Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Faith is proof of it's own existence, if you had any you would know. Former Atheist who also amused themselves with mental gymnastics attest to the childishness of their former attitude.
Faith is proof of it's own existence,
They hide behind logic, it's the only place to talk to them.
Faith is evidence, its a gift from God.
But to the unborn no amount of evidence can or will be provided.
Yes, and you are hypocrites in that you don't apply those to all that you do, it's only when talking with religious people about religion that you turn into a friggen robot demanding a math path for every move.
What things do we not apply it to?
Because you invented the childish false premise of FSM.
Do you have faith in FSM?
Valuing the worth of another's experience,
you discount it, mock it, tell us we are imagining things when you have no such testable proof of the validity or lack there of concerning my experience.
Your every skepticism of my faith is a super material conclusion which is nit based in mathematical analysis.
I judge another person's experience by the evidence they can produce of its worth. That doesn't require faith.
You can't present any evidence of its validity, so why should I accept it as true?
That makes zero sense.
Yet another similarity shared with God.
I am one of the unborn like you are, remember? You don't have faith in the FSM because he has not gifted it to you, and no amount of evidence will make you believe in the FSM because you are one of the unborn.
You don't have to accept my faith, you just have no right to tell me that my experience is invalid while at the same time claiming that everything you do is based on proof.
I'm going to ask you again, don't avoid answering the question, do you have faith in the FSM God?
Good for you. I don't see it that way. Both are supernatural entities that can be claimed to exist, and in that respect: they are the same.
The conclusion would be the same. If it can't be shown to exist, there's no valid reason to assume they exist. And that is, off course, also assuming that there are no other, perhaps more indirect, reasons to point in the direction of their existence.
A good example here would be black holes. Einstein's theories suggested they exist. Einstein actually thought he had to be wrong somewhere, becaue the idea of a black hole didn't sound very appealing to him and there was no observational evidence of such bodies. Nevertheless, his theories seemed to be very accurate, which was quite strong evidence that those black holes just might be real. And several years later, lo and behold, they were discovered - by prediction of Einstein's theories.
So I feel the need to nuance your example a bit.
Having said that, we have nothing even remotely close to such suggested existence for either gods or spaghetti monsters.
Now, you're simply misrepresenting the point of the analogy.
The FSM is not (repeat: NOT) a plea for god's non-existence. In fact, I explicitly stated that "they are claimed to exist, but can't be shown to exist".
To not accept the claim "they exist" as a truth statement is not the same as accepting the opposite of the statement.
If you flip a coin, don't show me the results and then assert "it's heads" and I reply "I don't accept your claim as a truth-statement", it does not mean that I accept the claim "it's tails" as a truth statement.
There's a huge difference.
Of course not. I am an atheist. I have answered this several times now.
Weird you'd bring a subject up only to later tell us it is irrelevant to the discussion at hand.