Sigh. One more post. Yes there is such a thing as "proof" in science. A paternity test can give proof, airplane pilots want proof that their vehicles will work and get it, and there can be MRI scans that give proof of this and that. The list of proofs in science is endless. How would you think a policeman would react if his radar showed you were over the speed limit and you told him "There is no such thing as proof in science, like the science in your radar equipment." Not to mention what a judge would think.
We all need time to learn real science and real logic and we are always having illogic and pseudo science thrown at us. Nothing personal, I know you are trying to be helpful, but a statement like that there is no such thing as proof in science is why I say people keep acting like they understand science, but really are having problems even with the basics. That is how evolution is accepted so easily.
"Keep in mind that theories are provisional." Gee, I'm so glad you bothered to tell that to this presumed to ignert fundie. Again, I know you mean well, but, again, sigh.
No, P.E. has no evidence. It says things, by golly, just happened so fast that we don't have the evidence for evolution that we need. You can't prove a negative.
You seem like a nice sort. If you are ever interested in taking a good hard look outside the box, I suggest Crevo Rants first, maybe starting with the very funny one called SEX.
Best wishes and bye.
