Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You are correct sir, that's why I say life is unfair. Affirmative action is as harmful as it is helpful. Companies that practice it will always have resentful employees and there will always be a cloud hanging over the ones who benefit from it.
I'm not advocating a government solution to the "unfairness" of upper management and CEOs in large companies being mostly white. The constitution does not guarantee "fairness" as a right, Equal is not the same as fair. What I do advocate for is that people in the high up positions that control a large number of people's employment just be aware of their tendency to hire or promote people who are more like them, challenge themselves to really seek the most qualified person based on merit, and recognize the benefits of a diverse workforce. Diverse being of different races, ages, genders, and so on.
There is something to be said for hiring people who you can relate to. You may likely have a better idea of how to communicate with them and manage them. There is also something to be said for hiring a diverse workforce who can meet the needs of a more diverse clientele or managers who can relate to a larger number of different kinds of people in the rank and file.
Change hearts and minds instead of laws.
Yes, there can be affirmative action. But this is considered to be needed . . . because of how white privilege does exist.
I have stayed out of work so someone else could get a job.Would you ever be willing to forgo your job to a less qualified minority? You affirmative action supporters never seem to want to give up your jobs or college admissions to people of color who aren't as qualified as yourselves.
The question is phrased wrong.
It shouldn't be "Does it exist?", but rather "To what extent does it exist, and is it systemic?"
Obviously, one would have to blind to suggest that it doesn't exist at all. There are going to be individual police officers, hiring managers, judges, etc... who hold secret biases and allow that to impact their decision making.
To deny the disparities in certain realms would be wearing a pretty big pair of blinders. However, it doesn't exist to the extent and impact that the far left claims it does which they claim in order to be able to gain leverage in passing certain types of policies.
If it's just a simple unconscious bias then...
1. We can't possibly know the extent of it's impact.
2. It's not fixable. All research indicates unconscious biases can't be consciously affected.
Correct, that was my point.
Obviously there are hiring managers who may have a bias and allow that to impact their decision making, but that's not something we can legislate for, and hardly validates the claim of some sort of "systemic issue". It's very tough to prove intent with certain types of decisions.
That was why I mentioned that it's not as simple as a "yes or no" question like the poll indicates.
There are certain areas still left in our country where Black people have it tougher than White people, and I'm sympathetic to that reality...but it's not in any areas where we can effectively address it from a legislative standpoint.
common sense says that extended families would be far superior to nuclear families
Research supports this to some extent. But research also shows that the difference between kids raised in two parent families and single parent families disappears when economics are controlled for. SO its really about financial security rather than number of parents.
Cooper, M., Pugh, A.J. Families Across the Income Spectrum: A Decade in Review 2020 Journal of Marriage and Family
Browne, A.P., Battle, J.Black Family Structure and Educational Outcomes: the Role of Household Structure and Intersectionality 2018 Journal of African American Studies
Amato P et al Single-parent households and children’s educational achievement: A state-level analysis 2015 Journal of Social Science Research
Glad you asked - but I already posted an example of such in post 56.
For some reason various posts seem to be ignoring it. Or blaming the victim.
I read your link. It make some rather gross assumptions without factoring in the actual resumes; like where they went to school, GPAs, and prior experience.
Can you quote which sections of the study describe these assumptions and what specifically you disagree with about them?
Because minority job seekers tend to respond to diversity statements with greater racial transparency, they may be especially likely to experience disadvantage when applying to employers that emphasize their commitment to diversity.
Omitting experience
In the real world I think people... want to have like an awesome black worker but they want one who they feel like fits within a certain box and like very much will conform and like lay low and just kind of do what’s expected of them and they’re not necessarily looking for the outspoken like political radical person. ...So I feel like to say that you’re part of [or]a member of the minority business and entrepreneur group is a different thing from saying like,“oh,I’m the political action chair of the Black Students Association.”
No data provided to back up claim; over generalization and vague.
Table 1 missing on page 10
From page 12, there is no reason to list being a part of civic/social groups on a resume.
As for the other reasons listed, you could literally remove the racial language/designations and it still apply, example
No idea what your point is here or how a direct quote from an interviewed subject means the paper is making assumptions rather than looking at real data points.
Being black I know the cops will not likely give me a tough time eitherI voted Yes. Being white, i know theres a good chance if i get pulled over that the cop will be strictly business and not give me a tough time.
That's an economic advantage, not racial one.I received a better education where i grew up then minorities did who live in Hartford which is only 10 to 15 minutes from where i live. Better education means more job opportunities
Naaw there are far more whites in prison than blacks.The judicial system is biased. Despite the fact that the black population is i think less then a quarter of Americas total population, there are far more blacks in prison then there are whites
Again; economic privilege not racial.If im driving through the city its possible that i might see 8 or 9 people who are hispanic or black before i see a white person. They live in a far more dangerous environment then i do
I think it was Candace Owes said it best when she saidRacism and oppression do most certainly exist in America
Does white privilege exist? Yes; but so does black privilege, brown privilege, male, female, gay, straight, tall short, and countless other privileges exist. I believe whatever it is about you that distinguishes you from another person will at times be to your advantage, and other times will be to your disadvantage. The problem is when some people will only see advantages in others without seeing the advantage he has, but only think he has disadvantages.Imagine this: there is an unprivileged white student who lives in a trailer park. Despite his lower socio-economic status, he does well in school and scores high on the SAT/ACT.
Meanwhile there is a a privileged black student whose parents are millionaires. Despite having access to all sorts of resources, he does okay in school and scores not as high on the SAT/ACT as the white trailer park student.
Both of these students apply to the same university. The less qualified, privileged black gets accepted, but the more qualified, unprivileged white gets rejected.
That's how affirmative action works in the United States. It purports to exist to even the playing field and help disadvantaged people of color, but in reality it discriminates against white people, including genuinely disadvantaged white people. It's very unfair. And people say "white privilege" exists.
Here is another example. In the NFL 70% of the athletes are black. No one is saying we should have more diversity in the NFL and implement quotas for more white, Hispanic, and Asian players. Meanwhile 75% of all NFL coaches are white, and people are saying that is a major problem that needs to be fixed by creating incentives for teams to hire less qualified coaches of color. You can read about it here: NFL owners table proposal incentivizing hires of minority coaches, GMs (usatoday.com)
So let me get this straight... White privilege purports to exists in the US. Yet everyone thinks it's okay when 70% of NFL players are black, but having 75% of all NFL coaches being white is somehow a problem that needs to be corrected. Are you kidding me?
Both examples I listed sound like black privilege.
If there was anything that could demonstrate that white privilege exists in the U.S., last week's storming of the Capitol Building was it.
How does that equate to White privilege? Are you assuming there were only white people in the crowd?If there was anything that could demonstrate that white privilege exists in the U.S., last week's storming of the Capitol Building was it.
Only? No. The vast majority that I saw looked pretty white though.How does that equate to White privilege? Are you assuming there were only white people in the crowd?
The vast majority of BLM protesters rioting in Seattle and Portland looked pretty white also.Only? No. The vast majority that I saw looked pretty white though.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?