• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Flat Earth: Why doesn't a Plane's altitude meter (gyroscope) pitch up and down if it's a round earth

JacksBratt

Searching for Truth
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
16,294
6,495
63
✟596,843.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

lasthero

Newbie
Jul 30, 2013
11,421
5,795
✟236,977.00
Faith
Seeker
No, Antarctica. You cannot go there. Not without permission as described the treaty.

Getting permission isn't all that hard, and once you do, you're pretty much free to go wherever you like down there. Honestly, even if you didn't get permission, it's not like there's a forcefield that would keep you out of the place, and it's not being guarded by anyone.



There is a whole documentary on the guy on You tube. Interviews with him and video of his missions. He is a hero.




Oil, coal, minerals, all kinds.[/QUOTE]
 
Upvote 0

Strathos

No one important
Dec 11, 2012
12,663
6,532
God's Earth
✟270,796.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
So if we have a flat earth - and it is not infinite - show me the edge.


The evil Satanist conspiracy found the edge before anyone else could, and has been controlling it for thousands of years, and in all of that time not a single person who wasn't in on the conspiracy has ever seen it.

At least that seems to be the claim.
 
Upvote 0

AceHero

Veteran
Sep 10, 2005
4,469
451
38
✟36,933.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

brinny, I am genuinely horrified by this thread. We're actually in agreement for once!

I am reminded of Columbus and these flat earth warnings that his ships would fall off the edge of the earth. Now we're talking airplanes.



Speaking of airplanes -

Has any plane ever flown past the edge of the earth?

Though from what I've read it was understood that the earth was round long before Columbus sailed the ocean blue. He just didn't realize there was a giant landmass between Europe and India.
 
Reactions: brinny
Upvote 0

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,820
74
Las Vegas
✟263,478.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others


I would have preferred you take this time to state the biblical reasons for a non moving earth!! The things stated above are figures of speech--(the sun rises--terminology we use today) I am also one of those that do not believe the book of Enoch as inspired by God and therefore, not scripture.
The one scripture given me as prove the earth doesn't move doesn't say that at all--it says
(Psa 93:1) The LORD reigneth, he is clothed with majesty; the LORD is clothed with strength, wherewith he hath girded himself: the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved.

Can no be moved, and does not move are 2 very different meanings.
 
Upvote 0

davedajobauk

dum spiro spero
Site Supporter
Dec 26, 2006
55,183
28,520
77
Salford, Greater Manchester. UK
✟300,707.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
This is why an attitude indicator doesn't pitch
as you cruise in a plane across a spherical planet at high speeds.

A moot question ?

What OTHER 'kinds of planet' (SHAPES) are there?
~are there CUBES or PYRAMIDS ?


LOL ... sorry, I just had-to pick up on this

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

davedajobauk

dum spiro spero
Site Supporter
Dec 26, 2006
55,183
28,520
77
Salford, Greater Manchester. UK
✟300,707.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
According to this theory, where is the North Pole?

Actually; it is exactly, at the other-end of, the South Pole's axis
an axis, it shares with the South Pole

Did you know, that they spin, in opposite-directions also ?

Thrust a pencil through an apple and 'mark' the top NORTH
and, the bottom SOUTH
spin the NORTH 'end' of the pencil
in an anti-clockwise direction
and while it is spinning so
view the SOUTH's movement, about that axis

ROFLOL

 
Last edited:
Reactions: brinny
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
249,106
114,202
✟1,377,734.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution

LOL!
 
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
249,106
114,202
✟1,377,734.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution

LOL! Awesome!!!
 
Reactions: davedajobauk
Upvote 0

Oafman

Try telling that to these bog brained murphys
Dec 19, 2012
7,107
4,063
Malice
✟28,559.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Labour
Did I not hear correctly ?

ie: That they flew to the moon on the equivalent of a Dragon Computer



Almost.

The Apollo Guidance Computer:



had 64kb of RAM, so double that of the Dragon 32. But there was also a Dragon 64 which is a closer equivalent.

However, the AGC only had a clock speed of 0.043MHz, while the Dragons apparently had 0.89MHz so were much quicker.
 
Upvote 0

whois

rational
Mar 7, 2015
2,523
119
✟3,336.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Did I not hear correctly ?

ie: That they flew to the moon on the equivalent of a Dragon Computer



yes, most of the computing power was on the ground.
most of the rest was on "padds" that ha to be hand entered by the astronauts.
the on-board apollo computers had no disk drives but employed ferrite core memory.
the word length was 16 bits but could only address 32K.

so yes, we went to the moon on the equivalent of the dragon 32.
keep in mind that NASA had a vast amount of ground based computational power though.
most of this stuff was done on the ground, then relayed to the astronauts or was entered from the PADDS.

source: computers in spaceflight: the NASA experience. CH2 computers on board the apollo spacecraft.
 
