comp. Shab. 33b).

The felicity of the pious in paradise excites the wrath of the sinners who behold it when they come from hell (Lev. R. xxxii.). The Book of Enoch (xxvii. 3, xlviii. 9, lxii. 12) paraphrases this thought by saying that the pious rejoice in the pains of hell suffered by the sinners. Abraham takes the damned to his bosom ('Er. 19a; comp. Luke xvi. 19-31).

When Nebuchadnezzar descended into hell, all its inhabitants were afraid that he was coming to rule over them (Shab. 149a; comp. Isa. xiv. 9-10). The Book of Enoch also says that it is chiefly the heathen who are to be cast into the fiery pool on the Day of Judgment (x. 6, xci. 9, et al.). "The Lord, the Almighty, will punish them on the Day of Judgment by putting fire and worms into their flesh, so that they cry out with pain unto all eternity" (Judith xvi. 17).

The sinners in Gehenna will be filled with pain when God puts back the souls into the dead bodies on the Day of Judgment, according to Isa. xxxiii. 11 (Sanh. 108b). Enoch also holds (xlviii. 9) that the sinners will disappear like chaff before the faces of the elect. There will be no Gehenna in the future world, however, for God will take the sun out of its case, and it will heal the pious with its rays and will punish the sinners (Ned. 8b).

It is frequently said that certain sins will lead man into Gehenna. The name "Gehenna" itself is explained to mean that unchastity will lead to Gehenna ([SIZE=+1]הנס = חנס[/SIZE] ; 'Er. 19a); so also will adultery, idolatry, pride, mockery, hypocrisy, anger, etc. (Sotah 4b, 41b; Ta'an. 5a; B. B. 10b, 78b; 'Ab. Zarah 18b; Ned. 22a).

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=115&letter=G
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
katallasso said:
[SIZE=-1]I have highlighted when the translation is given a certain lenght of time in blue and when it is rendered eternity in green. Blue wins.

Again it is the same argument, how can a word that has a set duration all of a sudden turn around and be an eternity. It makes no sense. You gave one dictionary Liddell Scott, I gave 11 other ones.[/SIZE]

Blue wins? What kind of silly nonsense is that? Even in English that is not how words are defined. And you can't even see how hypocritical this reply is can you. You act like nothing at all happened.

Let me explain. You quoted a partial definition from your pet cess pool universalist website. The quote was a lie, allegedly from the Liddell-Scott lexicon that purported to show that aion/aionios ONLY had the meaning of a limited duration of time, and never, ever, meant eternal, forever, unending etc.

When I posted a fuller definition from, and even linked to, the primary source online, not some guys' website, you don't even acknowledge the fact that you were dead wrong. Then you presume to lecture me on how to determine the meaning of a word from a professional, scholarly Greek lexicon by counting how many times it is translated eternity vs. how many times it isn't.

No you did not give 11 others. You posted cut and paste garbage from a website. The Englsih defintion are irrelevant plus thay all support my argument. That is all you have ever posted, cut and paste, bits and pieces, from the same garbage website. You have not quoted one single thing from any legitimate source. NOTHING. And I have proved several things, from the website, including the Liddell-Scott "quote" to be lies.

You can post a hundred different people swearing that aion/aionios never, ever, meant eternal, forever, etc. and it would mean absolutely nothing. First Liddell-Scott-Jones proves from historical writings that hundreds of years before the Christian era, aion/aionios meant eternal, etc. The historical evidence is undeniable, it doen't matter how many liars say otherwise.

Second, in this post you tacitly admit that aion/aionios does mean eternal, but because it is used in a time limited sense, more often, according to you, it should mean a period of time in all situations.

Again your so-called argument is meaningless. If you want to know why the words have more than one meaning, hop in a time machine go back to about 800 BC and ask the Greeks who invented the word and its definitions.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Havahope said:
[SIZE=-1]How could they favor your view? Wait, let me guess. You were the main overseer and consultant to the compilation. Right?

Here is an interesting story taken from the Midrash Kohelet: (The Midrashim are ancient Rabbinical expositions of Holy Writ.)

