• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Do you believe in Hell and why?/why not?

Status
Not open for further replies.

daydreamergurl15

Daughter of the King
Dec 11, 2003
3,639
423
✟30,656.00
Faith
Christian
Yes, I believe it because the Word said so.

When Christ was explaining judgment day to the disciples, In His explanation the "Son of Man" said to those on this left "Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels." and to those on His right He said "Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world;"... Christ also finished saying this:

"And these will go away into everlasting punishment but the righteous into eternal life."

Matthew 25: 33-34, 41, 46

That's enough for me!
 
Upvote 0

dollarsbill

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2012
6,676
147
✟7,746.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Gehenna is not "Hell", Gehenna is the Valley of Hinnom outside of Jerusalem. Look at how it says "Whole Body", if these verses supported the traditional view of hell, they would not say the body goes to hell. The traditional (false) view is that the soul goes to hell, not the body.
And that's your opinion. But you surely aren't saying all those translations I quoted are wrong and you are correct?
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
And that's your opinion. But you surely aren't saying all those translations I quoted are wrong and you are correct?
No. I'm saying all of those translations are repeats of one translation. Are you saying that all of those translations are correct and the original greek is incorrect? Are you saying that there are dead bodies in hell, right now, burning alive and they will burn alive forever while they are dead? Do you actually believe the bible says this?
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Yes, I believe it because the Word said so.

When Christ was explaining judgment day to the disciples, In His explanation the "Son of Man" said to those on this left "Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels." and to those on His right He said "Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world;"... Christ also finished saying this:

"And these will go away into everlasting punishment but the righteous into eternal life."

Matthew 25: 33-34, 41, 46

That's enough for me!
I believe that too! Except it isn't "everlasting punishment" it is "eternal punishment." Death is the eternal punishment. Death is the opposite of eternal life, not eternal life in hell.
 
Upvote 0

dollarsbill

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2012
6,676
147
✟7,746.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No. I'm saying all of those translations are repeats of one translation. Are you saying that all of those translations are correct and the original greek is incorrect?
I'm saying they are quite consistent with the NT teachings of punishment in the eternal fire.
Are you saying that there are dead bodies in hell, right now, burning alive and they will burn alive forever while they are dead? Do you actually believe the bible says this?
No, they are quite alive and in agony. Jesus didn't make up horror stories to scare us. He was simply warning us.

Luke 16:22-28
22 The rich man also died and was buried. 23 And being in torments in Hades, he lifted up his eyes and saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. 24 Then he cried and said, 'Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.' 25 But Abraham said, 'Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things; but now he is comforted and you are tormented. 26 And besides all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed, so that those who want to pass from here to you cannot, nor can those from there pass to us.' 27 Then he said, 'I beg you therefore, father, that you would send him to my father's house, 28 for I have five brothers, that he may testify to them, lest they also come to this place of torment.'
 
Upvote 0

daydreamergurl15

Daughter of the King
Dec 11, 2003
3,639
423
✟30,656.00
Faith
Christian
I believe that too! Except it isn't "everlasting punishment" it is "eternal punishment." Death is the eternal punishment. Death is the opposite of eternal life, not eternal life in hell.
What's the difference between those words?
"It is said of "everlasting/eternal punishment" elsewhere in scripture and it's also said "eternal life and everlasting life" in Scripture as well. That word "eternal/everlasting" gives an impression of being in a state for all of time. Whether that state is punishment or life, Scripture tells us it's for everlasting/eternal.

The Scripture doesn't say "eternal/everlasting DEATH" it says "eternal punishment". We can't use DEATH on earth the same as using DEATH when it comes to the Spiritual realm. Because we are told that man will die a physical death... When looking at Luke 16, whether you consider it a parable or an actual event, we are told that BOTH men died and yet, we see the man in Hades speaking and wanting water, showing us that whatever "life" looks like in the Spiritual world, it exist after "death" in the physical world.


Hebrews 9:27
And as it is appointed for men to die once, but after this the judgment,​

Paul in 1 Corinthians 15:46 said
However, the spiritual is not first, but the natural, and afterwards the spiritual.​

EDIT: I also wanted to add this:
The rich man said "I am tormented in this flame" in Luke 16:24, which echos the punishment that the Son of Man said to those on His left "Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels." in Matthew 25:41.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man is a parable, not a news account of events in Hell. Also Hell isn't even mentioned at all in this parable. It's Hades.
I'm saying they are quite consistent with the NT teachings of punishment in the eternal fire.
This is not NT teaching. The wages of sin is death. The passages that talk about fire talk about completely consuming whatever is put into the fire, not torturing it in the fire.
 
Upvote 0

Sadalmelik

Well-Known Member
Dec 25, 2011
1,191
39
raleigh nc
✟1,730.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I have no doubt that is true. Jesus was using it as an illustration of the eternal fire. Hell.

Matthew 10:28
28 "Do not fear those who kill the body but are unable to kill the soul; but rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.



happy you brought that verse up, let me ask you this, do you think God cant or wont be able to kill both the body and soul in hell.....He must have said this for a reason, no? some will say, well HE is just saying He can do that, doesnt mean He is going to....my arguement is that makes no sense....

