justlookinla
Regular Member
Your guesses and suppositions of how bacterial flagellum and tactile sensory units were formed.
How are designed elements products of naturalistic processes?
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Evolution and the myth of "scientific consensus"
- Thread starter lifepsyop
- Start date
- Status
Your guesses and suppositions of how bacterial flagellum and tactile sensory units were formed.
How are designed elements products of naturalistic processes?
And what are they?
If natural processes can produce the elements of design, then they aren't elements of designer. That's what you can't seem to understand.
River systems are complex, functional, and have purpose. They have all of the supposed elements of design, yet they are the product of natural processes. Your claims have been falsified.
Upvote
0
Oncedeceived
Senior Veteran
Position envy? That really did make me laugh. You seem to be forgetting that your belief is based on very general evidence and rhetoric. You accept stories about theories that try to explain what is observed.
Upvote
0
Oncedeceived
Senior Veteran
You do realize that my four year old grandson does this same thing all the time. It clearly indicates that you are at a loss and must revert to the equivalent, "my dog is better than yours", "no my dog is better than yours".
Upvote
0
If all we have left are guesses and suppositions, then wouldn't that make ID a guess and/or supposition?
Upvote
0
Oncedeceived
Senior Veteran
I have no problem with evolution as biological defined. It becomes a problem things are claimed about it that are not in evidence. I have a problem more with materialists/atheists using science and evolution as a explanation of all life forms and systems therein when there is no physical evidence to show that and what evidence there is supports these life forms and systems appear to be designed with a purpose.
Upvote
0
Oncedeceived
Senior Veteran
The evidence is for design, it is not for a blind, purposeless process with no goals or plans.
Upvote
0
Yet you have no problem with the claim that bacterial flagella are designed when you have zero evidence to back it.
Upvote
0
Oncedeceived
Senior Veteran
The evidence is that it appears designed with a purpose. That is the evidence, when are you all going to get that?
Upvote
0
Oncedeceived
Senior Veteran
The evidence that shows that life forms and systems appear to be designed for a purpose.
Upvote
0
- Status
Similar threads
