He doesn't hate humanity as much as he hates not being God. And since God made us in his image, we are an easier target to attack. He knows he can not attack God, but he can hold His children ransom.
Do you view the article was unbibical?
Upvote
0
He doesn't hate humanity as much as he hates not being God. And since God made us in his image, we are an easier target to attack. He knows he can not attack God, but he can hold His children ransom.
We know that Lucifer fell and became Satan at the latest in the garden of Eden since he brought about the fall of mankind. Since he caused the fall of mankind it doesn't make sense that he'd be jealous of our salvation. Frankly, I don't think they can be saved. If God could save them I think he would. My own speculation is that their being only spirits made their fall total. Whereas humanity being made in the image of God is tripartate so our fall in the had the work-ability of salvation since we are three parts not one part.
III. NOT BECAUSE ANGELS, IF LEFT WITHOUT HELP, WOULD SUFFER LESS THAN MEN WOULD HAVE DONE IF THEY HAD BEEN SO LEFT. The greatest sufferings are not those of the body, but those of the mind and heart. And the measure of suffering endured by any one is regulated by his mental and moral capacity. Therefore, if our estimate of angelic capacity be correct, being left without redemption the sufferings of angels will be greater than man's would have been if he had been so left. Their vast powers must be terrible instruments of self-torture. Their remembrance of the irrevocable past must also augment their misery. Their recollection of their lost heritage must greatly increase the anguish which afflicts them. But we have no such memories. Only two of our race experienced the joys of that Eden from which sin has exiled us. We know not the peace and bliss of the human heart in its original state. Hence we conclude that the sufferings of angels are greater than those of men would have been if they had been left without the saving help of God.
II. BECAUSE EVERY FALLEN ANGEL CONSENTED TO THE TRANSGRESSION BY WHICH THEY FELL, WHILE MAN, THROUGH THE LAWS OF HIS BEING, SUFFERS FROM THE SIN OF THE FIRST TRANSGRESSORS TO WHICH THEY ALONE CONSENTED. The sin of the angels affected only those of their number who were guilty of actual participation therein. But the condition of every man is greatly affected through the sin of the first parents of our race. The way in which men are brought into being differs from that of angels. Generation obtains amongst men, but not amongst angels. We are born with an inclination, a bias, to that which is evil. Were it not for the grace of God, that inclination would be irresistible. If Christ had not come to our help, we must have been utterly ruined by reason of a transgression for which we could not possibly have been in any way responsible. Here, then, we have a very powerful reason why God should provide redemption for man rather than for angels.
We know that Lucifer fell and became Satan at the latest in the garden of Eden since he brought about the fall of mankind. Since he caused the fall of mankind it doesn't make sense that he'd be jealous of our salvation. Frankly, I don't think they can be saved. If God could save them I think he would. My own speculation is that their being only spirits made their fall total. Whereas humanity being made in the image of God is tripartate so our fall in the had the work-ability of salvation since we are three parts not one part.
We know that Lucifer fell and became Satan at the latest in the garden of Eden since he brought about the fall of mankind. Since he caused the fall of mankind it doesn't make sense that he'd be jealous of our salvation. Frankly, I don't think they can be saved. If God could save them I think he would. My own speculation is that their being only spirits made their fall total. Whereas humanity being made in the image of God is tripartate so our fall in the had the work-ability of salvation since we are three parts not one part.
Lucifer was never Satan, just a term for an arrogant Babylonian king in a proverb (Lucifer is a translation of Morning Star, which many kings at the time were known by, including Jesus). The serpent was never said in Genesis to be anything more than a serpent—the curse to slither on the ground wouldn't make sense otherwise.
An animal, an amoral being, causing the fall of man? That makes no sense.
It may "not make sense" to you, but it's what the text outright states. Genesis 3 starts by saying that "the serpent was the craftiest of all the beasts of the field that the Lord God had made", indicating that it was actually an animal. Plus the punishment, for the snake to slither on the ground, worked as an explanation for why snakes slither to this day. A punishment that makes perfect sense if it's an animal, not if it's an entity in disguise.
Not to mention those of the Old Testament didn't even have a concept of a devil. How the Serpent Became Satan - Biblical Archaeology Society
Animals are amoral-how could they make a person question God? This is preposterous.
Thank youQ: Where is the new heaven?
A: Its promise is in the present "heaven", waiting to descend to usher in Eternity. Bible search/Google: "New Heaven".
Where is the PRESENT "heaven"?
Thank youQ: What doctrine is this?
A: Ain't no doctrine...just a logical answer to a silly question.
Thank you
"The serpent was never said ...to be anything more than a serpent..."
HMMM??
Revelation 12:9
And the "great dragon" was thrown down, the "serpent of old" (in E den?!) who is called the devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.
Revelation 20:10
And the devil (satan/serpent/dragon) who deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast (anti-Christ) and the false prophet (anti-spirit) are also; and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever.
God allowed satan/serpent/dragon/devil/Lucifer/Baal/etc into Eden to tempt A&E, to test their obedience to Him. That "evil" was the absence of God!
Revelation 20:2
And he laid hold of the "dragon, the serpent of old", who is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years;
No devil/satan/serpent in the OT?? How about BAAL??
Zephaniah 1:4
“So I will stretch out My hand against Judah And against all the inhabitants of Jerusalem. And I will cut off the remnant of Baal from this place, And the names of the idolatrous priests along with the priests.
Romans 11:4
But what is the divine response to him? “I have kept for Myself seven thousand men who have not bowed the knee to Baal.”