Meaning you see that this was in regards to v. 9, for I said in providing this quote,
As for, "Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God," (
1 John 3:9) A.T. Robertson states,...
And thus he says in the quote provided but which you also cannot see, The present active infinitive hamartanein can only mean “and he cannot go on sinning,”
as is true of hamartanei in 1Jo_3:8 and hamartanōn in 1Jo_3:6.
Why is it that you cannot see that "he cannot go on sinning" is directly addressing the verse which says "doth not commit sin," a negative, not v.8 which states the positive, "He that committeth sin is of the devil?" But since the same connotation of "sinneth" the Greek applies in 1 John 3:6 and 8, thus he states,
as is true of hamartanei in...
The
entire comment on 1John 3:9 is,
1 John 3:9
Doeth no sin (hamartian ou poiei). Linear present active indicative as in 1Jo_3:4 like hamartanei in 1Jo_3:8. The child of God does not have the habit of sin.
His seed (sperma autou). God’s seed, “the divine principle of life” (Vincent). Cf. John 1.
And he cannot sin (kai ou dunatai hamartanein). This is a wrong translation, for this English naturally means “and he cannot commit sin” as if it were kai ou dunatai hamartein or hamartēsai (second aorist or first aorist active infinitive). The present active infinitive hamartanein can only mean “and he cannot go on sinning,” as is true of hamartanei in 1Jo_3:8 and hamartanōn in 1Jo_3:6. For the aorist subjunctive to commit a sin see hamartēte and hamartēi in 1Jo_2:1.
A great deal of false theology has grown out of a misunderstanding of the tense of hamartanein here. Paul has precisely John’s idea in Rom_6:1 epimenōmen tēi hamartiāi (shall we continue in sin, present active linear subjunctive) in contrast with hamartēsōmen in Rom_6:15 (shall we commit a sin, first aorist active subjunctive).
Thus since you have a hard time even comprehending English and dismiss those who know Greek then none what you have previously posted (Above) is of any consequence. Still waiting though for what evil spirit said he did not know who A. T. Robertson was. Or were you speaking for it?