• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Excluding Farmer's Market Vendor for Refusing to Host Same-Sex Weddings

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
33,143
19,442
29
Nebraska
✟678,273.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Can you articulate why this comparison has caused you “offense”?
It's offensive to compare race (something you can't choose) to sexual behavior (something you can choose).
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
33,143
19,442
29
Nebraska
✟678,273.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Therefore “no gay wedding events”?
There’s some parts missing, I’m almost sure of it.
No. I was referring to homosexuals being promiscuous.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,045
13,595
Earth
✟231,702.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
It's offensive to compare race (something you can't choose) to sexual behavior (something you can choose).
How about sexual orientation, does one “choose that” too?
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
33,143
19,442
29
Nebraska
✟678,273.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
How about sexual orientation, does one “choose that” too?
Depends who you ask. Many in the LGBT community now say it's a choice.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
33,143
19,442
29
Nebraska
✟678,273.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Until 2016 what choice did they have with regards to legal monogamy?
They are still promiscuous regardless of legal monogamy. They do not care about their relationships. I've seen it. Lord, have mercy.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
33,143
19,442
29
Nebraska
✟678,273.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Cite these “many” please.
Just from personal observation. I have nothing to cite. Besides, sexual behavior and sexual orientation are not the same.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,045
13,595
Earth
✟231,702.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
They are still promiscuous regardless of legal monogamy. They do not care about their relationships. I've seen it. Lord, have mercy.
Eddie Fisher was married five times, Mickey Roonie seven.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
33,143
19,442
29
Nebraska
✟678,273.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Eddie Fisher was married five times, Mickey Roonie seven.
You're right. Don't forget Elizabeth Taylor.

But I have a brother who is active in the lifestyle. I've seen how it destroyed him. Which is why I am vocal against it. IT breaks my heart.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,045
13,595
Earth
✟231,702.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Just from personal observation. I have nothing to cite. Besides, sexual behavior and sexual orientation are not the same.
We agree that sexual behavior and sexual orientation are not the same.
Most heterosexual aren’t monogamous either…but we needn’t run that rabbit hole.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
33,143
19,442
29
Nebraska
✟678,273.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
We agree that sexual behavior and sexual orientation are not the same.
Most heterosexual aren’t monogamous either…but we needn’t run that rabbit hole.
agreed...that's a whole different can of worms...
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,180
✟544,347.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Except that scripture never said interracial marriage was sinful. It does say homosexual sex is.

And here I thought the talking point was that this was about making cakes for gay weddings.

Funny how the spin keeps changing each time an argument in favor of discriminating against gay people get shot down.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,180
✟544,347.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Except the actual people we're hosting an actual event that the baker didn't want to participate in.

I doubt anyone was trying to force the baker to come to the wedding. They just wanted to buy a cake.

He didn't want to create a contract with them for the event they were holding.

And he only had that objection after learning about the orientiation of the customer.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,180
✟544,347.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Hers a quote of you bearing false witness again. No one has claimed you can't bake cakes for a minority group.

Then gay customers can buy wedding cakes just like straight customers? Because I've seen a lots of discussion about how selling the same cakes to the wrong types of customers is very very damaging to their religious freedom or something.

If that were true, no LGBT people could by any cake from the baker.

I'm not sure where this idea is that one must discriminate in every single case for discrimination to occur.
I always thought it was when a business decided which customers to sell to based on the traits of the customer.

That's a deliberate falsehood and a deliberate misrepresentation. Seriously dude you are just either trolling or gaslighting. Take your pick.

I do continue to appreciate the need to try to make this about me. It just shows how weak these far right talking points are that every post is an attempt to distract the thread with fabrications.

Hers what the scriptures say about this.

try to determine what will please the Lord. Have nothing to do with the deeds produced by darkness, but instead expose them, for it is shameful even to speak of the things these people do in secret. But everything exposed to the light is revealed clearly for what it is, since anything revealed is a light. This is why it says,“Get up, sleeper! Arise from the dead,and the Messiah will shine on you!” Therefore, pay careful attention to how you conduct your life — live wisely, not unwisely. Use your time well, for these are evil days. So don’t be foolish, but try to understand what the will of the Lord is.
Bible Gateway passage: Ephesians 5:10, Ephesians 5:11, Ephesians 5:12, Ephesians 5:13, Ephesians 5:14, Ephesians 5:15, Ephesians 5:16, Ephesians 5:17 - Complete Jewish Bible


See that?

I see nothing about not selling cakes to gay customers in there. I mean, sure, if one were motivated one might be able to extract some sort of justification for doing so, even while ignoring a whole bunch of other customers who also sin.
Kinda like how in previous generations, verses were used to justify other preexisting opinions about who businesses didn't want to sell to.

The more things change...
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,180
✟544,347.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Back-in-the-day the conversation would go like this:

I have nothing against homosexuals, but they tend to be promiscuous

Well, they kind of forced into that because we don’t let them get married

Two men cannot be married!

That’s only by convention; if they were allowed to be married, then they wouldn’t be promiscuous

But if we allowed the to be married then how could we still maintain that their lifestyle is evil?

I thought you said you had a problem with their promiscuousness?

They’re homosexuals, that’s all I need to know, I don’t wanna think about this anymore!
That, plus the conspicuous lack of applying these same standards to customers who aren't gay. Almost as if it's all just rationalizations for the real reason, a reason which is trying to be hidden for some reason. It's really strange that would be necessary, given all the talk about how the businesses supporting discrimination are morally superior and all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,180
✟544,347.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
We could do away with “public accommodation laws” altogether!
Win-win!
Learn from history?
Never!
I'm sure separate but equal will work this time around ... it'll be different, you know, because reasons and such.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,180
✟544,347.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
It's also rampant in the heterosexual community. I've seen it.
Yeah, but that's a sin a majority of people who agree with me might be involved in. Making a big deal virtue signaling against the bigger sin might lose me too many customers.
 
Upvote 0