• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Charlie24

Newbie
Oct 17, 2014
2,306
963
✟111,231.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
I'm not suggesting you push your stand. It's a discussion so it's expected that you will offer your point of view, perspective, reasons, counter arguments etc. I'm not asking you to fight about this nor am I suggesting that you are obligated to change your point of view based on anything said here. I think what makes these disagreements so difficult to watch is that people often fall back on implications that the opposing side is somehow spiritually inferior just because they disagree. The implication is that the Lord is on my side and since we can't both be right the Lord is not on your side. I don't think God's point of view is that black/white and I don't think that kind of thing is helpful when attempting to arrive at the truth. In other words, I think we all have areas where we can be right with God while at the same time have areas where we can have a wrong understanding, and even within those two categories there can be a long spectrum of gray between the right and wrong of each.

I think at some point we should be able to agree to disagree, but we seemed to have reached that point rather early in the piece between you and me and I don't know why that is, since I feel I have tried to treat your arguments with respect despite disagreeing with them.

In this context, I hope you won't mind if respond to the points you've made in the quote above and I hope you will feel encouraged to respond to my counter arguments. I think it's fine that you felt peace about having made a decision as to what you believe about the pre vs post trib rapture issue.

However, comments like, "I don't think twice about it" or "there is no 'what if'" suggest that you're not really open to hearing, or even considering alternative points of view. For example, I am willing to think twice about it. Every time I discuss this issue with others I believe I do try to hear what the other person is saying in the event that I may have missed something along the way. Look back at my posts on this thread and you will see that I've addressed most of what the opposition has had to say and I give clearly defined reasons for that position does not make sense; not just that I disagree, but why it doesn't make sense to me.

I think we all need to have second thoughts about every aspect of our walk with God, especially since we don't have perfect understanding of all truth. The "what if" is there to remind us of that. What if I have got it wrong? If I'm in a place where I have decided there can be no second thought whatsoever, then how can I possibly hope to overcome whatever misunderstanding I'm having? I'm applying this to more than just the current disagreement about the rapture and I'm suggesting this should apply to all Christians, including me. I'm quite sure I have a wrong understanding on several issues, though I'm not aware of the specifics. To me, that is what all learning is about. My job is to think twice, thrice and however many times it takes to search out those wrong understandings.

This should be especially true for those areas where we believe we are the most right, because those are the areas we are least likely to revisit with renewed examination as to whether or not we really do have it all worked out. It is not a sign of faith to be stubbornly opposed to thinking twice about a position for which we have strong conviction. It is the opposite of faith to stop thinking, to stop questioning, and to stop what if'ing.

This is why I suggested, in my earlier post to straightshot, how so many Christians could end up taking the Mark of the Beast. IF they are wrong about their pre-trib position, then they will end up going through the trib and they will end up facing the Mark. But, if they've settled it in their heart that there is no way they could possibly be wrong, then they will not see the Mark as the Mark. They will think, "since there's no way I can be wrong, this thing about to be put on my hand so that I may continue to buy/sell cannot possibly be the Mark; God promised that I would not need to face it therefore there should be no problem with me accepting this thing on my hand". It will not be that God somehow broke his promise that these Christians will end up being condemned for taking the Mark, but rather that they became stubborn and hard hearted, unwilling to re-examine their position and as a result made bad decisions.

This is why it is so very dangerous to confuse a stubbornness with conviction and faith. It's like the "name it and claim it" miracles, where people claim to have been healed when really they have not. They see the claim as evidence of faith that God will someday heal them, but when talking to others they must PRETEND that they've been healed as a sign of their faith. If they honestly say, "no I haven't been healed yet but I believe God will someday" then it's the equivalent of letting go of the claim and therefore shows a lack of faith. They've made stubbornness and dishonesty into a sign of real faith.

Taking the position that, "I have made a decision about what I know to be the truth and have vowed to never think about it again" is the worst place a seeker of truth can be.

Will you please reconsider you position on refusing to think about the alternatives and the what if's?

I appreciate your concern, I believe it's genuine and I thank you.

Don't think that I haven't weighed the consequences of facing the great tribulation head on, I have. That is where my peace came from, I went to the scriptures to search for the truth. It didn't happen over night, in fact, it took years. I'm not the brightest bulb on the tree, but that's ok, God isn't looking for intelligence, He's looking for those who will dare to trust Him by blind faith.

