Flat Earth Theory.

[Apple Sky]

Gods word does not say what you claim. Your words are not His. And when someone disagrees with you, it becomes arguing against God.

So God doesn't mention there is a firmament over us with waters above ?
So God doesn't mention that he placed two great lights & the stars in the firmament ?
So God doesn't mention that earth is unmovable ?
So God doesn't mention that he bound up the seas ?
So God doesn't mention that he took a line to measure the earth ?
So God didn't mention that he placed the earth on foundations ?

I reckon you should try reading your Bible again.

 

[Phil G]

So God doesn't mention there is a firmament over us with waters above ?
So God doesn't mention that he placed two great lights & the stars in the firmament ?
So God doesn't mention that earth is unmovable ?
So God doesn't mention that he bound up the seas ?
So God doesn't mention that he took a line to measure the earth ?
So God didn't mention that he placed the earth on foundations ?

I reckon you should try reading your Bible again.

He also mentioned making the clouds His chariot. Where are these chariot clouds with God on them?

 

[Phil G]

So God doesn't mention there is a firmament over us with waters above ?
So God doesn't mention that he placed two great lights & the stars in the firmament ?
So God doesn't mention that earth is unmovable ?
So God doesn't mention that he bound up the seas ?
So God doesn't mention that he took a line to measure the earth ?
So God didn't mention that he placed the earth on foundations ?

I reckon you should try reading your Bible again.

And answer the fact that Auguste Piccard clearly referred to the earth as a globe.

I told you that Auguste Piccard referred to the earth as a globe. You challenged me to show you where he did this. Amongst other links, I gave you a link to his own book where he clearly refers to the earth as a globe. You chose not to acknowledge that but tried to ridicule anti-flat earth websites. The link to his book is not an anti-flat earth website. You deflected so you wouldn’t have to admit you were wrong.

 

[Apple Sky]

And answer the fact that Auguste Piccard clearly referred to the earth as a globe

He can say what he likes but this doesn't stop the fact of what he said in the Popular Science magazine of 1933.

 

[Phil G]

He can say what he likes but this doesn't stop the fact of what he said in the Popular Science magazine of 1933.

He never said the earth is flat. And he wrote his book after that magazine. He always referred to the earth as a globe. Yet you won’t admit it. Every decent person will hold their hand up and admit they were wrong when caught saying something wrong. But you persistently refuse to do so. Why is that? What’s wrong with acknowledging you were wrong?

 

[Apple Sky]

He also mentioned making the clouds His chariot. Where are these chariot clouds with God on them?

Put it into context do.

Psalm 104:3
He wraps Himself in light as with a garment; He stretches out the heavens like a tent, laying the beams of His chambers in the waters above, making the clouds His chariot, walking on the wings of the wind. He makes the winds His messengers, flames of fire His servants.

 

[Apple Sky]

He never said the earth is flat. And he wrote his book after that magazine. He always referred to the earth as a globe. Yet you won’t admit it. Every decent person will hold their hand up and admit they were wrong when caught saying something wrong. But you persistently refuse to do so. Why is that? What’s wrong with acknowledging you were wrong?

I'm not wrong of the fact of what he said in the magazine.

 

[Phil G]

Put it into context do.

Psalm 104:3
He wraps Himself in light as with a garment; He stretches out the heavens like a tent, laying the beams of His chambers in the waters above, making the clouds His chariot, walking on the wings of the wind. He makes the winds His messengers, flames of fire His servants.

Making the clouds His chariot is the same context as verse 5. There’s no ‘like’ or ‘as’ in the context of the clouds. And there’s no ‘like’ or ‘as’ in the context of Him walking on the wings of the wind either. These are straightforward statements, just the same as verse 5. They are not similes.

You insist that v5 is taken literally, so the chariot clouds and wind wings where God stands and walks must also be literal, if you’re being honest and consistent that is.

 

[Phil G]

I'm not wrong of the fact of what he said in the magazine.

You are wrong in the implication that he saw a flat earth. He said in the video I linked (also not an anti flat earth link) that he would have been able to see the curve had he had a ruler (for a straight edge, not a measurement)

 

[Apple Sky]

He never said the earth is flat.

He said 'it looked flat with upturned edges'.

 

[Phil G]

He said 'it looked flat with upturned edges'.

But he still called it a globe. He called it a globe because all the evidence points to a globe. So you can’t use his visual impression of what the earth looked like to promote your flat earth when he had no doubt it is a globe.

