- Mar 2, 2017
- 2,277
- 3,110
- 37
- Country
- Sweden
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Celibate
As in Matthew 18:17?I had a good read in Gordon Fee's commentary on the verse and I agree with him, that Paul did not intend for the church to take his words literally. What Paul intends is for the man to be separated from the Christian community with its life in the Spirit and to be put out into Satan's domain, not for Satan to actually destroy him but to encourage the man to repentance when he realises what he is missing by not being in the protective environment of the Church. Paul's view of the destruction of the flesh is not death at the hands of Satan, because this wold not be in harmony with his theology. He views the destruction of the flesh in the same way as believers "crucifying the flesh". That expression does not mean that we nail ourselves to a cross to be holy, but that we deem ourselves dead to the world, but alive to Christ. Of course there is suffering involved in being separated from the life and fellowship of the Church but Paul's intention is that the man is restored to Christ by repentance and "sinning no more".
Fee brings out the difficulties in today's churches where a sinning believer can be disciplined and all he has to do is go down the road to another church. He has concerns about a church that would accept a person who is under serious discipline in another church, but that is the state of our divided modern church.
It seems that the verse, rather than involving direct punishment, it involves separating him from the good things of God in the Church so he starts to see what he is missing and the difficulties of trying to continue living in Satan's domain without the support of the local fellowship of believers. This is no excommunication which has a permanence about it, but is a measure of discipline with a readiness to accept the guy back when he repents.
Upvote
0