It is not an ad hominem. For it to be an ad hominem it would need to come in the form of "Hamster is wrong because he is arrogant". I made the observation that you are willing to put others to death based on your interpretation of your holy works. It is an observation, not an argument.Ad hominems always help in these situations. And by always, I mean never.
Eventually we will get to the point where abortion is once again seen as murder, and treated as such. But until then, this will save innocent lives.
God. (Please remember which site you are on, and our rules.)
I asked if you care about babies. Simple question.
God.
Yeah, so? I didn't vote for Him...
An embryo is not a baby.
do you even believe in Him??
Yes it is.An embryo is not a baby.
No you didn’t.Stumped you, I see.
Actually, they might. What the law requires is not necessarily morally right.Your religious beliefs don't establish rightness or wrongness.
That is correct.Your religious beliefs don't establish rightness or wrongness.
But you didn’t say that.It is not an ad hominem. For it to be an ad hominem it would need to come in the form of "Hamster is wrong because he is arrogant". I made the observation that you are willing to put others to death based on your interpretation of your holy works. It is an observation, not an argument.
Actually, they might. What the law requires is not necessarily morally right.
If it were, slavery would still be considered a matter of property rights. You would be opposed to slavery, I am guessing, even if the law permitted it.
Since you advocate for the death of babies, at least you are consistent. As for me, I care about the born and unborn.Ones I don't have or know? Not especially.
You? Simple question.
You answered your own question by including "most stages" in your statement.
He doesn’t run for office.Yeah, so? I didn't vote for Him...
Since you advocate for the death of babies, at least you are consistent. As for me, I care about the born and unborn.