- Jul 2, 2018
- 18,580
- 11,386
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Did Jesus die to save us from God?Nobody with a true sense of the gravity of our sin and rebellion would say that.
Upvote
0
Did Jesus die to save us from God?Nobody with a true sense of the gravity of our sin and rebellion would say that.
No one with a sense of God's plan for Universal Restoration would say that.
Did Jesus die to save us from God?
The saw cuts both ways. You want to lay that on me but won't take it on yourselves.That's what we're asking you.
Did i say no one has a "serious sin and rebellion problem"?Why would people without a serious sin and rebellion problem need restoring?
There's no discarding, "atonement" is not salvation. Through Jesus death is defeated, the issue of sin is dealt with. All sins are atoned for, but unbelief remains separating man from God.Fervent said: ↑
So what the Bible literally says should simply be discarded, why?
The saw cuts both ways. You want to lay that on me but won't take it on yourselves.
Gracepointe is not encouraging homosexual acts. They are only condoned within a monogamous legal marriage. (as I understand it)Our forum rules themselves call Universalism an unorthodox position, and prohibit anyone from encouraging someone to engage in homosexual acts, among other things. Both things GracePointe is doing, and yes I get they can be discussed here.
Jesus was considered unorthodox in his day. Was that wrong?Our forum rules themselves call Universalism an unorthodox position...
Jesus was considered unorthodox in his day. Was that wrong?
Gracepointe is not encouraging homosexual acts. They are only condoned within a monogamous legal marriage. (as I understand it)
Was He, though? The Pharisee's and scribes, the Sauducees, and the people all turned to Him for His teachings. He wasn't rejected for teaching strange doctrine, in fact the Jewish authorities routinely tried to trip Him up into saying something out of keeping. So unorthodox is not quite the right word.Jesus was considered unorthodox in his day. Was that wrong?
Was He, though? The Pharisee's and scribes, the Sauducees, and the people all turned to Him for His teachings. He wasn't rejected for teaching strange doctrine, in fact the Jewish authorities routinely tried to trip Him up into saying something out of keeping. So unorthodox is not quite the right word.
If marrying a dog was legal, it would most certainly be a marriage. At least in legal terms.Homosexual acts aren't going on in this 'marriage'? It isn't a marriage, it's a farce and a travesty. Would a man marrying his dog be a marriage if it was legal?
I disagree.Was He, though? The Pharisee's and scribes, the Sauducees, and the people all turned to Him for His teachings. He wasn't rejected for teaching strange doctrine, in fact the Jewish authorities routinely tried to trip Him up into saying something out of keeping. So unorthodox is not quite the right word.
If marrying a dog was legal, it would most certainly be a marriage. At least in legal terms.
Is polygamy legal in God's eyes? Did he condone it? Is slavery legal in God's eyes? did he condone it? Did he restore Sodom?I'm only concerned with what is legal in God's eyes.
That doesn't say He was unorthodox, they marveled at His manner of teaching not the teaching themselves. The scribes would always cite the tradition from which they were teaching, naming masters and quoting them. Jesus on the other hand taught "as one who had authority," meaning He didn't pin it to a master's tradition. The authorities were constantly trying to get Him to teach something they could hold against Him because His teaching was directly from Scripture and outside of a few clarifications was very orthodox within the wisdom traditions.I disagree.
Matthew 7:28-29 NIV
When Jesus had finished saying these things, the crowds were amazed at his teaching, 29 because he taught as one who had authority, and not as their teachers of the law.
So, you are claiming that Jesus was teaching orthodox Judaism? What's wrong with this picture? - lolThat doesn't say He was unorthodox, they marveled at His manner of teaching not the teaching themselves. The scribes would always cite the tradition from which they were teaching, naming masters and quoting them. Jesus on the other hand taught "as one who had authority," meaning He didn't pin it to a master's tradition. The authorities were constantly trying to get Him to teach something they could hold against Him because His teaching was directly from Scripture and outside of a few clarifications was very orthodox within the wisdom traditions.