Evidence of Election Fraud

[LostMarbels]

Who didn't vote in what people? What are you even talking about?

Then why are we having the conversation?

 

[Pommer]

I find it overwhelming that these election frauds only happened in states where Biden was declared the winner!

Did I say “overwhelming”?
Yeah, I meant “silly”.

 

[LostMarbels]

I find it overwhelming that these election frauds only happened in states where Biden was declared the winner!

Did I say “overwhelming”?
Yeah, I meant “silly”.

So? How do you affect my life?

Nothing is stopping the Dems from dropping evidence to prove fraud concerning Reps.

 

[Speedwell]

So? How do you affect my life?

Nothing is stopping the Dems from dropping evidence to prove fraud concerning Reps.

The Democrats don't have any more evidence that the Republicans committed massive voter fraud than the Republicans have that the Democrats did.

 

[Speedwell]

We, do not have a Queen. No one in America voted these people into office to be the ruling class. A form of power structure that is formed by s small group of people is an Oligarchy. Good ol boys club. We do not hold to feudalism here neither as if there is some sort of caste system.



I see no issue with that within his own term. I have issues considering people reaming in influence for some 80 years. And then they get so comfortable they actually believe they are the ruling class... passing their crown down to their next generation.

Can you name any of these people?

 

[LostMarbels]

Can you name any of these people?

I have many times... I even said it was rumored Brennan's trial was going to be on TV.

 

[Speedwell]

I have many times... I even said it was rumored Brennan's trial was going to be on TV.

John Brennan is one of a small group of people who secretly control the country? What are their goals? What do they propose to do with this power?

 

[KCfromNC]

That is sick. I would never accuse you of such a thing, nor would I ever act against this country.

You're posting wild conspiracy theories whose goal is to overturn the results of an election. It is hardly a leap of faith.

 

[TLK Valentine]

 

[LostMarbels]

You're posting wild conspiracy theories whose goal is to overturn the results of an election. It is hardly a leap of faith.

That is your opinion.

 

[TheBear]

The irony and hypocrisy doubles upon itself....

Thank you for sharing.

 

[TLK Valentine]

That is your opinion.

More of an observation.

 

[LostMarbels]

More of an observation.

Yeah... same difference. Thanks for pointing that out for whatever reason....

 

[TLK Valentine]

The irony and hypocrisy doubles upon itself....

Thank you for sharing.

Indeed it does. None of us have forgotten how Donald created an election fraud commission after the 2016 election, in order to root out the "massive voter fraud" which cost him the popular vote.

...nor have we forgotten how that commission found absolutely no evidence of any such fraud -- a testimony to the election process' integrity, and/or the commission's incompetence.

Now, here we are, with Donald claiming, once again, "massive voter fraud," this time costing him the electoral vote as well.

It takes a special breed of mark to fall for the same con twice.

 

[TLK Valentine]

Yeah... same difference. Thanks for pointing that out for whatever reason....

View attachment 289658

The connotations are different. an "observation" is more likely to be based on something observed, whereas "opinions" can come from anywhere, including but not limited to, for example, a psychotic breakdown.

 

[TheBear]

Indeed it does. None of us have forgotten how Donald created an election fraud commission after the 2016 election, in order to root out the "massive voter fraud" which cost him the popular vote.

...nor have we forgotten how that commission found absolutely no evidence of any such fraud -- a testimony to the election process' integrity, and/or the commission's incompetence.

Now, here we are, with Donald claiming, once again, "massive voter fraud," this time costing him the electoral vote as well.

It takes a special breed of mark to fall for the same con twice.

It was all a conspiracy theory ... just refer to the two year and millions of dollars Mueller investigation, which all tax payers paid for. Was that an attempt to subvert a Constitutionally elected President? How about Gore's attempt in 2000?

Please stop with the double standards.

 

[Speedwell]

It was all a conspiracy theory ... just refer to the two year and millions of dollars Mueller investigation. Was that an attempt to subvert a Constitutionally elected President?

No. And the Mueller investigation turned a profit, all while coming to the same conclusions about Russian involvement as an investigating committee in the Republican-led Senate. BTW, that the Mueller Investigation was about proving Trump colluded with the Russians is a shopworn lie long since debunked and overtaken by subsequent events. You've got to keep up with these things.

How about Gore's attempt in 2000?

Not that, either. The difference was only a few hundred votes in a single state and the Republicans were as interested as the Democrats in a recount.

 

[TheBear]

No. And the Mueller investigation turned a profit, all while coming to the same conclusions about Russian involvement as an investigating committee in the Republican-led Senate.

1) And they all had the power to put a stop to the investigation, but they didn't. Trump could have stopped it on a dime, but he didn't. Why? Because he had nothing to hide.

2) Conflating 'Russian collusion' with 'Russian interference' is a classic deceptive diversion tactic used by the left. Not saying you're doing it. But the fact remains that the initial and MAIN charge was that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, which was an unfounded and false allegation.

 

[TheBear]

Indeed it does. None of us have forgotten how Donald created an election fraud commission after the 2016 election, in order to root out the "massive voter fraud" which cost him the popular vote.

...nor have we forgotten how that commission found absolutely no evidence of any such fraud -- a testimony to the election process' integrity, and/or the commission's incompetence.

Now, here we are, with Donald claiming, once again, "massive voter fraud," this time costing him the electoral vote as well.

It takes a special breed of mark to fall for the same con twice.

Disparaging and belittling vast swaths of Americans aside, (which borders on goading), let me ask. In your mind, should widespread, strange and peculiar election irregularities be investigated? Or, are you satisfied that since your man came out on top as a result, there's no need for anything further?

 

[TLK Valentine]

It was all a conspiracy theory ...

The Conspiracy theory forum is that-a-way...

just refer to the two year and millions of dollars Mueller investigation, which all tax payers paid for.

Muller's investigation resulted in a net gain of money after the convicted forfeited their assets.

Was that an attempt to subvert a Constitutionally elected President?

No, it was an investigation into criminal activity.... of which plenty was found.

How about Gore's attempt in 2000?

The one with the actual evidence which showed that Gore actually won Florida, and thus the election, had SCOTUS not voted 5-4 along party lines to stop the count?

Please stop with the double standards.

If you're going to post distractions, at least insure that said distractions actually help your case, and not dig you a deeper hole.

On the plus side, you're probably eligible for a spot on Rudy's team with that level of legal acuumen.