Wow! Thats almost as good as the "stacked mountains" story.[/SIZE]

WOW! That is just and meaningless all all your other knee jerk cut and pastes. Is that another piece of rubbish from you pet website? Where can I review the primary source? Oh wait you don't even know what a primary source is do you?

[SIZE=-1]No, Jesus said He was "the way, the

And He also said was "the resurrection, and the life".[/SIZE]

And this is relevant to what?

[SIZE=-1]No, because at the time of the quote, Paul himself was writing part of our N T scriptures. The Greeks had at least a few things right, and Paul was simply using the things that they did have right to make his point.[/SIZE]

Guess what so did the writers of the O.T. and the editors of Jewish encyclopedia. Truth is truth no matter where is is recorded. Someone saying, the same truth can be found in this outside writing, does not validate the entire writing, just as Pauls quotes do not vaildate everything those pagan poets ever wrote.

[SIZE=-1]Is that so? Well show me where you have found the term "chadash Yruwshalaim" in any of their writings. And even if you did, it cannot be found in any of the Old Testament writings; which the Old Testament writings would be the only really authoritative source here. "Upper" and "New" are two entirely different words, and do not even faintly resemble each other in their meanings.[/SIZE]

I showed you from two verses in Rev. it was both upper, and new, no contradicton of anything just a refusal on your part to actually read anything.

Did you read my post from the Jewish Encyclopedia re: New Jerusalem?

[SIZE=-1]Isaiah 54:10 "For the mountains shall depart, and the hills be removed; but my kindness shall not depart from thee, neither shall the covenant of my peace be removed, saith the Lord that hath mercy on thee.

That verse is a long, long stretch away from saying that God is going to stack all the mountains on the face of the earth; one on top of the other and then send down a literal city to sit atop the stack.[/SIZE]

One "long stretch" interpretation, according to you, by one Jewish rabbi proves absolutely nothing about anything else.

[SIZE=-1]The "yeah right " expression addressed the ridiculousness of the doctrine which has been promulgated here. And yes indeed the stones would have cried out if those people's joy and elation had been supressed. For John tells us that this event was the fulfillment prophecy.[/SIZE]

So according to you inanimate stones can literally cry out, but God cannot make a literal Jerusalem descend from heaven.

[SIZE=-1]That which is created in, and comes from heaven, is spiritual. And that which is spiritual has no earthly form of its own; such as literal flesh and blood, or a literal building of bricks and stones. However, literal things of this earth which do have a literal form of their own are often used as symbols to help us see and understand that which we can not see, or touch with our literal earth bound senses.[/SIZE]

Scripture please. I want to see scripture which states that nothing in heaven is literal. You two proof texts only address the resurrection body.

[SIZE=-1]Well, if I am going to be turned into a literal pillar (support post) in the temple of God, and I will never be able to leave that position, then I think I will just pass on trying to overcome.

And another thing, I can't wait to see is what God will write with when He writes His name and and the name of His city on those who overcome. Will it be a pencil? A ball point pen? A magic marker? A paint brush? Which of these literal things do you suppose He will write with.[/SIZE]

If you are capable I would like to have an adult discussion not a bunch of "Neener, neener, neener, you are one too-oo." Do you think you can handle that or is it too difficult for you?

There is an old maxim about interpreting scripture, "If the plain sense, makes good sense, it is nonsense to look for any other sense." Can you understand that or should I explain it.

Bible versions are irrelevant, unless like the NET, they have notes that explain their grammatical choices. Otherwise you can find a version that will prove almost anything.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Tamam said:
[SIZE=-1]Actually Jerome answered very little and is part of the problem.[/SIZE]

[size=+1]ויפתח יהוה את־פי האתון[/size]
 
Upvote 0

katallasso

God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Him
Aug 28, 2005
959
41
Florida
✟23,824.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Second, in this post you tacitly admit that aion/aionios does mean eternal, but because it is used in a time limited sense, more often, according to you, it should mean a period of time in all situations.

