Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Then you shouldn’t have any problem providing a list of peer-reviewed articles published by Project Steve members. There was no such list in your earlier posting.
If you simply read the story, there's no sign of Satan. It's just a snake. It's possible that the author was thinking of the snake as representing something more, but you can't say "read this" and expect us to find Satan in the text.
I suppose I could, though it would be an extremely daunting task. I'm not sure that I even have the mental fortitude to scroll through the massive list, let alone scroll through all of their peer reviewed articles.
Ill list the first few for example:
List of Steves | National Center for Science Education
Stephen T. Abedon
Stephen T. Abedon - Google Scholar Citations
I wouldn't dare copy and paste all of the publications, but just glancing through we can see that he has many peer reviewed articles.
Steve Abel
Steven M. Abel - Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
Steven G. Ackleson
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Steven_Ackleson
I don't really have anything to prove other than what we already know, that 95+% of scientists accept biological evolution, and that there are vastly large numbers of publications in support of the theory, including by scientists named Steve.
If I really wanted to, I could literally go through all 1,400+ Steve's, but I don't think it would tell me much more than what I already know. And of the 1,400 Steve's, collectively they probably have tens of thousands of peer reviewed publications (or at least over 10,000.
And I understand that not all articles written are in peer reviewed journals, but the above links list peer reviewed journals as well. For example:
The roles of the bacteriophage T4 r genes in lysis inhibition and fine-structure genetics: a new perspective
P Paddison, ST Abedon, HK Dressman, K Gailbreath, J Tracy, E Mosser, ...
Genetics 148 (4), 1539-1550, 1998
Why bacteriophage encode exotoxins and other virulence factors
ST Abedon, JT LeJeune
Evolutionary Bioinformatics 1, 117693430500100001, 2005
These are two articles listed for the first Steve (of many that I could copy and paste, if I really wanted to). And they are peer reviewed.
If my name was Steve, I'd join that list too.
Scientists might lie ( rarely) or be mistaken but they’re usually found out eventually.
Here’s what chimpanzees look like if they have no hair. This guy has alopecia so he’s lost his hair but other than that he’s normal and healthy. Denial is a river in Egypt for people who don’t accept that humans are great apesView attachment 278170
Interesting that the author is an adjunct professor at two universities but isn’t full-time.
My point is the story doesn't call it a snake. It's a serpent which was not a snake. It was something else.If you simply read the story, there's no sign of Satan. It's just a snake. It's possible that the author was thinking of the snake as representing something more, but you can't say "read this" and expect us to find Satan in the text.
The entire biography of Jesus is about as far fetched a story as you can get. If I believed only in what's obviously true I would immediately reject his life as an impossible lie.Right, but we should be fools because of our confidence in God, not because we refuse to believe things that are obviously true. It it were just evolution, the damage would be limited, but it seems that once you accept the idea that people who spend their lives trying to be objective are actually engaged in a conspiracy against Christians, the results aren't limited to evolution. It starts to extend to global warming, vaccines, sexual orientation, and all kinds of other things. Not all conservative Christians have all of these problems, but few limit their rejection of truth to evolution.
Does anyone remember Frances Shaeffer? When I was younger, he was a big voice among evangelicals. This was the period when evangelicals were accusing "liberals" of "postmodernism," an unwillingness to accept objective truth. At the time I dismissed this. I'm starting to think he had a point, but was looking in the wrong direction.
What's worse, the problem is getting worse. Vaccines were fairly uncontroversial until recently. Even the flat earth is making a comeback.
It means, at least in the US, that he isn't a highly regarded faculty member.and so ????
It means, at least in the US, that he isn't a highly regarded faculty member.
Yes.does that matter?
Here’s what chimpanzees look like if they have no hair. This guy has alopecia so he’s lost his hair but other than that he’s normal and healthy. Denial is a river in Egypt for people who don’t accept that humans are great apesView attachment 278170
Here’s what chimpanzees look like if they have no hair. This guy has alopecia so he’s lost his hair but other than that he’s normal and healthy. Denial is a river in Egypt for people who don’t accept that humans are great apesView attachment 278170View attachment 278182
Perhaps things are different in Australia. In the US adjuncts are not that highly regarded. Too bad because I’ve known some good ones, but I’ve also known lots who are not that good.
Well of course you and I both know that nothing is ever proven in science with respect to theories. Even the theory of plate tectonics is not proven (as obvious as it is to be true).
Did I mention Theistic evolution?
Here it is:
I actually really like the natural history museum in new York by the way. I've been to many museums and have looked at many fossil collections and presentations and the museum in new York probably has the best collection of any museum potentially in the US. Assuming their models originate from their own collection at least.
It's a pretty thorough museum, so much respect for the makers of this video.
. He looks like a human bodybuilder gym rat except for the face .I don't look like this (perhaps you do) ... nor do I know any human being that does look like this.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?