• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Evolution is a Lie

Status
Not open for further replies.

Split Rock

Conflation of Blathers
Nov 3, 2003
17,607
730
North Dakota
✟22,466.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
If every mutant from the first cyanobacterium to the first man was a penny, theoretically you should have quintillions of dollars.

But in fact, you have barely enough money to buy a pamphlet that says you've been had.

You can only daisy-chain cyanobacteria-to-man on paper.

If I'm wrong, show me two dollar's worth of evolution.

LOL... all you want is 200 intermediates? I think we can give you that. But then, you would demand to "see" the fossils for yourself. Then you would claim they all "look like plastic." We already played this game before.... haven't we?

How about you show us Adam and Eve, Noah, Moses, David, Samson, Joshua, Saul, Joseph, Mary and Judas?
 
Upvote 0

Lion Hearted Man

Eternal Newbie
Dec 11, 2010
2,805
107
Visit site
✟26,179.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Creationism cannot be refuted, so his name tag isn't arrogant.

The only way to refute/disprove creationism is if you had a time-machine.

Yeah, as a whole, Creationism cannot be disproven. Thus it is an unscientific idea as a whole. But every scientific claim made by Creationists - about the age of the earth, about evolution being false, etc. - has been utterly refuted.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,570
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,482.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
But every scientific claim made by Creationists - about the age of the earth, about evolution being false, etc. - has been utterly refuted.
Only on paper.
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
48
Burnaby
Visit site
✟36,546.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
If every mutant from the first cyanobacterium to the first man was a penny, theoretically you should have quintillions of dollars.

But in fact, you have barely enough money to buy a pamphlet that says you've been had.

You can only daisy-chain cyanobacteria-to-man on paper.

If I'm wrong, show me two dollar's worth of evolution.

I gotta tell you, every time you say "daisy chain" I laugh a little.
 
Upvote 0

Research1

Polygenist Old Earth Creationist
Feb 14, 2011
314
2
England
✟476.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
about the age of the earth, about evolution being false, etc. - has been utterly refuted.

There are creationists who believe the earth is billions of years old.

Also since evolution has not been proven, how can you say someone who claims evolution is false has been refuted?

The only way you can prove evolution is if we observe macroevolution. However its never been observed.

So you can continue to believe in fairytales...
 
Upvote 0

Lion Hearted Man

Eternal Newbie
Dec 11, 2010
2,805
107
Visit site
✟26,179.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
There are creationists who believe the earth is billions of years old.

Also since evolution has not been proven, how can you say someone who claims evolution is false has been refuted?

The only way you can prove evolution is if we observe macroevolution. However its never been observed.

So you can continue to believe in fairytales...

I know there are Old Earth Creationists. But no matter how many times you say "its not been observed guyz" doesn't make it true.

Research1, what evolutionary biology textbooks have you read that are pro-evolution? You said you've read "everything" so it should be pretty easy to name a few.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,570
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,482.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Research1, what evolutionary biology textbooks have you read that are pro-evolution?
The Preservation of Favoured Races and Mein Kampf are pro-evolution, aren't they?
 
Upvote 0

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Darwin was a Christian, was he? or did he just favor them over the Jews?

You're a Christian, aren't you, AV -- you've favored yourself over the Jews many times over.

What difference does Darwin make -- save that he was a better and smarter man than you?
 
Upvote 0

CaliforniaSun

Well-Known Member
Feb 24, 2011
2,104
41
✟2,613.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Darwin was a Christian, was he? or did he just favor them over the Jews?
I'm not sure he was what you might consider an evangelical christian, but he was encouraged to try the clergy after he literally didn't have the stomach for the barbarism he witnessed at "medical" school. He was a naturalist at heart, and so pursued those interests. He ended his life as an unbeliever.

I don't think any evidence to support the claim of Darwin being a racist or bigot exists, at least that I'm aware of.
 
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
30,638
15,085
Seattle
✟1,140,440.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Darwin was a Christian, was he? or did he just favor them over the Jews?


Yes. That would be why he studied to be a preacher. You are aware that the vast majority of scientific advancements, even the ones that you decry, are discovered by Christians?
 
Upvote 0

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
I'm not sure he was what you might consider an evangelical christian, but he was encouraged to try the clergy after he literally didn't have the stomach for the barbarism he witnessed at "medical" school. He was a naturalist at heart, and so pursued those interests. He ended his life as an unbeliever.

I don't think any evidence to support the claim of Darwin being a racist or bigot exists, at least that I'm aware of.

AV's just pretending that the book's title is racist -- when at this point, even he knows better.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,570
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,482.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yes. That would be why he studied to be a preacher.
Good -- :)
You are aware that the vast majority of scientific advancements, even the ones that you decry, are discovered by Christians?
Yes -- (the remark between the commas notwithstanding).
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.