"tacitly admit" nope never did....the adjective can't be greater than the noun. Liddell is just perpetuating the mistranslation from the latin.
 
Upvote 0

Soul Searcher

The kingdom is within
Apr 27, 2005
14,799
3,846
64
West Virginia
✟47,044.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Der Alter said:
[SIZE=+1]ויפתח יהוה את־פי האתון[/SIZE]

:sigh:

Don't you think that it is just a bit lame to insult people in hebrew?
 
Upvote 0
Has anyone pointed out that in the cases in which the phrase "eternal life" is used, the exact same greek word (αἰώνιος) is used? Shall we infer by this argument that the OP believes that we will not really have eternal life?

How is it that the word means eternal when used in a good way but it means something entirely (infinitely) different when used regarding hell?

Just wondering.
 
Upvote 0
H

hybrid

Guest
eoe said:
Has anyone pointed out that in the cases in which the phrase "eternal life" is used, the exact same greek word (αἰώνιος) is used? Shall we infer by this argument that the OP believes that we will not really have eternal life?

How is it that the word means eternal when used in a good way but it means something entirely (infinitely) different when used regarding hell?

Just wondering.

good point.

.
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
71,048
7,942
Western New York
✟158,022.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
modhat.jpg

MOD HAT ON!

This thread is not about Der Alter. It is about the nature of Hell. Now if there are any more off-topic posts, the thread will be closed and warnings will be given out.

I have spoken to each of you about the proper way to handle something you believe to be a rule violation, and to use the ignore button if you do not like the way certain posters post. You, alone, are responsible for the way you post.

Please review the rules before posting again. That is not a suggestion.

MOD HAT OFF!
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Soul Searcher said:
:sigh:

[SIZE=-1]Don't you think that it is just a bit lame to insult people in hebrew?[/SIZE]

How is it an insult? But your response and the post I was replying to are def. lame.
 
Upvote 0

katallasso

God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Him
Aug 28, 2005
959
41
Florida
✟23,824.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
eoe stated:

Has anyone pointed out that in the cases in which the phrase "eternal life" is used, the exact same greek word (αἰώνιος) is used? Shall we infer by this argument that the OP believes that we will not really have eternal life?

How is it that the word means eternal when used in a good way but it means something entirely (infinitely) different when used regarding hell?

Just wondering.

Notice in the scriptures that we use that properly translate "aion" there is evidence of eteral life for us. This is the Rotherham translation.


[SIZE=+1]2 Cor 5:4 [/SIZE][SIZE=+1]And verily, we who are in the tent, do sigh, being weighed down, while yet we are not wishing to unclothe ourselves, but to clothe ourselves over,--in order that, what is mortal, may be swallowed up, by[SIZE=+1] life[/SIZE].[/SIZE]

[SIZE=+1]2 Timothy 1:10 [SIZE=+1]But hath now been made manifest through means of the forthshining of our Saviour Christ Jesus,--Who, indeed, hath abolished death, and hath thrown light upon[SIZE=+1] life[/SIZE] and incorruptibility, through means of the glad-message:[/SIZE][/SIZE]

[SIZE=+1]1 Cor 9:25 [/SIZE][SIZE=+1]But, every man who striveth in the games, in all things, useth self-control;--they, indeed, then, that a corruptible crown, they may receive; but, we, an[SIZE=+1] incorruptible[/SIZE]![/SIZE]

[SIZE=+1]1 Cor 15:52 [SIZE=+1]In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, during the last trumpet; for it shall sound, and, the dead, shall be raised,[SIZE=+1] incorruptible[/SIZE], and, we, shall be changed. [/SIZE][/SIZE]

[SIZE=+1]1 Peter 1:4 [SIZE=+1]Unto an inheritance,[SIZE=+1] incorruptible[/SIZE] and undefiled and unfading, reserved in the heavens for you[/SIZE][/SIZE]

[SIZE=+1]1 Peter 1:23 [SIZE=+1]Having been regenerated--Not out of corruptible seed, but[SIZE=+1] incorruptible[/SIZE]--through means of the word of a Living and Abiding God;[/SIZE][/SIZE]
 
Upvote 0

katallasso

God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Him
Aug 28, 2005
959
41
Florida
✟23,824.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You see, the difference is, in the NT the Lord is trying to lay out for us His plan for the ages the time of time in the universe and here, our eternal life is another issue. This cannot be done in a bible that doesn't translate the word "aion" [age] properly.
 
