• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Do creationists accept the evolution of plants?

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
Yes, the Godless Darwinists are continually attempting to change the focus from creation and evolution but it's not going to work.

You define "creation" as the creation of anything, so that includes all of science. It is YOU who has made the focus all of science.

cre·a·tion
noun \krē-ˈā-shən\

: the act of making or producing something that did not exist before : the act of creating something

: something new that is made or produced : something that has been created

: everything in the world

Creation - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

That is creationism, as you define it. It includes EVERYTHING. You are the one who has brought the focus to things outside of evolution by including every aspect of the universe in your definition of atheistic creationism.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
Show me where I have defined atheistic creationism is "all of science".

Every time you define creationism by using the definition for creation:

cre·a·tion
noun \krē-ˈā-shən\

: the act of making or producing something that did not exist before : the act of creating something

: something new that is made or produced : something that has been created

: everything in the world

Creation - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Yes, the Godless Darwinists are continually attempting to change the focus from creation and evolution but it's not going to work.

Once again, this is a fail on your part. What is wrong with the theory of evolution not referring to gods? No other sciences refer to gods so they too should be atheistic by your standards.

We are only asking that you be consistent.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
"Evolutionism is the atheistic worldview that says life developed without God and without purpose. Instead, we agree with Christians who adhere to Intelligent Design and Creationism that the God of the Bible created the universe and all life. "​

Point out the "all of science" part.

Define "creationism".
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,664
52,517
Guam
✟5,130,427.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
How is it any different than a godless form of chemistry, a godless form of thermodynamics, or a godless form of particle physics?
It's not.

Godless is godless.
 
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
199
✟35,675.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You define "creation" as the creation of anything, so that includes all of science. It is YOU who has made the focus all of science.

cre·a·tion
noun \krē-ˈā-shən\

: the act of making or producing something that did not exist before : the act of creating something

: something new that is made or produced : something that has been created

: everything in the world

Creation - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

That is creationism, as you define it. It includes EVERYTHING. You are the one who has brought the focus to things outside of evolution by including every aspect of the universe in your definition of atheistic creationism.

Ok, you can't. I'm not surprised.
 
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
199
✟35,675.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Once again, this is a fail on your part. What is wrong with the theory of evolution not referring to gods? No other sciences refer to gods so they too should be atheistic by your standards.

We are only asking that you be consistent.

I'm only asking you to concentrate on creation and evolution.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
Ok, you can't. I'm not surprised.

I just did. You define creationism as encompassing all of science, from the creation of large molecules from smaller atoms to the creation of a heat gradient.

As usual, you have to run away from your own words. If you think I am wrong, reference a definition for "creationism". I dare you.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,664
52,517
Guam
✟5,130,427.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why is it okay to use all of those atheistic sciences but it is not okay to use atheistic evolution?
I can show you "atheistic evolution" in Wikipedia.

Can you show me "atheistic chemistry" from the same source?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
I'm only asking you to concentrate on creation and evolution.

That's because you want to hide your rejection of all of science. Sorry, not going to happen. We are focusing on what you define as atheistic creationism, which includes every single scientific theory in every field of science.
 
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
199
✟35,675.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I just did. You define creationism as encompassing all of science, from the creation of large molecules from smaller atoms to the creation of a heat gradient.

As usual, you have to run away from your own words. If you think I am wrong, reference a definition for "creationism". I dare you.

Whenever you can actually quote me concerning "all of science".
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Didn't think you could. That's because you can't.

He gave a standard definition for it. He was pointing out that you are dishonest in your definitions of words. Do you think that you are fooling anyone with your constant word-play?
 
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
199
✟35,675.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
That's because you want to hide your rejection of all of science. Sorry, not going to happen. We are focusing on what you define as atheistic creationism, which includes every single scientific theory in every field of science.

Wanna talk about the guesses and suppositions of the creation of humanity? You know, relating to the topic of this board.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
I can show you "atheistic evolution" in Wikipedia.

Can you show me "atheistic chemistry" from the same source?

What is the difference? Both propose natural mechanisms as explanations for natural phenomena. If the theory of evolution is atheistic for only proposing natural mechanisms, then so too is chemistry.
 
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
199
✟35,675.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
He gave a standard definition for it. He was pointing out that you are dishonest in your definitions of words. Do you think that you are fooling anyone with your constant word-play?

Go paraphrase something, that should keep you entertained for a bit. :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0