Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
My word. Do you actually think the vaccines caused as many deaths as the disease? Your question implies that.When you calculated this yourself what factor (ie %)did you allow for known complications associated with the pharmacological intervention?
I think they are not scientists.Dunno, do you have to have work published to be a scientist? My guess is every day they are scientists. I thought science was 'the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the natural and physical world, or knowledge obtained about the world by watching it carefully (Dictionary Cambridge)
or
the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation, experimentation, and the testing of theories against the evidence obtained."the world of science and technology (Google)
0r
Science is the pursuit and application of knowledge and understanding of the natural and social world following a systematic methodology based on evidence (the science council)
You think they are not scientists?
Not only were they experimenting with coronaviruses, the specific change which makes Covid unique (insert of FCS) was part of a grant proposal to DARPA from the same people involved with the research at the WIV.The furin cleavage site....
So this site is the viruses' main advantage in mutating. The spike protein holds the space for the insertion on other genome sequences. There's three ways this could happen....
1. Random chance. This is ruled out as it would defy everything we currently understand about viral pathology. The sequence is too long.
2. Recombination with other viruses or proteins inside a host. This is the one that researchers are claiming to look for....but only one similar virus shares 3 parts of the 12 part coded sequence that exists in covid. The other 9 parts don't exist in any known viruses....which is why they seem to have some difficulty in finding the species that covid "jumped" from.
3. In a lab. Why would anyone do this in a lab? Well to study the virus and plan for a possible future outbreak. Fortunately, we don't do that sort of thing in the US....it's too dangerous. We outsource it to China...and other labs around the world. If people found out that we had actually done the work in creating this disaster....heads would roll....
Fortunately, even though we know that this gain of function research was happening at this particular lab where the outbreak started....the people involved in funding the research have assured everyone that it didn't come from the lab....which was just unfortunate enough to be involved in the very unique coincidence of researching corona viruses with gain of function research in Wuhan at the time an outbreak of covid happened....in Wuhan. Nope, it came from the wet market lol.
When considering the plausibility of a conspiracy theory, consider the plausibility of the given explanation not considered a conspiracy theory. Either something extremely unlikely happened involving a virus we've never seen nor cannot find led to this new virus spontaneously manifesting in the exact same city they were doing research on this virus and mutating it deliberately.....
Or, you know, the conspiracy theory version of it leaking from the lab.
If the mainstream version of events sounds ridiculously stupid....and the conspiracy theory isn't only far more plausible, but you actually can read the emails of experts, see them colluding despite wildly disagreeing days earlier, and you know that the media literally covered for them by silencing other experts and pushing the approved narrative....
Well really...what won't you believe? Do you also think Epstein killed himself?
With all due respect, how can you tell an engineered pathogen from a natural one?
Could be worth asking the 'one you knew' if he has data for the number of cardiac episodes/cardiac morbidity/ cardiac fatalities in, lets say an age range of 18-40, with no co-morbidities and comparing the results between people who have had specific pharmaceutical interventions with those who have not.I knew one of the people gathering data for my state's health department.
John 14:30The world has no "ruler"
I have a little experience of funding applications and my masters degree was in research methodology so again some experience but not a lot. How about you?What experience do you actually have with the funding of science? Is it none, or less?
I am concerned that if certain trigger words are used over a certain frequency then this may results in said sites not featuring so well on searches, so it is out of respect for the web site owners that I avoid some wordsCan’t bring yourself to call this “pharmacological intervention” a “vaccine”?
Yes, television was more complicated than radio, well spotted!
That is an unjustified extrapolation of what I said.My word. Do you actually think the vaccines caused as many deaths as the disease? Your question implies that.
Really? You wrote this:That is an unjustified extrapolation of what I said.
When you calculated this yourself what factor (ie %)did you allow for known complications associated with the pharmacological intervention?
Could be worth asking the 'one you knew' if he has data for the number of cardiac episodes/cardiac morbidity/ cardiac fatalities in, lets say an age range of 18-40, with no co-morbidities and comparing the results between people who have had specific pharmaceutical interventions with those who have not.
I have a little experience of funding applications and my masters degree was in research methodology so again some experience but not a lot. How about you?
How can you say with a straight face that far right activist, drug addict and woman hater Jordan Peterson does not have a political agenda?
He's famous for it: he repeatedly and incorrectly regurgitates Blythe to appeal to incels, Oath Keepers and the misogynist wing of the GOP. It's literally what he is known for.
smh
I’m going to go out on a limb here and say this results from the reporter not knowing how hypothesis testing works.
Nothing to back up these claims huh?Pull the other one it's got bells on.
I have written many grants and reviewed them for many years. Given your experience I am a little shocked you choose to propagate a tale of corruption about funding processes.
Today I learnt that accuracy is political.
It is when one political party touts "alternative facts" as a basis of their policy decisions.Today I learnt that accuracy is political.
Neither is Bill Gates, Leonardo DeCaprio, or any other of the "famous" people who think we should listen to them just because they have money.Well then you're going to need to find other people. Peterson is not an expert on any of this and both of their political agendas are well documented.
No they weren't. Grifters like ex M.D. Andrew Wakefield have been censured appropriately.Real doctors were presenting hard facts from "boots on the ground" experiences.. and were hushed up and bullied due to going against the "Truth" presented by the government, WHO an WEF puppets who were paid to tell lies.
There are many doctors that spoke out against the actions of people like Fauci and, in Canada, Theresa Tam... Well, they tried but were shut down.No they weren't. Grifters like ex M.D. Andrew Wakefield have been censured appropriately.
Did you see what that Pfizer employee claimed regarding those statements? That because he was on a date....he was just trying to impress her?There are many doctors that spoke out against the actions of people like Fauci and, in Canada, Theresa Tam... Well, they tried but were shut down.
These were doctors in the trenches, boots on the ground.
Not doctors that were paid off by the governments and big Pharma to push the vaccines and other mandates.
If you don't think that this was an agenda of the mega powerful, then I cannot help you.
A Phizer employee was caught admitting that Phizer was using the vaccines to create mutations.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?