No, in other words there is archaeology. Archaeology doesn't mean uncovering a scene by scene diorama of the events. But it establishes the existence of the settings and the premise of the written accounts which then lends credence to those written accounts.
Yes, I'm compelled by history. Guilty.
As per artivle- " is there archaeological evidence? In short, no"
I dontbneedva lesson on what archaeology is. You ever been outvto,
taken part in, a dig?
The " archaeology" for Joseph Smiths gold books is similarly
compelling. Eye witness sworn testimony, detailed history of
the setting, complete transcript of the books.
All that is missing is the books themselves.
Like the actual " exodus " that way.
Now, if the idea is that the books were miraculous in nature,
and inspired J smith to write them
That the red sea crossing, desert wandering etc was all miraculous,
you dont need and surely will not get evidence.
One believes in miracles according to how compelled they
FEEL to do so, not by the evidence of real gold books or
chariot wheels in the seabed, for lo, there be none.
But be thou comforted by these Signs, for if truly
" compelled", if Proof incarnadine you should'st behold,
then Faith be made naught.
In brief -there is never evidence for anything supernatural
in the bible.
Some say its because of the need for faith.
I think its the other way around-
The way it is for every other religion or superstition.