Reactions: davedajobauk
Upvote 0

OGM

Newbie
Mar 22, 2010
2,561
153
✟26,065.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I am a pilot and used to work providing the uplink of services to satellites. I can most definitely say with 100% certainty the earth is NOT flat. If it were...my great circle route and orbital calculations would be WAYYYY off.

Not good if you have to move a satellites position or navigate an aircraft without ending up in the ocean.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

whois

rational
Mar 7, 2015
2,523
119
✟3,336.00
Faith
Non-Denom
i rechecked my source for errors and i see none.
but i am confused.
my source says the word length was 16 bits, which theoretically could address 64K, but it distinctly said the core rope memory was only 32K.
 
Upvote 0

morse86

Junior Member
Aug 2, 2014
2,215
619
38
✟67,758.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
[/QUOTE]


Where exactly would you go? You cannot trust GPS to take you to the edge, it is a controlled system (It probably doesn't even work there). The average person does not know where to go. They would need a ton of resources just to get to the edge (if they could find it). Look at all the failed expeditions to explore antarctica further.

You can circumnavigate a flat earth...just like a spherical earth. It's all about perception.

We have a national hero, going on a public TV program and stating that antartica is full of resources. This man took a task force of more than 4000 military personnel and ships and aircraft to antarctica (Operation Deep Freeze, Operation Deep Freeze II, Operation High Jump).

Look at the U.N logo. Why would they use a flat earth map projection WITH a leaf encircling the land masses? The leaf is suppose to be antarctica.


 
Upvote 0

morse86

Junior Member
Aug 2, 2014
2,215
619
38
✟67,758.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others


You're a pilot? This guy is also a pilot....a military one and he confirms it is a flat earth:


Look at the horizon, it's completly flat. The chopper is not adjusting for curvature when trying to land on the ship.

Notice there is no kind of distortion on the horizon. All of the NASA videos have horizon distortions (either due to CGI or type of lens used).
 
Upvote 0

whois

rational
Mar 7, 2015
2,523
119
✟3,336.00
Faith
Non-Denom
some excerpts from my source:
The choice of a 1 6-bit word size was a careful one.

Data storage was as fractions (all numbers were less than one).

Tray A held the logic circuits, interfaces, and the power supply, and tray B had the memory, memory electronics, analog alarm devices, and the clock, which had a speed of one megahertz.

The use of bank registers enabled all of the machine's memory to be addressed. The largest number that can be contained in 12 bits is 8,192. The fixed memory of the Apollo computer contained over four times that many locations.

Fixed memory leapt to 24K and then finally to 36K words, and erasable memory had a final configuration of 2K words.
 
Upvote 0

davedajobauk

dum spiro spero
Site Supporter
Dec 26, 2006
55,183
28,520
77
Salford, Greater Manchester. UK
✟300,707.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Yes, it amazes me just how accurate they needed to be
to fire up their rockets, at the exact moment of their take-off 'window'
so that they could rendezvous with the moon, which was somewhere
between; 225,623 miles (363,104 kilometers) and 252,088 miles (405,696 km) from Earth
The Apollo 11 spacecraft, had to travel at least 7 miles per second (11.25 km/s)
to break free of Earth's gravitational field. This speed is 32.4 times as fast as the speed of sound
('Mach 32.4"). and for comparison purposes >> The average bullet travels at 2,500 feet per second (around 1,700 mph). [some 0.4734848 of a mile ~per second]
Which means, they travelled at something-more than 14 times the speed of a bullet
(incredible) AND, after, travelling that enormous distance, they really managed
to 'get themselves' CAPTURED, by the Moon's gravity (one-sixth of Earth's gravitational pull)
and 'did-not'... go on 'falling' into deep space (Truly Spectacular)

to the Dragon Computer




Not being an astronaut.... I wouldn't know whether the following statement is true (or not)
But it's claimed that astronauts are subject to only 3g's [three times gravity. experienced, on the surface]
http://www.spaceanswers.com/space-e...astronauts-experience-during-a-rocket-launch/

For some reason to do with the acceleration to, escape velocity
(14+ times, the speed of a bullet]
I get the feeling that 3g's is, an understatement
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0