Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Haha, so now you think all of astronomy is wrong and the stars are not where they are (or what they are). This is worse than I thought. Try this:
Parallax - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Correct. I realize that stellar evolution is false. So I see you offer parallax as a distance measure? Do you claim it works for the pinwheel then?
lol, we've all provided stuff to support our claims, Dad, even if you don';t agree with them. How about you do the same?
Ah..so you cannot support the claim for the pinwheel distance. OK. When we observe a star on earth, we assume it exists. We assume that it exists in time as we know it and space as we know it. We would need that for linear measurements to work...right? Parallax involves time you know. Earth time. For example 6 months for different measurements in different places on our earth orbit..etc.No, parallax does not work for galaxies, they are too far away, standard candles are used for that. But parallax certainly works for stars and planets that are in the 6,000 light years range, and physics properties in all of those behave exactly how they do in the solar system.
Not if there is a different state space!
You didn't qv them in detail did you?AV, that post has no relation to what I am trying to show dad here. But FYI, your "hypothesis" of a universe being created as it is, with embedded age and history, is more logical to me than a past with different natural laws will ever be.
No you haven't. You only thought you did. It did not in any way begin to support the wild eyed claims of the false prophets of so called science.lol, we've all provided stuff to support our claims, Dad, even if you don';t agree with them. How about you do the same?
You didn't qv them in detail did you?
Let me give you the Cliffs Notes version:
Light moved at the speed of God's will back then -- today it runs much slower: C.
Your spiral galaxy means nothing.
Thanks. Looking at the absurd outcomes of the claims of the false prophets of science helps one to realize that they had a fatal flaw in their reasoning.Oh, I missed this one, now you are not only claiming a different state past on earth but also a different state space outside of our planet. This just keeps getting better.
Which came first, the Grand Canyon or the Colorado River?I can look directly at the past, with objects moving according to the same laws of momentum and gravity as they are here on Earth. We can measure the erosion and building of geological layers containing records of life's journey from millions of years ago by actually looking at it and touching it.
I don't make sense to whom? you?Yes, AV. Prove your point by linking to a post where it is pointed out that you are not making any sense.
Is this your new argument? "I don't make sense, therefore I am right?"
So show us some erosion you measured that does all of this!? Let us all look at it and be amazed. Ho hum.I can look directly at the past, with objects moving according to the same laws of momentum and gravity as they are here on Earth. We can measure the erosion and building of geological layers containing records of life's journey from millions of years ago by actually looking at it and touching it.
Suit yourself -- just don't expect us to believe it.As the person responding to your post very well put it, if light moved faster back then, the universe would be much, much older. Your's and dad's different state past means nothing.
Suit yourself -- just don't expect us to believe it.
Biblical support of a different state past: no death of man or animals; no thorns or thistles.Oh, and I am still waiting on that Biblical support for a different state past (since I already gave up on receiving a scientific one).
QV 1142, ff
Can you put it in writing; I'm not going to click on that link.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?