Evolution Exposed

[Goonie]

Heres the explanation for the tissue http://m.livescience.com/41537-t-rex-soft-tissue.html
Unlike religion when science sees a discrepancy it investigates and incorporates the new evidence.

Just think if the old testement declared that before the fall adam and eve flouted on air we would be debating the theory of gravity. Lol.

Why do I bother debating, well it concerns me how religon impacts peoples view on science and how to interpretbwhat ot tells us, for example climate science.

 

[Goonie]

It points to microevolution.

But then it doesn't stop there.

Just like Jehu went overboard with his commission to eliminate the house of Ahab, evolution goes overboard and makes shipwreck of Genesis 1.

Ah but when you multiply all those micro-evolutions over millions of years you get macro.

 

[Alithis]

Is the theory of gravity wrong because it doesn't include God? Is the complicated science behind the device you are reading this on wrong because it doesn't include God?

The majority of Christians worldwide accept evolution.

nope they don't accept that at all. its a very american thing actually .
and gravity is a law set in place and it is an unchangeable fact ...yes ? hmm and yet the deciles watched the lord JEsus ascending in the clouds ... absolutely ruling over the law of gravity .. you see he is the truth and the truth is not subject to facts and that is why faith also is not governed by science because one must cast off a measure of faith to embrace science .
but hey ..due to you not displaying any christian title or non christian title in your profile i do not know if im speaking to an atheist or not .. but based only upon your posted material here id say your non christian .- its difficult to tell when one is replying to multiple people

 

[AV1611VET]

Ah but when you multiply all those micro-evolutions over millions of years you get macro.

That is true -- and that's why it's wrong.

Evolution is nothing more than a game of connect-the-dots.

 

[Alithis]

actually im trying to UNwatch this thread. but when you quote me ..it alerts me even if iv clicked "unwatch" ..must be a setting to fix that some how ??

 

[AV1611VET]

actually im trying to UNwatch this thread. but when you quote me ..it alerts me even if iv clicked "unwatch" ..must be a setting to fix that some how ??

Try this link: http://www.christianforums.com/watched/threads/all

 

[Alithis]

Heres the explanation for the tissue http://m.livescience.com/41537-t-rex-soft-tissue.html
Unlike religion when science sees a discrepancy it investigates and incorporates the new evidence.

Just think if the old testament declared that before the fall adam and eve flouted on air we would be debating the theory of gravity. Lol.

hahahaha thats funny .. or .. we will just desperate lie because we don't want to admit.. our dating system is entirely flawed and always has been

"iron in the dinosaur's body preserved the tissue before it could decay." ouhh that tickled me ..of course i bet its not been found to be the case ever before but heck we will quickly make it the case because my goodness people will figure out weve been wrong all along so quick lets spin doctor this fast before the masses realize we've been wrong all along ..ouhh evolution and atheism. ya just cant trust them

 

[Goonie]

That is true -- and that's why it's wrong.

Evolution is nothing more than a game of connect-the-dots.

Hey I've just connected the dots it Australopithecine! Now on to the next one I think it might be Homo Habalis.

 

[florida2]

nope they don't accept that at all a very american thing actually .
and gravity is a law set in place and it is an unchangeable fact ...yes ? hmm and yet the deciles watched the lord JEsus ascending in the clouds ... absolutely ruling over the law of gravity .. you see he is the truth and the truth is not subject to facts and that is why faith also is not governed by science because one must cast off a measure of faith to embrace science .
but hey ..due to you not displaying any christian title or non christian title in your profile i do not know if im speaking to an atheist or not .. but based only upon your posted material here id say your non christian .- its difficult to tell when one is replying to multiple people

What don't they accept? What is a particularly American thing?

Gravity is a scientific theory subject to change and revision like any other theory, like evolution, germ thory and atomic theory etc

I am a christian, just one who thinks and looks at evidence.

 

[Alithis]

It points to microevolution.

But then it doesn't stop there.

Just like Jehu went overboard with his commission to eliminate Baal worship in Israel, evolution goes overboard and makes shipwreck of Genesis 1.

i dont believe in any from of evolution . but i do believe in GOd ... hey thanks for the link on how to unwatch .. i will try that now

 

[AV1611VET]

Hey I've just connected the dots it Australopithecine! Now on to the next one I think it might be Homo Habalis.