It’s really very simple. All you have to say is that while he said it looked flat with upturned edges, he still insisted it is a globe. That’s being honest. But you won’t say that. You keep trying to defend your flat earth. That’s dishonest.

 

[Apple Sky]

It’s really very simple. All you have to say is that while he said it looked flat with upturned edges, he still insisted it is a globe. That’s being honest. But you won’t say that. You keep trying to defend your flat earth. That’s dishonest.

I will keep on defending the level stationary earth b/c I know it's true.

 

[Phil G]

I will keep on defending the level stationary earth b/c I know it's true.

No you don’t know it’s true. At best, you only think it’s true.

And if you continue to defend it in the face of proven facts like Piccard insisting it is a globe, or the basic laws of physics, or basic astronomy, or basic telecommunications, the list goes on, then you are a dishonest person.

Your claimed knowledge of it being flat is entirely based on inconsistent interpretations of Scripture (which you then wrongly claim to be God’s own words) and a naive trust in conspiracy theorists who exhibit a profound lack of understanding of reality in anything they say. And because you parrot the same conspiracy theories that they spout, that same ignorance is there in your posts. And you can’t answer any of the responses you get because you don’t know any more than what the conspiracy theorists say.

 

[trophy33]

So God doesn't mention there is a firmament over us with waters above ?
So God doesn't mention that he placed two great lights & the stars in the firmament ?
So God doesn't mention that earth is unmovable ?
So God doesn't mention that he bound up the seas ?
So God doesn't mention that he took a line to measure the earth ?
So God didn't mention that he placed the earth on foundations ?

I reckon you should try reading your Bible again.

Bible is a book, its not God.

 

[trophy33]

This would take forever as everything NASA has ever done has been faked except for the building of rockets which end up going up as far up as the stratosphere & then straight back down into the Pacific Ocean, (Bermuda Triangle to be exact)
So Don't bother showing me anymore NASA video's, as I've seen enough from theses clowns.

Show me a proof of your absurd claims. If you have none, you are the clown.

Are these girls NASA?

In our times, when literally anybody can send relatively cheaply a cam into space, use GPS, a satellite TV or buy a telescope, your NASA conspiracy paranoia is unattainable. Even children can prove you wrong - your type of the "billion dollars NASA conspiracy" is a relic of a very distant past.

 

[trophy33]

@Apple Eye
I am still waiting for any evidence of the flat earth - a photograph, a video footage (you can use a balloon as many students did and attach a camera to it) or at least a realistic CGI which will present our world in detail. So far you gave nothing, nada, nill.

Also, I am still waiting for your explanation how all the fake balloon-satellites work exactly in the way they are supposed to work on the orbit of the globe. Who operates the balloons, who is faking the satellites of private companies and why you cannot see and photograph any such balloons in the skies. And how can balloons keep the precise formation like the Musk's skylink.

 

[Jipsah]

@Apple Eye
I am still waiting for any evidence of the flat earth - a photograph, a video footage (you can use a balloon as many students did and attach a camera to it) or at least a realistic CGI which will present our world in detail. So far you gave nothing, nada, nill.

None that you'll look at, anyway. Who cares? You wanna believe the earth is flat, wear yourself out. In the great scheme of things it means precisely nothing.

Also, I am still waiting for your explanation how all the fake balloon-satellites work

They don't, because they're imaginary. Just like your "Ice wall". <ROFL>

 

[Jipsah]

What edge are we talking about ?

The imaginary ice wall.

 

[Jipsah]

There is no edge, the earth continues on from the south & the north, but lets not get into this yet as Level Earth is hard enough to explain to you guys at the mo.

Aw, go ahead. I'm keen to hear this one.

 

[Jipsah]

This would take forever as everything NASA has ever done has been faked except for the building of rockets which end up going up as far up as the stratosphere & then straight back down into the Pacific Ocean, (Bermuda Triangle to be exact)

Oh no, the Flatties have moved Bermuda to the Pacific Ocean!

So Don't bother showing me anymore NASA video

I dunno, it's probably not any more futile than trying to find where exactly Bermuda is in the Pacific Ocean.

's, as I've seen enough from theses clowns.

Yeah, they probably think Bermuda is still in the Atlantic.

I think I'll go ragchew with my mate in Queensland, just to see if long path is open on 20 meters tonight.

73 de Jipsah.