Flat Earth

[JohnEmmett]

…

 

[Strathos]

Some say atheists are angry with God…


Sort of like a child… angry w/ parent

Some of them probably are. It's not my job to judge their motives.

 

[JohnEmmett]

Some of them probably are. It's not my job to judge their motives.

Some are obligated to speak


A philosopher…

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

Some say atheists are angry with God…

Sort of like a child… angry w/ parent

You can be angry with your parents because you know they exist; but if you don't believe in God how can you be angry with it? Could you be angry at Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy or Thoth?

I can see an atheist being angry about beliefs in God, or the concept of God.

 

[JohnEmmett]

but if you don't believe in God how can you be angry with it?

Saṃsāra has heavenly realms

 

[Astrid]

You can be angry with your parents because you know they exist; but if you don't believe in God how can you be angry with it? Could you be angry at Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy or Thoth?

I can see an atheist being angry about beliefs in God, or the concept of God.

A lot of people lack the capacity to understand that there sre
people who really dont believe in God.

 

[JohnEmmett]

A lot of people lack the capacity to understand that there are people who really don’t believe in God.

Romans 1:20

~

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

A lot of people lack the capacity to understand that there sre
people who really dont believe in God.

Apparently so.

 

[JohnEmmett]

Apparently so.

how are you not just in denial


you spend a lot of time denying

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

how are you not just in denial

you spend a lot of time denying

I probably spend more time questioning nonsense and correcting inaccuracies. You provide so many opportunities.

 

[JohnEmmett]

I probably spend more time questioning nonsense and correcting inaccuracies. You provide so many opportunities.

you need to question your own nonsense

 

[Subduction Zone]

Romans 1:20

~

That does not help you. Do you know why?

 

[JohnEmmett]

That does not help you. Do you know why?

because ?

 

[Subduction Zone]

because ?

You would first have to show that your source was reliable. Otherwise it is just an empty claim.

 

[JohnEmmett]

You would first have to show that your source was reliable. Otherwise it is just an empty claim.

rather it is logic

 

[Subduction Zone]

rather it is logic

Nope. You appear to be suffering from confirmation bias.

I doubt if you have a firm grip on logic.

 

[JohnEmmett]

Nope. I doubt if you have a firm grip on logic.

you doubt because you lack faith


this again is logic

 

[Subduction Zone]

you doubt because you lack faith


this again is logic

You are right. I do doubt because I lack faith. But though it is a logical conclusion you probably did not arrive to that conclusion using logic. You still need to support the Bible as a source if you want to use it in a debate Now that is logic.

 

[JohnEmmett]

You still need to support the Bible as a source

I value holy texts in general…

Like gold

 

[OnePath]

You are right. I do doubt because I lack faith. But though it is a logical conclusion you probably did not arrive to that conclusion using logic. You still need to support the Bible as a source if you want to use it in a debate Now that is logic.

By that requirement, what could ever be considered as a reliable source? I can't think of a single thing that someone else wouldn't object to as a source for information. Even if you did provide support for a source, you'd still need to provide support for the source of that support, and then support for your source-support support, and then support for that support-source, and so on. Firm logic there.