- Jan 30, 2004
- 23,247
- 2,778
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
*Ethical violation removed*
Oh look. Racist violates attorney-client privilege because Negroes Are Scary.
And readers of White Nationalist websites cheer.
Upvote
0
*Ethical violation removed*
I have read plenty of articles like this, and those ones at least had the honesty to say, "I was a liberal, not now".
That 'liberal' is a racist.
I am not a bit surprised. I have the same attitude to strangers, and the fact that certain cultures are this different catches me unprepared.... I've seen black scum. I've also remember a black water polo player on the Cal Tech team, A black surgeon I played rugby with while in Grad School at UCLA. A black church lady down in watts who hunted me down at the end of the day to make SURE I got my knife back...
I've seen black scum. I've also remember a black water polo player on the Cal Tech team, A black surgeon I played rugby with while in Grad School at UCLA. A black church lady down in watts who hunted me down at the end of the day to make SURE I got my knife back. (Post Rodney King riots, the Irish Honkey, e.g. me, was the only one there with a knife and it can be difficult to open boxes of food bare handed). At least a dozen more black rugby players all good guys and most college graduates and not from second rate schools.
I understand why you say it. I think the context of the rest of the article would shed light on why he does not precede every mention of who he is discussing with the same disclaimer. I am trying to do that, though, because I know how some people will attach that to whatever I say on the subject if I don't. I cannot count on people to see all of what I say in context.Well let's look at how he closed:
...
No qualifications, just black.
That looks like textbook racism to me and I'd hazard and rational person.
Meh.
Keep saying that if it makes you feel better. The rest of us have stopped becoming alarmed when we hear shouting about wolves.
actually, it was racial differences...
which demonstrates that the author is a racist.
But somehow those cultural differences are always tied to Blackness.
He uses the blacks he meets as defendants in the court system as a defining set for the entire race. And remember he only meets the ones he is defending as public defender. The somewhat smarter ones can afford better representation.
I understand why you say it. I think the context of the rest of the article would shed light on why he does not precede every mention of who he is discussing with the same disclaimer. I am trying to do that, though, because I know how some people will attach that to whatever I say on the subject if I don't. I cannot count on people to see all of what I say in context.
Again, the article is speaking specifically about people this fellow had defended in criminal cases. He starts by showing percentages by race, and goes to discussing the DEFENDANTS on that basis. That he does not start every sentence with that disclaimer should not be taken as a secret attitude that is defied in the man's very description of how he came to the conclusion and arrived at this understanding.
When you can't make a reasoned response, just cry racism.
I can see that, but does it negate how that is EXACTLY what he spend his many hours doing? It may be distorting, and may tend toward having a prejudicial attitude, but is that the same as racism? Is he NOT doing the very thing that gives him the perspective of being the last or ONLY hope these people have in a courtroom where their future, or their very LIFE, is on the line?... The "White Man's Burden" aspect struck me as well, as if he is a proud martyr for doing his part to support those not willing to support themselves.
We are not prepared as egotistical and self center little babes, completely controlled by the nature we inherit from parents, to make anything else our priority. That is why we see little children crying because parents refuse to buy them a toy or treat when they are in the store. The child has put value on what he sees, and attached himself to the item with the affections, and it is like ripping the very heart out of the child to tell them, "No!"
As you know full well, a person who is a racist thinks those things for ALL circumstances. This fellow would find it difficult to work with a black lawyer if what is being alleged here were actually true. Racism is not a selective thing. The person who is racist feels that way about the person because of his race (college rugby player or gang banger...)It's sooooo racist!
As you know full well, a person who is a racist thinks those things for ALL circumstances. This fellow would find it difficult to work with a black lawyer if what is being alleged here were actually true. Racism is not a selective thing. The person who is racist feels that way about the person because of his race (college rugby player or gang banger...)
Just because you might use some common sense, and be particularly cautious one time, or in certain situations, does not qualify you as a racist! I have experience that should have taught me some of these lessons years ago, but reading the experiences this fellow had, opened my eyes to what I should expect in certain situations.
Oh look. Racist violates attorney-client privilege because Negroes Are Scary.
And readers of White Nationalist websites cheer.
keith99 said:He uses the blacks he meets as defendants in the court system as a defining set for the entire race. And remember he only meets the ones he is defending as public defender. The somewhat smarter ones can afford better representation.
keith99 said:I've seen black scum. I've also remember a black water polo player on the Cal Tech team, A black surgeon I played rugby with while in Grad School at UCLA. A black church lady down in watts who hunted me down at the end of the day to make SURE I got my knife back.
JustMeSee said:I did not cry about anything. The guy is a racist, plain for all to see.
SoldierOfsomething said:Ad homenim. He shared his personal experience. Make of that what you will.
JustOneWay said:Not ad hominim. I quoted his words. Yes, he shared his personal racist views and I determined he is a racist. Granted, he still wants to help blacks as others might help a poor animal, yet it is nonetheless racist.