1st God doesnt just throw out words for no reason, He uses them for purpose, 2nd, He could have said anything, like fear Him who is able to burn you in hell for all eternity with no end, He did not choose those words, they would have been a bit more fitting since you believe the doctrine of hell is eternal suffering and burning in hellfire....dont you agree? and 3rd, there is no purpose to putting anyone into a fire furnace for all eternity, what would be the purpose of that....?
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
happy you brought that verse up, let me ask you this, do you think God cant or wont be able to kill both the body and soul in hell.....He must have said this for a reason, no? some will say, well HE is just saying He can do that, doesnt mean He is going to....my arguement is that makes no sense....

1st God doesnt just throw out words for no reason, He uses them for purpose, 2nd, He could have said anything, like fear Him who is able to burn you in hell for all eternity with no end, He did not choose those words, they would have been a bit more fitting since you believe the doctrine of hell is eternal suffering and burning in hellfire....dont you agree? and 3rd, there is no purpose to putting anyone into a fire furnace for all eternity, what would be the purpose of that....?
Good point Jrog. Why would Jesus say God is able to DESTROY body and soul in Gehenna if He is actually not going to DESTROY body and soul but keep them eternally undestroyed and ungoing torture?

If Jesus meant want these people SAY He meant, why didn't Jesus say "Fear not the one who can kill the body, but rather fear the one who will torture your body and soul forever in Hell-Fire"? The simple reason is that the Hell-Fire Preachers are mistaken about what the bible says.
 
Upvote 0

Whisper of Hope

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2011
1,874
519
✟27,000.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The simple reason is that the Hell-Fire Preachers are mistaken about what the bible says.

Your statement can be changed to represent the opposite:

The simple reason is that the Annihilation Preachers are mistaken about what the bible says.
 
Upvote 0

PaladinValer

Traditional Orthodox Anglican
Apr 7, 2004
23,587
1,245
44
Myrtle Beach, SC
✟30,305.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Gehenna was a literal place on Earth, but it was commonly also used metaphorically for a place of punishment.

Sheol was divided into two places: Paradise, or Abraham's Bosom, and Gehenna. It is true that Judaism and Jews today and then didn't have a concept of hell as Christians do, but this was their belief.

Christians have historically accepted the above but also take believe sheol to be a foretaste of things to come. Hell therefore does exist. Annihilationism is an unhistoric belief that is quite heterodox and defies both Holy Writ and Holy Tradition.
 
Upvote 0

dollarsbill

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2012
6,676
147
✟7,746.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man is a parable, not a news account of events in Hell. Also Hell isn't even mentioned at all in this parable. It's Hades.
Why would Jesus make up such a DETAILED account? This is about punishment in the fire. It is consistent with the NT.
This is not NT teaching. The wages of sin is death. The passages that talk about fire talk about completely consuming whatever is put into the fire, not torturing it in the fire.
Why would God reward the wicked by destroying them? He won't.

Revelation 14:9-11
9 Then another angel, a third one, followed them, saying with a loud voice, "If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand, 10 he also will drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is mixed in full strength in the cup of His anger; and he will be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. 11 "And the smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever; they have no rest day and night, those who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name."
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Gehenna was a literal place on Earth, but it was commonly also used metaphorically for a place of punishment.

Sheol was divided into two places: Paradise, or Abraham's Bosom, and Gehenna. It is true that Judaism and Jews today and then didn't have a concept of hell as Christians do, but this was their belief.

Christians have historically accepted the above but also take believe sheol to be a foretaste of things to come. Hell therefore does exist. Annihilationism is an unhistoric belief that is quite heterodox and defies both Holy Writ and Holy Tradition.
The wages of sin is death. Any tradition that denies this defies "Holy Writ". If you say the result of sin is to be burned alive forever in hell when you are dead, then you are defying "Holy Writ" with your traditions.

I don't care that christians have historically accepted hell. What matters is the truth and what the bible says. People have historically acceopted that the earth is flat, that doesn't make it true.
 
Upvote 0

daydreamergurl15

Daughter of the King
Dec 11, 2003
3,639
423
✟30,656.00
Faith
Christian
The parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man is a parable, not a news account of events in Hell. Also Hell isn't even mentioned at all in this parable. It's Hades.

This is not NT teaching. The wages of sin is death. The passages that talk about fire talk about completely consuming whatever is put into the fire, not torturing it in the fire.

Regardless if you consider it a parable...it is a earthly story to tell us about a heavenly meaning. And even if it's Hades, we've learned something about the place of "Hades" a place where there is a flame that is tormenting those there. But not only that, we are then met with another place of torment with flames....even in the parable we can't get out of that fact that there is a place of torment.