Congratulations.

Now compare your dots to Luke 3 and see if there's a discrepancy.

[VERSE=Luke 3:38,KJV]Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.[/VERSE]

 

[AV1611VET]

hey thanks for the link on how to unwatch .. i will try that now

You're welcome!

 

[Alithis]

What don't they accept? What is a particularly American thing?

Gravity is a scientific theory subject to change and revision like any other theory, like evolution, germ theory and atomic theory etc

I am a christian, just one who thinks and looks at evidence.

your a christian ? aah well ..who would've guessed .hmm

 

[The Cadet]

aah there is that bias again ..fossil dating .. who made the measure which said its millions of years old ?

It's made on the basis of radiometric decay, and our understanding of how it works. So it boils down to the same problem as before - was radiometric dating somehow different in the past? Well, we have no way of knowing. What we do know is that no way is currently known to accelerate radiometric decay. It seems to be a constant. So did god change it in the past? Why would he do that, knowing that later on it would confuse the heck out of us? The only bias here is towards reality.

 

[Goonie]

hahahaha thats funny .. or .. we will just desperate lie because we don't want to admit.. our dating system is entirely flawed and always has been

"iron in the dinosaur's body preserved the tissue before it could decay." ouhh that tickled me ..of course i bet its not been found to be the case ever before but heck we will quickly make it the case because my goodness people will figure out weve been wrong all along so quick lets spin doctor this fast before the masses realize we've been wrong all along ..ouhh evolution and atheism. ya just cant trust them

Congratulations.

Now compare your dots to Luke 3 and see if there's a discrepancy.

[VERSE=Luke 3:38,KJV]Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.[/VERSE]

hahahaha thats funny .. or .. we will just desperate lie because we don't want to admit.. our dating system is entirely flawed and always has been

"iron in the dinosaur's body preserved the tissue before it could decay." ouhh that tickled me ..of course i bet its not been found to be the case ever before but heck we will quickly make it the case because my goodness people will figure out weve been wrong all along so quick lets spin doctor this fast before the masses realize we've been wrong all along ..ouhh evolution and atheism. ya just cant trust them

Ah so when scientists discover an error in dating they are scientists, for example two different carbon dates for a mammoth hide, but when they investigate the interesting peesence of organic matter in fossils they are spin doctors. Pardon me whilst I laugh.
Evolution has stood up to 160 years of debate and research. And the age of the earth is supported from multiple disciplines all of which come the same conclusion the earth is old.

 

[Alithis]

Ah so when scientists discover an error in dating they are scientists, for example two different carbon dates for a mammoth hide, but when they investigate the interesting peesence of organic matter in fossils they are spin doctors. Pardon me whilst I laugh.
Evolution has stood up to 160 years of debate and research. And the age of the earth is supported from multiple disciplines all of which come the same conclusion the earth is old.

why are you quoting the unrelated posts from others in reply to me ?? bit confusing that .
and hey stop quoting me im trying to unwatch this thread lol.

 

[Goonie]

why are you quoting the unrelated posts from others in reply to me ?? bit confusing that .
and hey stop quoting me im trying to unwatch this thread lol.

Sorry, using a kindle and miss typed.

 

[AV1611VET]

Evolution has stood up to 160 years of debate and research. And the age of the earth is supported from multiple disciplines all of which come the same conclusion the earth is old.

After how many tries?

How much trial-and-error went into solidifying the theory of evolution?

And how much computer programming, tool calibration, employment of No True Scotsman, and Bible exclusion goes into keeping it solidified?

 

[Goonie]

After how many tries?

How much trial-and-error went into solidifying the theory of evolution?

And how much computer programming, tool calibration, employment of No True Scotsman, and Bible exclusion goes into keeping it solidified?

True, but they also excluded the Koran, Buddhist texts, Hindu texts, let's not forget the ancient egyptian texts. This is science not theology and the words of Iron Age tribesmen have as bearing as that of the Roman doctor Galen on modern medicine.

Science is trial and error from Newton to Einstein. Hypotheses are proposed and tested and retested as technology and "hopefully" understanding improves.

 

[AV1611VET]

True, but they also excluded the Koran, Buddhist texts, Hindu texts, let's not forget the ancient egyptian texts.

What goes around, comes around ... right?

Throw the baby out with the bathwater?