• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Elon Musk paying people to resister to vote: is the USA the new Moldova?

Larniavc

Leading a blameless life
Jul 14, 2015
14,353
8,765
52
✟374,977.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
“It is illegal to give out money on the condition that recipients register as voters,” Adav Noti, executive director of the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center.


Is Mr Musk taking a leaf out of the book of Russian vote buying election interference in Moldova by offering money to people if they register to vote in Georgia (not that one, the one in America) and other swing states?

Is America’s democracy the fat kid that the rich kids bully into doing their bidding by buying them sweets?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: DaisyDay

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
41,312
19,520
Finger Lakes
✟295,940.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
-​
Government, Politics is so corrupt why is this even news.
Because it is rare that someone has tried so openly to buy the government.

If Trump should be elected, there will be no legal repercussions for Musk as part of Agenda 47 is to eliminate the idea of an independent Department of Justice and make it entirely subject to the president's whims and desires.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: Larniavc
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
27,553
16,702
Here
✟1,430,684.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

I'm assuming that he has a battery of attorney's that already reviewed all of the loopholes and legal minutia and have their "defense" pre-crafted.

Sounds like the angle they're going for is claiming it's a "job opportunity"

a job opportunity, saying winners “will be selected to earn $1M as a spokesperson for America PAC.” The two winners picked over the weekend have appeared in promotional videos on the super PAC’s account on X, formerly Twitter.


It's a legal grey area, as there have been other instances (even this past year) that have involved "dangling a carrot" to try to get people to register to vote.


While it's pretty clear that Musk's little contest is specifically trying to identify and register likely Republican voters, one could make the argument that Ariana Grande, allowing people enter in a contest to attend the premier of a broadway show (and win free cosmetics from her personal line) is certainly trying to isolate and target a particular type of voter as well.


...and while the law specifically pertains to federal elections, other organizations have tried these sorts of antics in local elections in the past

Ironically enough, Trump actually tried to sue the Nevada Native Vote organization for doing something very similar...it wasn't a million bucks obviously, but they were offering Visa gift cards in "raffle format" for people who showed they voted.

(while his overall speech was riddled with conspiracy theories and fibs, the tiny nugget of it that actually had merit, that was lost in the sea of falsehoods, was that Nevada Native Vote was questionable in their gift card incentive program)

Ben & Jerry's found themselves in hot water for running such a promotion as well (and they responded to a cease&desist by just expanding their free ice cream day to everyone instead of just the people who voted lol)

But the strategy may be covered by a loophole under US election law because no-one is being directly paid to vote - despite introducing money into a process that could identify likely Trump voters.

In the US, it is illegal to provide payments to get people to vote - not only for a certain candidate, but to simply cast a ballot.

The rule prompted ice cream-maker Ben & Jerry's to give its product free to everyone on election day in 2008, having initially planned to limit it just to those with an "I voted" sticker.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
41,075
44,118
Los Angeles Area
✟985,973.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Upvote 0

Truth7t7

Newbie
Dec 20, 2012
6,506
1,858
✟158,002.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
“It is illegal to give out money on the condition that recipients register as voters,” Adav Noti, executive director of the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center.


Is Mr Musk taking a leaf out of the book of Russian vote buying election interference in Moldova by offering money to people if they register to vote in Georgia (not that one, the one in America) and other swing states?

Is America’s democracy the fat kid that the rich kids bully into doing their bidding by buying them sweets?
Would that be like Facebooks Mark Zuckerberg donating $400+ Million to election vote counting and causes with written strings attached by Zuckerberg to the monies?

Elon's $1 Million is a far cry from Zuckerbergs $400+ Million dont ya think?

NewYorkPost

Zuckerberg’s election spending was ‘carefully orchestrated’ to influence 2020 vote: ex-FEC member​

Published Oct. 14, 2021
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
41,075
44,118
Los Angeles Area
✟985,973.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Would that be like Facebooks Mark Zuckerberg donating $400+ Million to election vote counting and causes with written strings attached by Zuckerberg to the monies?
What written strings?

Anyway, from your source:

Spokesman Ben LaBolt said the Center for Tech and Civic Life, which received the bulk of the funding, “issued an open call to local election jurisdictions across the country and provided funding to all jurisdictions that applied no matter whether they were historically Republican, Democratic or swing districts.”

“More of the jurisdictions that received funding historically voted Republican than Democratic, so the facts belie the claim,” he said.
 
Upvote 0

Truth7t7

Newbie
Dec 20, 2012
6,506
1,858
✟158,002.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What written strings?

Anyway, from your source:

Spokesman Ben LaBolt said the Center for Tech and Civic Life, which received the bulk of the funding, “issued an open call to local election jurisdictions across the country and provided funding to all jurisdictions that applied no matter whether they were historically Republican, Democratic or swing districts.”

“More of the jurisdictions that received funding historically voted Republican than Democratic, so the facts belie the claim,” he said.
Roughly 1/8th of Zuckerberg's donation went to swing state Georgia, where Biden won by 11,000 votes "Fact"

Clip NYPost Article:

Former US Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga.), who lost a January runoff to Democratic challenger Raphael Warnock, also retweeted The Post’s report.

“Zuckerberg infiltrated our elections, doling out $45M in GA alone to engineer a partisan takeover of our state’s elections operations,” she wrote.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
41,075
44,118
Los Angeles Area
✟985,973.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Roughly 1/8th of Zuckerberg's donation went to swing state Georgia, where Biden won by 11,000 votes "Fact"
So no strings then? And no evidence to contradict the fact that grants were given to every jurisdiction that asked.
 
Upvote 0