Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Noah's flood was a shadow and a type of the flood that took place 200 million years ago when Pangea was destroyed. Science helps us to better understand what we read about Noah in our Bible. The Bible is absolute truth and science can verify that. Just like the Bible helps us to verify what is true Science and what is not true Science.The "Science method" does not support a worldwide flood.
Weez aw idjits an lars, aint we?You are openly admitting that you lied? Or perhaps you do not know what a poe is.
How has science verified that Noah lived 200 million years ago?Noah's flood was a shadow and a type of the flood that took place 200 million years ago when Pangea was destroyed. Science helps us to better understand what we read about Noah in our Bible. The Bible is absolute truth and science can verify that. Just like the Bible helps us to verify what is true Science and what is not true Science.
Science can't verify Noah lived 4000 years ago ... let alone 200 million.How has science verified that Noah lived 200 million years ago?
I don't rely on science to support the Bible.So much for your "Science method" supporting bible stories, then.
Is this your pastor?I don't rely on science to support the Bible.
And I'll quote my pastor:
"Some say they found Pharaoh's chariot at the bottom of the Red Sea. If you get excited about this [leans forwards and shouts:] SHAME ON YOU! WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU!? ISN'T THE FACT THAT GOD SAID IT GOOD ENOUGH! DO YOU HAVE TO RELY ON SCIENCE TO SUPPORT YOUR FAITH!!!?"
Weez aw idjits an lars, aint we?
Science does not try to verify the year that Christ was born. The author of Luke got caught making up a story. That is not "science's" problem, That is a problem for the Bible.Science can't verify Noah lived 4000 years ago ... let alone 200 million.
Science can't verify the year that Christ was born.
Science is myopic.
Okay ... this constitutes a major change in direction that I don't wish to go.Is this your pastor?
When did they give up? when they gave up looking for evidence of a global flood?Science does not try to verify the year that Christ was born.
What do you mean "give up"? They found evidence to the contrary over 200 years ago. All of the evidence found since then only confirms those earlier findings.When did they give up? when they gave up looking for evidence of a global flood?
2 Kings 2:17 And when they urged him till he was ashamed, he said, Send. They sent therefore fifty men; and they sought three days, but found him not.
This is one of the first things I experienced when I joined here.What do you mean "give up"? They found evidence to the contrary over 200 years ago.
I'd like to believe you, but I can't.This is one of the first things I experienced when I joined here.
People were saying there was no evidence of a global flood; until I started asking them when was the last time they looked.
Then they changed their tune from THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF THE FLOOD to EVIDENCE SAYS THERE WAS NO FLOOD.
One cannot ignore the creation and creator without evidence.You don't seem to understand. The burden of proof is upon those that claim that there was a "creator" and a "creation" in the first place. Not jumping to conclusions without any valid support is not "omitting".
When have they ever declared that "there is no God"?
They simply cannot assume such claims either way without evidence.
Once again you are merely projecting your beliefs.
The real question is whether so called science and it's blind adherents of the faith are acquainted with realty, or some demonic alternate delusional state?It really doesn't matter what I say about the bible, it's either true, or it isn't. The question is, what does reality suggest.
Wrong, if anyone wants to claim that anything exists the burden of proof is upon the one making a positive claim. In proper science one does not make a positive claim without evidence. Also one does not pay attention to a claim that has no evidence.One cannot ignore the creation and creator without evidence.
Don't claim you are acquainted with reality as some defense for the faith based plethora of fables from the dark vaults of so called science.I don't even know what this means. Sorry boss.
Do you claim the past was the same laws and nature on earth? We wait. (hint, science does)Wrong, if anyone wants to claim that anything exists the burden of proof is upon the one making a positive claim.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?