So there's nothing overtly sexual about it. There's no reason to complain about it. It's not unwholesome. But if he reads a story to some kids while their parents are there, then that somehow makes it shockingly immoral?
So there's nothing overtly sexual about it. There's no reason to complain about it. It's not unwholesome. But if he reads a story to some kids while their parents are there, then that somehow makes it shockingly immoral?
So you are saying that one needs to take the character of the person involved into consideration? You don't think that a person that you know about would be interested in corrupting children but you think a random dude dressed in the same way would be?
If that's the case, on what do you base that conclusion?
So you are saying that one needs to take the character of the person involved into consideration? You don't think that a person that you know about would be interested in corrupting children but you think a random dude dressed in the same way would be?
If that's the case, on what do you base that conclusion?
Fair enough. But you can see the point being made. If it's ok for Giuliani to go drag and no-one assumes ulterior motives, then why do so when someone else does it? It cannot be the fact that some guy is just reading stories to children. That in itself is harmless.