Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If every mutant from the first cyanobacterium to the first man was a penny, theoretically you should have quintillions of dollars.
But in fact, you have barely enough money to buy a pamphlet that says you've been had.
You can only daisy-chain cyanobacteria-to-man on paper.
If I'm wrong, show me two dollar's worth of evolution.
Creationism cannot be refuted, so his name tag isn't arrogant.
The only way to refute/disprove creationism is if you had a time-machine.
Only on paper.But every scientific claim made by Creationists - about the age of the earth, about evolution being false, etc. - has been utterly refuted.
If every mutant from the first cyanobacterium to the first man was a penny, theoretically you should have quintillions of dollars.
But in fact, you have barely enough money to buy a pamphlet that says you've been had.
You can only daisy-chain cyanobacteria-to-man on paper.
If I'm wrong, show me two dollar's worth of evolution.
It's not hard to entertain you guys --I gotta tell you, every time you say "daisy chain" I laugh a little.
It's not hard to entertain you guys --
about the age of the earth, about evolution being false, etc. - has been utterly refuted.
There are creationists who believe the earth is billions of years old.
Also since evolution has not been proven, how can you say someone who claims evolution is false has been refuted?
The only way you can prove evolution is if we observe macroevolution. However its never been observed.
So you can continue to believe in fairytales...
The Preservation of Favoured Races and Mein Kampf are pro-evolution, aren't they?Research1, what evolutionary biology textbooks have you read that are pro-evolution?
No.The Preservation of Favoured Races and Mein Kampf are pro-evolution, aren't they?
The Preservation of Favoured Races and Mein Kampf are pro-evolution, aren't they?
Darwin was a Christian, was he? or did he just favor them over the Jews?Yup. They are both pro Christian as well.
Darwin was a Christian, was he? or did he just favor them over the Jews?
I'm not sure he was what you might consider an evangelical christian, but he was encouraged to try the clergy after he literally didn't have the stomach for the barbarism he witnessed at "medical" school. He was a naturalist at heart, and so pursued those interests. He ended his life as an unbeliever.Darwin was a Christian, was he? or did he just favor them over the Jews?
Darwin was a Christian, was he? or did he just favor them over the Jews?
I'm not sure he was what you might consider an evangelical christian, but he was encouraged to try the clergy after he literally didn't have the stomach for the barbarism he witnessed at "medical" school. He was a naturalist at heart, and so pursued those interests. He ended his life as an unbeliever.
I don't think any evidence to support the claim of Darwin being a racist or bigot exists, at least that I'm aware of.
Good --I don't think any evidence to support the claim of Darwin being a racist or bigot exists, at least that I'm aware of.
Good --Yes. That would be why he studied to be a preacher.
Yes -- (the remark between the commas notwithstanding).You are aware that the vast majority of scientific advancements, even the ones that you decry, are discovered by Christians?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?