God Made This

[quatona]

Rational come to the conclusion that God is innate to man's psyche.

I don´t think it is.

So believe in Him, put your faith in Him.

Wait, are you starting to preach to me?

It doesn't stop you doing science.

Apparently it does - at least when scientific results fly in the face of your beliefs.

See the Atheist chooses to see beauty in "enlightenment" that there is no evidence for God.

And is happy to be a slave to their morality trait.

When it comes to the description of atheist notions, I will prefer to listen to what atheists say about it.

Unless you're a psychopath Atheist, then watch out for the predator.

This is rather cryptic to me.

...but the kangaroos were cute.

 

[I'm_Sorry]

Can you answer the questions instead of dodging them?

Yes I care, just look around. Why do humans war for God?

To me I'm happy to wait for conformation after death.

Another irrational assertion to the material minded (psyche).

 

[quatona]

Well I'm a human, so identify the need for the majority of humans to appeal to Faith in one form or another even when there is evidence to support otherwise.

You would have to explain how you get from the needs of a majority to "innate trait".

It is, its in the field of human psychology.

No, it isn´t.

If an atheist had a drug to keep empathy but remove an appeal to God they would shove it down our mouth.

Persecution fantasy noted.

...but the kangaroos were cute.

 

[I'm_Sorry]

I don´t think it is.

Why don't you think it is.

Wait, are you starting to preach to me?

No. If I were I'd say Jesus!!!!!!!

Apparently it does - at least when scientific results fly in the face of your beliefs.

There are many fields. E.g. I'm typing on a computer.

When it comes to the description of atheist notions, I will prefer to listen to what atheists say about it.

Fair enough maybe some can chime in on that for you.

This is rather cryptic to me.

Science = No evidence for universal morality.

Science = Evidence for human morality, empathy.

Science = Evidence for human's with a near 0 or great lack of morality, empathy.

...but the kangaroos were cute.

And it made you smile on the inside, a visual appeal to Love.

 

[Freodin]

Perhaps God made them approach so you could see.

They don't normally do that when a human is around

Mother Roo was trusting.

And perhaps God didn't, but some of the myriad of other causes that influences animal behaviour did.

So what? You proclaim your faith. That's your prerogative. But if you want to discuss science, you need to have something more to offer than, "Perhaps God did it".

 

[I'm_Sorry]

You would have to explain how you get from the needs of a majority to "innate trait".

Empathy = both.

No, it isn´t.

Explain.

...but the kangaroos were cute.

Yes they sure are!

 

[I'm_Sorry]

And perhaps God didn't, but some of the myriad of other causes that influences animal behaviour did.

So what? You proclaim your faith. That's your prerogative. But if you want to discuss science, you need to have something more to offer than, "Perhaps God did it".

Point taken, I am a bit "blind-sighted" by their cuteness

 

[Skreeper]

Yes I care, just look around. Why do humans war for God?

To me I'm happy to wait for conformation after death.

Another irrational assertion to the material minded (psyche).

If you would care about the truth you wouldn't use faith as a justification since we established that faith is not a reliable tool to discern truth from fiction.

 

[quatona]

Why don't you think it is.

Because you haven´t given me a good reason to accept your assertion.

No. If I were I'd say Jesus!!!!!!!



There are many fields. E.g. I'm typing on a computer.


Fair enough maybe some can chime in on that for you.



Science = no evidence for universal morality.

Science = Evidence for human morality.

Science = Evidence for human's with a near 0 or lack of morality.

I´m sure you´ll find yourself someone who is willing to discuss on your level.
Whereas I bid you a good-bye.

....but the cangaroos were cute.




And it made you smile on the inside, a visual appeal to Love. [/QUOTE]

 

[I'm_Sorry]

Because you haven´t given me a good reason to accept your assertion.

7 billion people with the majority believing in God.

It must be innate to some extent like empathy, if not the result of empathy.

So War, if man cant evolve out of his (Faith in God with no evidence) there is a high possibility that he will destroy himself and all life. - (I don't believe is possible)

I believe this requires the Savoir (Jesus) of course, but its not man himself nor in the hope for ET or habitable planets that will save life.

I´m sure you´ll find yourself someone who is willing to discuss on your level.
Whereas I bid you a good-bye.