But....let's say you're right, and say that this verse is speaking about Hades only which have no baring on what "a place called hell" would be like. Let's look at Matthew 25:41, how then do we justify the verse that the Son of Man said "....into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels..." You can't hide behind the idea that this is a parable because it's not. Jesus is telling His disciples what will happen during the end of times.. We also have MANY more scriptures of Christ speaking of "eternal punishment" and they are not in the context of a parable. But to harp on the idea that Matthew 25:21-46 is not a parable, we must go back to Daniel's prophecy of the end of times he said..
".....every one who is found written in the book. And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, some to shame and everlasting contempt." --Daniel 12:1 (end), 2​
"Sleep" is another way of saying "physical death" but Daniel speaks of those who are "sleep" that they will wake up and some will go into life and others into contempt, it's the same thing that the Son of Man said in Matthew 25.

The wages of sin is death...hence the reason why we will all die.
But Christ forgave us of our sins, but death is still a physical consequence not a spiritual one. However, Christ's sacrifice on the cross subsided the wrath of God that we should all be punished forever. But one must accept that grace because we are told that iniquity will not inherit the Kingdom of God. Christ is our Redeemer, but we also have a part in that which is acceptance...It has nothing to do with works, it has everything to do with faith and obedience.

If you use the idea that "wages of sin is death and therefore no one will see hell because Christ died for the sins of the world" then how do you understand Christ's sacrifice when people STILL die on the earth? You can't. You make the assumption that there is something after physical death. This is where judgment comes in. If everyone would have the same verdict why does the Son of Man said to His left, "Depart from Me" but says to His right "Come, you blessed of My Father inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world"? How do you rectify the scriptures that said that "it was appointed for men to die once and AFTERWARDS judgment" or that "the natural comes first then the spiritual?" Why do you throw all the verses away that speaks of "eternal punishment" as if to say "hey it's only a parable, therefore it doesn't mean a place where there is everlasting punishment because death is that punishment"? Physical death is the consequence of sins, but I don't think the Spiritual realm works that way. Can one even die in the Spiritual realm? I don't know we're not given the answer to that.

And where in scripture is this notion found
The passages that talk about fire talk about completely consuming whatever is put into the fire, not torturing it in the fire.
Besides the verses in Luke 16, we are not truly given a glimpse of what hell will be like.....
And I truly don't understand your point because the Scripture also speaks of that place where there will be "weeping and gnashing of teeth" which would indicate someone is being tortured. And before you think of a light-bulb moment and you find that "weeping and gnashing of teeth" is said in only parables (even if in parables it doesn't negate the idea that there is a place because that is what Christ is trying to explain to us).... take a look at Matthew 8:12 of which it's not, that's the verse I'm referring too.


EDIT: I have to go, if you by any chance reply to me, I can't reply back. I am without internet and have been for a while so it's taking me a long while to even look and reply to anything here.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Markus6

Veteran
Jul 19, 2006
4,039
347
40
Houston
✟29,534.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Gehenna was a literal place on Earth, but it was commonly also used metaphorically for a place of punishment.

Sheol was divided into two places: Paradise, or Abraham's Bosom, and Gehenna. It is true that Judaism and Jews today and then didn't have a concept of hell as Christians do, but this was their belief.

Christians have historically accepted the above but also take believe sheol to be a foretaste of things to come. Hell therefore does exist. Annihilationism is an unhistoric belief that is quite heterodox and defies both Holy Writ and Holy Tradition.
It may be just my ignorance but I don't know of any Christians -from the NT and throughout histroy - who have hoped to be with Abraham when they die. Our hope is to be with Christ. The place also tends be to be different, we don't talk about going to hades or sheol - with Christ would imply in heaven! Of course we then think the whole aim is to go to heaven when we die and forget about the whole resurrection thing...
 
Upvote 0

dollarsbill

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2012
6,676
147
✟7,746.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
happy you brought that verse up, let me ask you this, do you think God cant or wont be able to kill both the body and soul in hell.....He must have said this for a reason, no? some will say, well HE is just saying He can do that, doesnt mean He is going to....my arguement is that makes no sense....
He said to FEAR. There would be no need to fear if it would destroy. The wicked will certainly wish they were destroyed.
1st God doesnt just throw out words for no reason, He uses them for purpose, 2nd, He could have said anything, like fear Him who is able to burn you in hell for all eternity with no end, He did not choose those words, they would have been a bit more fitting since you believe the doctrine of hell is eternal suffering and burning in hellfire....dont you agree? and 3rd, there is no purpose to putting anyone into a fire furnace for all eternity, what would be the purpose of that....?
The words eternal, unquenchable, everlasting and forever are used for the punishment in the fire in the NT. Does eternal life end?
 
Upvote 0

dollarsbill

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2012
6,676
147
✟7,746.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You seem very confused. If someone is destroyed, they are not being rewarded.

Did the Navy Seals "reward" Osama Bin Laden by shooting him in the head?
The wicked will wish God had destroyed them. That would be reward in comparison.
 
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
249,106
114,203
✟1,378,064.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
I am about to engage in some serious studying.

First subject: Hell.

The conventional idea of Hell is a place of eternal punishment for those who don't accept Jesus.
This is something that I find hard to accept. I'm interested in people's opinions and texts from the Bible...or suggestions on what I should study

Is that because you disagree with the Bible?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.