PsychoSarah
Chaotic Neutral
Um ... maybe you'd better read that again.
I'm not Thaumaturgy.
My bad. Well, I will agree with you on that one, the force required for such a thing to happen would be ridiculous.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Um ... maybe you'd better read that again.
I'm not Thaumaturgy.
From how far out though?
Rocks are only said to be old because scientist say they are. God never put signs on things saying "this rock is 50 million years old" and then smirked because it really wasn't. I dont serve a God like that.I fact check what I read
Also, it isn't just looking at the formations (although this does reveal a lot), but even if that were just the case, they shouldn't look old if they aren't. After all, if god is omnipotent and omniscient, this means not one detail was made without it knowing about it and the consequences, and making a decision. Why make the decision which will result in the bible apparently conflicting with observations?
Rocks are only said to be old because scientist say they are. God never put signs on things saying "this rock is 50 million years old" and then s[bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]ed because it really wasn't. I dont serve a God like that.
You were the one who claimed it torpedoed, I was going off of that.
Also, plant life and rock patterns, amongst other things, are evidence that indeed India broke away.
LLoJ once again heads for Wiki!Um ... maybe you'd better read that again.
I'm not Thaumaturgy.

Rocks are only said to be old because scientist say they are. God never put signs on things saying "this rock is 50 million years old" and then smirked because it really wasn't. I dont serve a God like that.
Good.Reality doesn't give a fig about what you have a "serious problem" with...
Ya ... all that evidence.Lie...
Rocks are said to be old because of the EVIDENCE that they provide of their age...it doesn't matter what scientists, priests, electricians, teachers, or even Tasmanians "say" about the age of the earth...the ONLY thing that matters is what the evidence says...
Ya ... all that evidence.
That's why we have seven different moon models -- everyone cares what all that evidence says -- (to them).
Reality doesn't give a fig about what you have a "serious problem" with...
Your "problems" can take a hike in the face of the evidence from the real world....
Instead of a huge mountain rise in elevation over a long period of time, I am inclined to believe for a massive change in location of land mass (Flood aftermath) and subsequent settling of earth's equilibrium over a short period. (This would make some go up and some go down)
Disputations do have a measure of entertainment value, do they not?I love this thread!
Do we have 7 different currently accepted ages for the earth which aren't religiously based? No? Huh, I guess we have enough evidence for that to avoid much disagreement and alternative theories.
backatchaYou're welcome to believe what you want. Your beliefs, however, will not effect reality one iota.
They need some good eye salve and ear dropsNo, no...he's fine on this one....because what the dolt doesn't realise is that his pet barbs actually serve to support the scientific method..................
Compare this with his miserable view....he is stuck in time. Nothing moves forward....no new knowledge is countenanced.
He has to hold his hands over his ears, screw his eyes up tight and hope that his 'wall of ignorance' that he prayed for from his god will hold....
So you believe nothing -that's cool![]()
So you believe nothing -that's cool![]()