'Easy to be an atheist if you agnore science' [moved]

[USincognito]

Cleaver like this?
cleaver |ˈklēvər|
noun, a tool with a heavy broad blade, used by butchers for chopping meat.
or
Cleaver |ˈklēvər|
Cleaver, Eldridge (1935–98), U.S. civil rights activist. He converted to the Nation of Islam and wrote Soul on Ice (1968) about the black experience?
or may you're just having fun with all the misspelling...

Ward, Wally, Beaver and Mrs.

 

[USincognito]

Where did the "primordial life form" come from?

It didn't come from nothing, which was my point. Would you like to explain abiogenesis to you, are you only in the business of asking trite questions?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Just keep searching, and knocking brother. You will find it, and then all you have to do is open the door.

You made the claim that the word 'agnore' was not a spelling mistake. This therefore means that you think that 'agnore' is a word. Words have definitions for them in the dictionary. So show me the definition for 'agnore'.
And drop the condescending attitude while you're at it.

 

[AV1611VET]

So show me the definition for 'agnore'.

Agnore is a portmanteau of AGGRESSIVELY IGNORE.

 

[Commander]

It didn't come from nothing, which was my point. Would you like to explain abiogenesis to you, are you only in the business of asking trite questions?

Please explain, then you may realize that it all comes from God!

 

[Commander]

Agnore is a portmanteau of AGGRESSIVELY IGNORE.

That would be the same as willfully ignorant, would it not?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Agnore is a portmanteau of AGGRESSIVELY IGNORE.

Thank you for answering me.
Although now that does bring up the question of why the OP of the link didn't actually just write that down. Admittedly though that would require mind reading powers so we can consider that a rhetorical question.

 

[AV1611VET]

Thank you for answering me.
Although now that does bring up the question of why the OP of the link didn't actually just write that down. Admittedly though that would require mind reading powers so we can consider that a rhetorical question.

Actually I made it up.

 

[Commander]

Actually I made it up.

Your a bad boy. LOL. It is a scrabble word, so it is a word. It's also the name of someone, or a baby's name.

 

[Cearbhall]

Read this and weep, atheists :

http://www.algemeiner.com/2016/08/10/its-easy-to-be-an-atheist-if-you-ignore-science/

Well, at least it's a Jewish POV for a change...

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Actually I made it up.

... cannot deny it, but I'm moderately impressed. It sounded plausible.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Your a bad boy. LOL. It is a scrabble word, so it is a word. It's also the name of someone, or a baby's name.

Since AV1611VET told a porky, the dictionary definition of 'agnore' if you please.

 

[Commander]

... cannot deny it, but I'm moderately impressed. It sounded plausible.

Me to.

 

[AV1611VET]

Your a bad boy. LOL. It is a scrabble word, so it is a word. It's also the name of someone, or a baby's name.

I stand corrected!

 

[Cearbhall]

It is not known how life got started. So what's new?

I guess there are some people who can't imagine being able to sleep at night without having an answer. I have no problem with people accepting a specific deity as an answer, but that particular subset needs to get over the fact that not everyone feels the need to do so.

 

[AV1611VET]

... cannot deny it, but I'm moderately impressed. It sounded plausible.

I thought I'd make it sound official by saying "portmanteau," instead of just saying "two words in one."

 

[Commander]

Since AV1611VET told a porky, the dictionary definition of 'agnore' if you please.

Ag-Used to express a range of emotions from irritation or grief to pleasure:
Nore(noun)-daughter-in-law
I would say that-it's a range of emotions you have for your daughter-in-law.

 

[AV1611VET]

Ag-Used to express a range of emotions from irritation or grief to pleasure:
Nore(noun)-daughter-in-law
I would say that-it's a range of emotions you have for your daughter-in-law.

Yeokay!

 

[Kenny'sID]

Kind of like how you do when trying to address the evidence for evolution.

Not true, I got the jokes completely...the ones that were based on assumption each time I looked into your ridiculous evidence..

It's hilarious when people complain about logical fallacies being pointed out and then go on to post a logical fallacy.

Details please? If you have a comment to make on my post, make it, otherwise I'll assume that a baseless accusation.

 

[Cearbhall]

If anyone is yawning and wants some longer-lasting entertainment, check out this 178-page gem of a thread: http://www.christianforums.com/threads/rebellious-women.7950822/