Rdr Iakovos
Well-Known Member
Ok Iak, if you say so.. thanks for your opinion on this.
QED
Your view and my view of Rev 20 had absolutely nothing to do with my saying that you folks have no assurance of your salvation.. and yet you're telling me that I do not understand.. it's obvious to me that you did not understand the subject that you jumped into after Asinner had made the initial comments.
I wasn't responding to that dialogue- Iwas responding to what you said to me.
Hey, I must agree with you on this one.. I forgot that you disagree with the catholics in transubstantiation, and you folks call it consubstantiation, isn't that right..?
As I said above, QED
You are thinking of Lutherans
So then, you do NOT take John 6 literally, as the catholics do.. is that correct..?
Again, incorrect. We literally believe it, without attempting to define it.
Thanks for pointing that out.. I do remember that there is a difference between you and the catholics.. and that is basically what it comes down to the eucharist.. again, feel free to correct my glaring mis-representation of 'the' true church of God as you endorse it..
I love the backhand part of a contrived compliment. Now, regarding the differences between us and Rome: I would be hard pressed to answer for them.
Well then, some point you've made there.. although that's nothing we didn't know already.
Glad to hear you acknowledge that your opinions on the interpretation of Rev 20 are just that- opinions.
Revelation 11 speaks of the kingdoms of this world becoming the kingdoms of our Lord and of His Christ.. this is not the case right now.. for that pertains to the things which shall be hereafter..
So says you.
Simply sharing my faith Iak, as you do yours.. scholarship has nothing to do with that, perhaps it does for you, it does not for me. The doctrine which I believe to be true are not founded upon scholars, but upon the whole counsel of scripture as it is studied and applied.
Ditto. So your triumphalistic declarations about how I or we do not understand how to interpret (fill in blank) should be tempered, I'd hazard, with a disclaimer.
Well, then thanks again for correcting them.
de nada
How one builds upon the foundation of Jesus Christ has real reward and loss associated with it. The problem is that you're confounding salvation with sanctification and how we're to walk in the spirit rather than in the flesh.
No, you're artificially separating sanctification from salvation, to your potential peril, and that of those who would hear you out.
Then this explains why you'll never has assurance, because there is no assurance in yourself. It also flat out denies the truth that nothing can separate us (the body of Christ) from the love of GOD in Jesus Christ..
On the contrary, knowing myself as I do, my only hope is Christ. Therefore my assurance is one of informed caution, not giddy antinominialism
It's also partly because you folks believe that you're placed there (into Christ) in water baptism as well.
Baptism is salvific only inasmuch as it is part of the process. A Prayer at an altar, or an inner conviction- these may be part, also. You say we are not assured, yet tell us we believe we are assured by water- which claim would you like to stick with?
Again, if you're standing upon yourself.. then it's no wonder that you have doubts.. I don't always 'feel' saved.. and I can doubt myself.. but I know that I can not sustain that which I could have never, ever, earned in the first place.
I asked the question before and you folks don't answer it..
Are you working toward your salvation ?
No, and yes. See James, and see Paul. No, and yes. Paul says Abraham was justified by faith. James says he was justified by his deeds. James and Paul do not contradict- scripture is complimentary, not contradictory.
No, and yes. I cannot achieve the remission of my sin- that is Him alone. I can receive said forgiveness, by believing and confessing. I cannot add to my merit by obeying the Law- but I can be transformed by 1. renewing my mind and 2. following Him.
And again, against this offensive charge that I "stand on myself:" I don't even stand on my own faith. I stand on the faith of Christ. But I not only stand, I follow. I do not ignore the warnings, nor do I ignore the promises.
QED
Your view and my view of Rev 20 had absolutely nothing to do with my saying that you folks have no assurance of your salvation.. and yet you're telling me that I do not understand.. it's obvious to me that you did not understand the subject that you jumped into after Asinner had made the initial comments.
I wasn't responding to that dialogue- Iwas responding to what you said to me.
Hey, I must agree with you on this one.. I forgot that you disagree with the catholics in transubstantiation, and you folks call it consubstantiation, isn't that right..?
As I said above, QED
You are thinking of Lutherans
So then, you do NOT take John 6 literally, as the catholics do.. is that correct..?
Again, incorrect. We literally believe it, without attempting to define it.
Thanks for pointing that out.. I do remember that there is a difference between you and the catholics.. and that is basically what it comes down to the eucharist.. again, feel free to correct my glaring mis-representation of 'the' true church of God as you endorse it..
I love the backhand part of a contrived compliment. Now, regarding the differences between us and Rome: I would be hard pressed to answer for them.
Well then, some point you've made there.. although that's nothing we didn't know already.
Glad to hear you acknowledge that your opinions on the interpretation of Rev 20 are just that- opinions.
Revelation 11 speaks of the kingdoms of this world becoming the kingdoms of our Lord and of His Christ.. this is not the case right now.. for that pertains to the things which shall be hereafter..
So says you.
Simply sharing my faith Iak, as you do yours.. scholarship has nothing to do with that, perhaps it does for you, it does not for me. The doctrine which I believe to be true are not founded upon scholars, but upon the whole counsel of scripture as it is studied and applied.
Ditto. So your triumphalistic declarations about how I or we do not understand how to interpret (fill in blank) should be tempered, I'd hazard, with a disclaimer.
Well, then thanks again for correcting them.
de nada
How one builds upon the foundation of Jesus Christ has real reward and loss associated with it. The problem is that you're confounding salvation with sanctification and how we're to walk in the spirit rather than in the flesh.
No, you're artificially separating sanctification from salvation, to your potential peril, and that of those who would hear you out.
Then this explains why you'll never has assurance, because there is no assurance in yourself. It also flat out denies the truth that nothing can separate us (the body of Christ) from the love of GOD in Jesus Christ..
On the contrary, knowing myself as I do, my only hope is Christ. Therefore my assurance is one of informed caution, not giddy antinominialism
It's also partly because you folks believe that you're placed there (into Christ) in water baptism as well.
Baptism is salvific only inasmuch as it is part of the process. A Prayer at an altar, or an inner conviction- these may be part, also. You say we are not assured, yet tell us we believe we are assured by water- which claim would you like to stick with?
Again, if you're standing upon yourself.. then it's no wonder that you have doubts.. I don't always 'feel' saved.. and I can doubt myself.. but I know that I can not sustain that which I could have never, ever, earned in the first place.
I asked the question before and you folks don't answer it..
Are you working toward your salvation ?
No, and yes. See James, and see Paul. No, and yes. Paul says Abraham was justified by faith. James says he was justified by his deeds. James and Paul do not contradict- scripture is complimentary, not contradictory.
No, and yes. I cannot achieve the remission of my sin- that is Him alone. I can receive said forgiveness, by believing and confessing. I cannot add to my merit by obeying the Law- but I can be transformed by 1. renewing my mind and 2. following Him.
And again, against this offensive charge that I "stand on myself:" I don't even stand on my own faith. I stand on the faith of Christ. But I not only stand, I follow. I do not ignore the warnings, nor do I ignore the promises.
Upvote
0