You are incorrect. The sons of God in Old Covenant and New Covenant were still talking about the one human congregation of Israel starting with the Jews and then the Gentiles.
The first question we need to tackle is "who are the sons of God?"
Yes the sons of God Are angels , you insist to push your private interpretation onto Gods Word as if you wrote it
Clean the cobwebs out of your carnal thinking and wake up to the facts.
Job2
1 And the day was, when the
sons of God came
To
present themselves before Jehovah :
And
Satan came in also among them
To present himself before Jehovah.
2 And Jehovah said unto Satan : " From whence comest thou ?"
And Satan answered Jehovah, and said :
" From running to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it."
3 And Jehovah said unto Satan :
Notice how many bible translations describe the sons of God to be Angels
(NIV)One day the
angels came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came with them.
(NIVUK)One day the
angels came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came with them.
(NIRV)One day
angels came to the Lord. Satan also came with them
(NLT)One day the
members of the heavenly court came to present themselves before the Lord, and the Accuser, Satan, came with them.
(NRSV)One day the
heavenly beings came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them.
(NRSVA)One day the
heavenly beings came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them.
(NRSVACE)One day the
heavenly beings came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them.
(NRSVCE)One day the
heavenly beings came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them.
(OJB)Now there was a yom when the Bnei HaElohim came to present themselves before Hashem, and Hasatan came also among them.
(ICB)One day the
angels came to show themselves before the Lord. Satan also came with them.
(AMP)Now there was a day when the sons of God (
angels) came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan (adversary, accuser) also came among them.
(AMPC)Now there was a day when the sons
(the angels) of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan (the adversary and accuser) also came among them.
(CEB)One day the
divine beings came to present themselves before the Lord, and the Adversary also came among them.
(CEV)One day, when the
angels had gathered around the Lord, and Satan was there with them,
(ERV)Then the day came for the
angels to meet with the Lord. Even Satan was there with them.
(EXB)One day the ·
angels [L sons of God] came to ·show themselves [stand] before the Lord, and ·Satan [L the Satan; C means “the Accuser” or “the Adversary”; either the Devil or a member of God’s heavenly court] was with them.
(GNT)When the day came for the
heavenly beings to appear before the Lord, Satan was there among them.
(ICB)One day the
angels came to show themselves before the Lord. Satan also came with them.
(ISV)One day,
divine beings presented themselves to the Lord, and Satan accompanied them.
(TLB)One day as the
angels came to present themselves before the Lord, Satan, the Accuser, came with them
(MSG)One day when the
angels came to report to God, Satan, who was the Designated Accuser, came along with them. God singled out Satan and said, “What have you been up to?” Satan answered God, “Going here and there, checking things out on earth.”
(NCV)One day the
angels came to show themselves before the Lord, and Satan was with them.
Notice Almighty God is speaking directly to satan asking where'd you come from -in the presence of the "sons of God"
Of course, I will deny it, because you are quoting from an extra-biblical book called "The Book of Enoch" which is NOT part of the canon of the Scripture.
And no, there is no BIBLICAL proof of angels ever having sex relationship with women on earth. That is a man-made interpretation based on how they read into "Sons of God." Move on, obviously, you are not a BIBLE student, to begin with.
Obviously it is You are not a BIBLE student to begin with , you Force you private interpretation on scripture and people when you are so wrong it is astonishing
For years I used to think that the canon was not accurate and just accepted it as it taught that way , when I decided to study and find out why it became evident that it is just men who decide what they feel is needed to focus on what they want to teach - most similarly as various denominations choose to interpret scripture in different ways which is why various denominations exist - they choose to believe differently on various topics
Book of Enoch is part of liturgical canon of Ethiopian and Eritrean Churches within Oriental Orthodox communion. The reason for this inclusion is because this book is included by Jews in the early first century as confirmed in Dead Sea Scrolls.Assyrian Church of the East for example use only 22 New Testament books in their New Testament liturgical canon. Eastern Orthodox to this day doesn't include Revelation in their liturgical canon, because they don't use it in liturgy. Each churches have their own liturgical canon.
A simple analogy to understand could be: having a drawer in the kitchen for tools having screwdriver , wrenches , forks, spoons, knives, hammer ,drill and you choose to separate them into two drawers one containing tools utensils used for food , and a drawer of tools used for home repair . Neither is invalid they just have a different use.
More often a canon is used for the teaching of salvation and various
churches decide for themselves that which they shall include in their canon . Historians that have written about the historical events of the ancient times are not in the canon but are often used to help understand biblical topics and events of Jesus and the apostles . It is useful and valid information ,
Enoch being is some versions of the canon is recognition of validity , but such book is not necessary to learn of the salvation of Christ Jesus which is what the Protestant canon is more focused on so it was not included .
Fact is that Enoch supports and corroborates the canon scriptures that prove the "sons of God" are actually angels , but in your carnal way of thinking you insist on a false interpreted meaning of this term and then you insist you are right and anyone that is not in agreement is wrong.,