....but the cangaroos were cute.

Until the next cute video

 

[I'm_Sorry]

If you would care about the truth you wouldn't use faith as a justification since we established that faith is not a reliable tool to discern truth from fiction.

Truth speaks to the heart as well as the eyes.

Empathy and the conflict of love and evil is best described in Christianity IMO.

The science of psychology doesn't help man with his conflict of love and evil.

And there are some who will see the kangaroo as not cute or loving.

And are happy to prey on you for their gain even to the point of taking your life.

It is possible that man's endeavor for truth through science will be swallowed up by himself. (war, self destruction, earth destruction)

 

[Skreeper]

Truth speaks to the heart as well as the eyes.

Empathy and the conflict of love and evil is best described in Christianity IMO.

The science of psychology doesn't help man with his conflict of love and evil.

And there are some who will see the kangaroo as not cute or loving.

And are happy to prey on you for their gain even to the point of taking your life.

It is possible that mans endeavor for truth through science will be swallowed up by himself. (war, self destruction, earth destruction)

Now you're just uttering nonsense. But I didn't expect anything different from someone who thinks being irrational is something to be proud of.

The only thing you can do when someone is proud of being irrational is just to ignore them so I'm going to do just that.

 

[quatona]

7 billion people with the majority believing in God.

It must be innate to some extent like empathy, if not the result of empathy.

So War, if man cant evolve out of his (Faith in God with no evidence) there is a high possibility that he will destroy himself and all life. - (I don't believe is possible)

I believe this requires the Savoir (Jesus) of course, but its not man himself nor in the hope for ET or habitable planets that will save life.

You are free to believe whatever you wish.

 

[I'm_Sorry]

Now you're just uttering nonsense. But I didn't expect anything different from someone who thinks being irrational is something to be proud of.

The only thing you can do when someone is proud of being irrational is just to ignore them so I'm going to do just that.

You and I are at polar opposites.

Are you going to be able to ignore the irrational (7 billion people with the majority believing in God) for much longer if you want a utopia on earth or even simply an earth?

Tell me how much damage to life has man's religions caused?

Are you not worried if this is the only life you have, if not for yourself, your children and their children?

 

[xianghua]

That being said, I do believe in evolution to the extent that the kangaroos we know today are probably not the kangaroos that God directly created. So we do "sort-of" agree. We just disagree on the extent by how much those natural processes can accomplish

yep. the ancient kangaroo also was a kangaroo:

Kangaroos Gods amazing craftsmanship - creation.com

 

[xianghua]

The evidence for kangaroo evolution including their speciation from earlier diprotodontia quadrupeds somewhere around 18-25 million years ago is quite extensive. There are about 140 species of extinct predecessors that have been cataloged, and more are being discovered, with two new fossil species discovered in 2016 and published on earlier this year:

they are still kangaroo so its not realy evolution of a new family\kind.

 

[xianghua]

I cant prove it, I stand in Faith.

Since I'm irrational to scientists (Faith), prove primordial soup or panspermia.

And since you're Catholic prove Mary was in the sky or Fátima.

Sound really cuddly seeing the "queen of heaven" in the sky?

actually we can prove that god exist. for example: the flalgellum is a real spining motor found in nature:

Flagellum - Wikipedia

we know that a motor need a designer. therefore nature need one.

 

[Skreeper]

actually we can prove that god exist. for example: the flalgellum is a real spining motor found in nature:

Flagellum - Wikipedia

we know thta a motor need a designer. therefore nature need one.

This has already been refuted. 16 years ago...

CB200.1: Bacterial flagella and Irreducibly Complexity

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Australian wildlife may not be the best poster children for God:

King Brown - therefore God?

Sydney Funnel Web - therefore God?

Irukandji - therefore God?

Drop Bear - therefore.....?

 

[I'm_Sorry]

View attachment 191436
King Brown - therefore God?
View attachment 191438
Sydney Funnel Web - therefore God?
View attachment 191440
Irukandji - therefore God?
View attachment 191441
Drop Bear - therefore.....?

When you know God, all His creatures are beautiful.

The above demand respect for their deadly poison.

But the Koala is not in the same category.

More Cute coming now that you made a joke of our beloved Koala.