I could go through the usual scriptures pointing out what I believe to be the truth concerning the rapture. But what hit me like a brick wall during my studies was the character of God. God began to reveal who He is. I've never been able to get over how much He cares for us. How the scripture says He is continually watching over us, He knows the number of hairs on our heads, our conversation and thoughts of Him are recorded in heaven. So, I began to concentrate my study, as much as possible, on the nature of God in general. I learned that His righteousness demands judgment and His judgment is righteous. His righteous judgment at times must be carried out by His awesome wrath. The question is, what creates this wrath, and to whom or what is it directed. This is very important seeing that the scripture declares "the great day of His wrath is come and who shall be able to stand?" Rev. 6:17

Paul tells us what creates the wrath of God.
Rom. 1:18-23
"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things."

Ungodliness and unrighteousness is what inflames the wrath of God.

Nahum 1:2
God is jealous, and the Lord revengeth; the Lord revengeth, and is furious; the Lord will take vengeance on his adversaries, and he reserveth wrath for his enemies.

God reserves His wrath for His enemies. Who is Gods enemy.

James 4:4
Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.

The enemy of God is the friend of the world, but Christ has chosen us out of the world.

John 15:19
"If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you."

Those who are in Jesus are not of the world. You are NOT subject to Gods wrath.

It can't get any clearer than this!
Rom. 5:8-10
"But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.
For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life."

I know, I know, you don't have to tell me. We're going to get caught up in definitions, interpretations, and doubts, well, I don't know, so and so said so and so. But that's the reason I don't do this anymore! I say my part and move on.
 
Upvote 0

Charlie24

Newbie
Oct 17, 2014
2,306
963
✟111,231.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Hi Riberra. The opposing argument which charlie and straighshot are putting forward is that the Matthew 24 verse refers to Jesus coming back only for the Jews (who went through the tribulation). The 1 Corinthians 15 and 1 Thess 4/5 verses, they suggest, are referring to the Christians being raptured before the Great Tribulation.

Their suggestion, apparently, is that there are two separate raptures, one for the Christians before the Trib and one for the (unbelieving?) Jews after the Trib. I made the point, earlier, about how all three instances make reference to a "trumpet" and how, in particular, Paul's 1 Corinthians 15 reference specifically mentions the "last" trumpet.

Charlie's response to that was that the last trumpet Paul was referring to was a trumpet heralding the end of the church age and not a reference to the last of the 7 trumpets of the tribulation. It's when I asked Charlie to provide some clarification/evidence of this claim that he decided he didn't want to argue about these issues, though I'm still keen to hear the explanation.

I appreciate the invitation my friend, but I don't care for beating my head against the wall today. There is never enough clarification to suit anyone on this subject.
 
Upvote 0

Endtime Survivors

prophecy link in my profile!
Apr 4, 2016
1,400
458
Africa
Visit site
✟38,238.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I know, I know, you don't have to tell me. We're going to get caught up in definitions, interpretations, and doubts,

Well, of course definitions and interpretations are a significant part of understanding the world around us. I think "getting caught up in them" is our best chance of understanding God's will. In an earlier post I gave a counter argument to the idea that the Great Tribulation equates to wrath, in that they are not the same thing. The issue is not pre vs post wrath, but rather pre vs post tribulation.

There are plenty of examples of Christians going through persecution and suffering for their faith. Where that tribulation/persecution comes from isn't really the issue, but rather that God not only allows, but often expects us to show a willingness to suffer for our faith. It just doesn't make sense to me that Jesus can teach so much about standing up for our faith, taking up our cross, seeking to lose our life, turning the other cheek, overcoming through sacrifice etc, and then take all his followers out of harm's way just when the world will need their shining example the most.

Yes, God loves us, but I don't think that love will stop him from exposing us to harsh truths, either about ourselves or for the sake of being a witness to others. Did you see that reference I made to the saints in the Revelation who overcome the beast by the testimony of Jesus and by not loving their lives even unto death? That's how they overcame. God's love expressed itself though the practical example of showing that there is something more important in this life than preserving the physical body; integrity, character, courage, backbone. These are concepts which often can only be expressed because of hardship, trials, persecution, and/or tribulation.