Upvote 0

timlamb

Senior Veteran
Feb 22, 2006
3,166
106
Entiat Washington
✟26,480.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
katallasso said:
eoe stated:



Notice in the scriptures that we use that properly translate "aion" there is evidence of eteral life for us. This is the Rotherham translation.


[SIZE=+1]2 Cor 5:4 [/SIZE][SIZE=+1]And verily, we who are in the tent, do sigh, being weighed down, while yet we are not wishing to unclothe ourselves, but to clothe ourselves over,--in order that, what is mortal, may be swallowed up, by[SIZE=+1] life[/SIZE].[/SIZE]

[SIZE=+1]2 Timothy 1:10 [SIZE=+1]But hath now been made manifest through means of the forthshining of our Saviour Christ Jesus,--Who, indeed, hath abolished death, and hath thrown light upon[SIZE=+1] life[/SIZE] and incorruptibility, through means of the glad-message:[/SIZE][/SIZE]

[SIZE=+1]1 Cor 9:25 [/SIZE][SIZE=+1]But, every man who striveth in the games, in all things, useth self-control;--they, indeed, then, that a corruptible crown, they may receive; but, we, an[SIZE=+1] incorruptible[/SIZE]![/SIZE]

[SIZE=+1]1 Cor 15:52 [SIZE=+1]In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, during the last trumpet; for it shall sound, and, the dead, shall be raised,[SIZE=+1] incorruptible[/SIZE], and, we, shall be changed. [/SIZE][/SIZE]

[SIZE=+1]1 Peter 1:4 [SIZE=+1]Unto an inheritance,[SIZE=+1] incorruptible[/SIZE] and undefiled and unfading, reserved in the heavens for you[/SIZE][/SIZE]

[SIZE=+1]1 Peter 1:23 [SIZE=+1]Having been regenerated--Not out of corruptible seed, but[SIZE=+1] incorruptible[/SIZE]--through means of the word of a Living and Abiding God;[/SIZE][/SIZE]
You seem to use these scripture like they are ment for all, believers and nonbelievers. Scripture must be looked at not only in context but in who said it and who was he talking to. When talking to believers, who are justified by FAITH, "there is an inheritance,...reserved in the heavens for you". Look at how Jesus spoke to the disciples, in relation to how he spoke to the pharisies. He made no promiss of eternel life to those who did not have faith.
We are justified by faith. We are saved through faith in Jesus Christ. On the day of judgement, face to face, all will believe, but that requires no faith
I feel utimately certain that those who deny Jesus now, would deny Him no matter what they are faced with at the end of this life. They might be willing to say anything, to promise, cry and beg, but they will never serve the Lord, they are not His sheep.
SAD, SAD, SAD, but true!
timlamb
 
Upvote 0

katallasso

God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Him
Aug 28, 2005
959
41
Florida
✟23,824.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
timlamb said:
You seem to use these scripture like they are ment for all, believers and nonbelievers. Scripture must be looked at not only in context but in who said it and who was he talking to. When talking to believers, who are justified by FAITH, "there is an inheritance,...reserved in the heavens for you". Look at how Jesus spoke to the disciples, in relation to how he spoke to the pharisies. He made no promiss of eternel life to those who did not have faith.
We are justified by faith. We are saved through faith in Jesus Christ. On the day of judgement, face to face, all will believe, but that requires no faith
I feel utimately certain that those who deny Jesus now, would deny Him no matter what they are faced with at the end of this life. They might be willing to say anything, to promise, cry and beg, but they will never serve the Lord, they are not His sheep.
SAD, SAD, SAD, but true!
timlamb

Let's don't jump to conclusions, the question from eoe was do we Universalists believe that there is eternal life for the redeemed, not how one becomes born again.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.