I definitley believe God will not give us more than we can take and that there will be some measure of protection as he sees fit, but this idea of taking all Christians away from any kind of tribulation because he loves them too much to ask them to suffer for their faith just isn't consistent with the overall spirit of Jesus' teachings. God doesn't cease to be loving if he asks his servant to suffer for righteousness sake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Luke17:37
Upvote 0

Straightshot

Member
Feb 13, 2015
4,742
295
57
✟23,734.00
Faith
Christian
My comment

The Lord's intent to call His true ecclesia of both the dead in Christ and those living at the time is all about His schedule

The day of the Lord is coming and His first action will be to punish the world for refusing to believe the truth about Him .... and He will rule the earth Himself in the aftermath

He has no intent to punish His true ecclesia with the same punishment .... no purpose

And He says that He will keep the living ones from His unprecedented wrath in that day

There are those who deny this truth thinking that they must be persecuted by this particular objective of His intent to rid the world of unbelief

Believe that there is a difference between the trials and tribulation of this present life and the days that He will bring His unrelenting judgment upon humanity

He also tells that the first believers of the tribulation will be the 144000 of Israel .... there will be no other believers on the earth at the beginning

Revelation's view then switches from the earth to heaven and His true immortal ecclesia are seen there .... and the same are seen several times after as Revelation unfolds giving the details of the tribulation events upon the earth

The 144000 will witness to the world of His soon coming millennial kingdom upon the earth and some will turn and believe .... and most of these will be martyred

Some will survive the tribulation and will enter and populate His coming kingdom as mortals

Here is what is going on today among the professing "church" divides .... the particular argument against the Lord's promise above and His schedule for the end of this present age

The question is why? .... what is the root cause of this strange and unwarranted defiance?

I will get right to the root .... Satan is the one who has fomented the doubt and calls the Lord a liar on the matter .... this is a habit of his objective to destroy men by keeping them in the dark and at the same time discrediting the Lord

This devil knows that he is a target for the Lord's destruction and that he will be sent to the earth during the tribulation period where he will be allowed to hunt men and kill them before they discover their need to repent and to gain immortality

So his ambition is to mislead men into the tribulation for their ultimate destruction

He also knows that professing Christianity is filled with people who think they are saved and they are not saved .... pretenders caught up in the confusing dogmas of the various divides of the professing "church"

So do not let the devil deceive you .... if you think you are going in and find yourself there in the conditions that will prevail during the tribulation, you will be confronted with deceptions and extreme devastation not conducive for a man's turning

If Satan and his minions snuff you out before, you will end up here [Revelation 20:11-15]
 
Upvote 0

miknik5

"Let not your heart be troubled"
Jun 9, 2016
15,728
2,819
USA
✟109,054.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I am sorry but my comment is that when the two are trying to communicate everyone else should step aside


By posting long posts again it just AGAIN adds to the confusion

I for one would like to hear FIRST the discussion between Charlie and ES and I myself personally would have waited before adding my own interjection

We all have something to say
I have something to say
I know to you it is gibberish, straight shot
 
Upvote 0

Straightshot

Member
Feb 13, 2015
4,742
295
57
✟23,734.00
Faith
Christian
Not a valid request for all others to refrain

If you don't want to read the posting of others to the thread topic you can continue your private discussions and read them later

Otherwise what you want could tie up a particular thread topic for an extended period of time

.... and nothing is "gibberish" to me

I read all postings on topics of interest whether I agree with the poster or not
 
Upvote 0

Endtime Survivors

prophecy link in my profile!
Apr 4, 2016
1,400
458
Africa
Visit site
✟38,238.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I am sorry but my comment is that when the two are trying to communicate everyone else should step aside


By posting long posts again it just AGAIN adds to the confusion

I for one would like to hear FIRST the discussion between Charlie and ES and I myself personally would have waited before adding my own interjection

We all have something to say
I have something to say
I know to you it is gibberish, straight shot

Hi Miknik. I agree that long posts rarely add much to the debate, though I'm usually one of the most guilty for long posts. :)

I think straightshot is right in that we can't limit who contributes, but I think the content of what is contributed should make a difference, and I've not seen anything new in his post; more of the same "god won't make us go through wrath". It's fine to present such an argument, but counter arguments have already been put forward to address that theory and he's not responding to those counter arguments except to say,

Believe that there is a difference between the trials and tribulation of this present life and the days that He will bring His unrelenting judgment upon humanity

which I suppose is at least something, though there's no satisfying explanation as to how this statement fits with the other statements about the Great Tribulation equating to wrath. His argument is that Christians won't need to suffer for their faith because God won't make us face his wrath which necessarily equates tribulation to wrath, but then he says he believes there is a difference between trials/tribulation and the "unrelenting judgment upon humanity (i.e. God's wrath). The two do not conform into a consistent theory.

I believe the inconsistency is that neither charlie nor straighshot can justify arguing that God never allows his followers to face persecution and tribulation, (even unto death at times), but they also want to escape the Great Tribulation. The only way to meld the two is to interpret "great" tribulation as wrath in only that one instance (i.e. in all other instances of saints facing persecution/tribulation, it is not God's wrath). There is no consistent explanation as to why tribulation should equate to wrath in only that one circumstance (i.e. the Great Tribulation), but even if there was an explanation for it, how would that explanation conform with the fact that the Revelation itself clearly delineates between tribulation (i.e. the 7 trumpets) and wrath (i.e. the 7 vials)?

In the context of the bigger picture, it just makes no sense to equate tribulation to wrath.
 
Upvote 0

Straightshot

Member
Feb 13, 2015
4,742
295
57
✟23,734.00
Faith
Christian
"but then he says he believes there is a difference between trials/tribulation and the "unrelenting judgment upon humanity (i.e. God's wrath). The two do not conform into a consistent theory."


Not what I said

The coming tribulation of the Lord's directed and unprecedented wrath upon an unbelieving world is different ..... different than the trials and tribulations of this present life

Most people have these things, some more than others, during their life time

But the coming tribulation of the Lord's intent to take vengeance upon a world laced with sin and unbelief is going to be very different and for a different purpose .... not unlike the flood of Noah's day [Matthew 24:36-39; Luke 21:20-36; Jude 1; Revelation 6:12-17]

So you misquoted me for some reason .... I always explain the difference with regard to His coming judgment upon the whole earth and the ordinary trials and tribulations of this present life

If you want to go there .... and it is a good chance that you will by your position on the matter .... you need to rethink about where you stand with the Lord

He will not send any of His true ecclesia to receive His unmitigated vengeance as He tells, and there would be no reason for Him to do it [1 Thessalonians 5:1-9; Revelation 3;10]
 
Upvote 0

miknik5

"Let not your heart be troubled"
Jun 9, 2016
15,728
2,819
USA
✟109,054.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi Miknik. I agree that long posts rarely add much to the debate, though I'm usually one of the most guilty for long posts. :)

I think straightshot is right in that we can't limit who contributes, but I think the content of what is contributed should make a difference, and I've not seen anything new in his post; more of the same "god won't make us go through wrath". It's fine to present such an argument, but counter arguments have already been put forward to address that theory and he's not responding to those counter arguments except to say,



which I suppose is at least something, though there's no satisfying explanation as to how this statement fits with the other statements about the Great Tribulation equating to wrath. His argument is that Christians won't need to suffer for their faith because God won't make us face his wrath which necessarily equates tribulation to wrath, but then he says he believes there is a difference between trials/tribulation and the "unrelenting judgment upon humanity (i.e. God's wrath). The two do not conform into a consistent theory.

I believe the inconsistency is that neither charlie nor straighshot can justify arguing that God never allows his followers to face persecution and tribulation, (even unto death at times), but they also want to escape the Great Tribulation. The only way to meld the two is to interpret "great" tribulation as wrath in only that one instance (i.e. in all other instances of saints facing persecution/tribulation, it is not God's wrath). There is no consistent explanation as to why tribulation should equate to wrath in only that one circumstance (i.e. the Great Tribulation), but even if there was an explanation for it, how would that explanation conform with the fact that the Revelation itself clearly delineates between tribulation (i.e. the 7 trumpets) and wrath (i.e. the 7 vials)?

In the context of the bigger picture, it just makes no sense to equate tribulation to wrath.
in response to this. Thank you and yeah. If we weren't going to face trials Christ wouldn't have had to warn
(((((HIS BODY)))))

To overcome

Especially since there would be no tribulations if
(((((HIS BODY)))))
Has been raptured
 
Upvote 0

miknik5

"Let not your heart be troubled"
Jun 9, 2016
15,728
2,819
USA
✟109,054.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Make sure that you catch them when the come down
I don't have to do anything just as ES explained

Why would I go out if I know and have heard The Voice of The Shepherd now?
 
Upvote 0

miknik5

"Let not your heart be troubled"
Jun 9, 2016
15,728
2,819
USA
✟109,054.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
oh oh and I know what is required of the saints who as John has already said who have entered into the patient sufferings of the kingdom

Patient and patience being the key word

As well remaining in Him and not going out from Him
 
Upvote 0

Ronald

Exhortations
Site Supporter
Jul 30, 2004
4,620
981
southern
✟111,578.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The trumpet that Paul speaks of in 1Thes. 4 is not the 7th trumpet of Rev.

John had not written the Revelation of Jesus Christ at this time and the Thes. church would have no knowledge of it. Paul knew through his own revelation from Christ (which he writes about) what would happen in the last days, but not one time did he tell the church they would suffer this wrath. In fact, he told them "for we are not appointed to wrath, but to obtain salvation of our Lord Jesus Christ." 1Thes. 5:9

Paul was speaking to the church of what would befall them. The trumpet he speaks of is the closing of the church age when the true church is taken out of the way.
I beg to differ with you. Last trumpet means last trumpet. If it were after the 7 trumpets in Rev., it would be the 8th. If it were before the 7 trumpets, it wouldn't be called the last. God does not appoint us to wrath true, but the wrath of God is in the 7 Bowls which are released at the sound of the 7th/last trumpet. So we do not suffer wrath, we suffer tribulation, which we have always experienced.
"Then I saw another sign in heaven, great and marvelous: seven angels having the seven last plagues, for in them the wrath of God is complete." Rev. 15:1
"...God pour out the seven bowls of God's wrath on the earth." Rev. 16:1

Great tribulation is happening right now - if you were a Christian in an Islamic country like Syria, Iraq, N. Sudan, Libya, etc. where they are chopping off heads. These Christians are experiencing genocide.
Again, Rev. 20:4 shows us that the souls that John saw in heaven had been beheaded for their testimony of Jesus and because of the Word of God.
That John had not written Revelation at any time prior to when Thes. was written is true. Revelation was written around 95 A.D. Thessalonians weren't getting the whole story of Jesus second coming, just part of it, as much of the Bible is written that way; we get bits and pieces here and there. And Paul didn't need to know the full end-time story, nor did Daniel, Ezekiel, Isaiah, Joel, or any other prophet. John's account was the last book for a future generation. I would imagine that if it had been written prior to 67 A.D. then it would be confused with the events of the fall of Jerusalem and that particular tribulation that they went through.
 
  • Like
Reactions: miknik5
Upvote 0

miknik5

"Let not your heart be troubled"
Jun 9, 2016
15,728
2,819
USA
✟109,054.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I beg to differ with you. Last trumpet means last trumpet. If it were after the 7 trumpets in Rev., it would be the 8th. If it were before the 7 trumpets, it wouldn't be called the last. God does not appoint us to wrath true, but the wrath of God is in the 7 Bowls which are released at the sound of the 7th/last trumpet. So we do not suffer wrath, we suffer tribulation, which we have always experienced.
"Then I saw another sign in heaven, great and marvelous: seven angels having the seven last plagues, for in them the wrath of God is complete." Rev. 15:1
"...God pour out the seven bowls of God's wrath on the earth." Rev. 16:1

Great tribulation is happening right now - if you were a Christian in an Islamic country like Syria, Iraq, N. Sudan, Libya, etc. where they are chopping off heads. These Christians are experiencing genocide.
Again, Rev. 20:4 shows us that the souls that John saw in heaven had been beheaded for their testimony of Jesus and because of the Word of God.
That John had not written Revelation at any time prior to when Thes. was written is true. Revelation was written around 95 A.D. Thessalonians weren't getting the whole story of Jesus second coming, just part of it, as much of the Bible is written that way; we get bits and pieces here and there. And Paul didn't need to know the full end-time story, nor did Daniel, Ezekiel, Isaiah, Joel, or any other prophet. John's account was the last book for a future generation. I would imagine that if it had been written prior to 67 A.D. then it would be confused with the events of the fall of Jerusalem and that particular tribulation that they went through.
Thank you that makes beautiful sense
 
Upvote 0

Straightshot

Member
Feb 13, 2015
4,742
295
57
✟23,734.00
Faith
Christian
"I beg to differ with you. Last trumpet means last trumpet"


The last judgment trumpet of the set of 7 closes the tribulation period

[Revelation 8:6; 10:7]

However, it is not the last, there will be one just following the days of the tribulation [Isaiah 11; 27:12-13; Matthew 24:29-31] .... this one is for the gathering of the believing mortal survivors of Israel and these will populate [reproduce in] the Lord's millennial kingdom upon the earth

Then the Lord will gather the mortal survivors of the Gentile nations and those found believing [the sheep] will enter the same, those found in unbelief [the goats] will not [Matthew 25:31-46]

There is another last trumpet call for the Lord's true ecclesia just before the tribulation begins

[1 Corinthians 15:51-58; 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18; Revelation 18:4]

The first trumpet and message to His "church" is found here [Revelation 1:10]

The Lord's voice sounds like a trumpet, like the voice of an archangel
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.