Did Men Really Walk On The Moon?

[d taylor]

Up and then back down, the arch, all rocket launches have.

 

[prodromos]

Up and then back down, the arch, all rocket launches have.

View attachment 323660​

Up, then out at a tangent into orbit. If it came back down as you claim, then where is it?

 

[JacksBratt]

Up, then out at a tangent into orbit. If it came back down as you claim, then where is it?

With a budget of 22 billion a year... they aren't going to send it somewhere where it can be seen and found out.

When want to go to a destination on a lake, that is south.. I usually head west and make a big sooping curve.... I go faster that way.... LOL

 

[prodromos]

With a budget of 22 billion a year... they aren't going to send it somewhere where it can be seen and found out.

When want to go to a destination on a lake, that is south.. I usually head west and make a big sooping curve.... I go faster that way.... LOL

Apparently Klingon cloaking devices are actually a thing according to you guys.

 

[JacksBratt]

Apparently Klingon cloaking devices are actually a thing according to you guys.

Are you aware of how big the Atlantic ocean is? No need for cloaking.. In the past.. they have totally lost airliners full of people... when they had experts looking for them... in smaller oceans.. when they knew the flight plan.

Ya... NASA doesn't need a cloaking device.. they tell the sheep that it needs to arch like that to leave the atmosphere.. and... all the sheep accept it.

 

[prodromos]

Are you aware of how big the Atlantic ocean is? No need for cloaking.. In the past.. they have totally lost airliners full of people... when they had experts looking for them... in smaller oceans.. when they knew the flight plan.

Ya... NASA doesn't need a cloaking device.. they tell the sheep that it needs to arch like that to leave the atmosphere.. and... all the sheep accept it.

It was on camera the entire launch yet nobody saw it fall into the Atlantic, so it all must have been some immense scale holographic projection, seeing as people watched it launch from many different locations.

Honestly, the things that that need to exist in order for your version of events to be possible just boggles the mind

 

[peaceful-forest]

I don't think men walked on the moon. The moon landing footage was filmed in a studio. The only star present in the film is the sun...

 

[prodromos]

I don't think men walked on the moon. The moon landing footage was filmed in a studio. The only star present in the film is the sun...

How many stars are visible during daylight hours? Any photo taken in daylight will not have a long enough exposure for stars to be visible.

 

[Yttrium]

I don't think men walked on the moon. The moon landing footage was filmed in a studio. The only star present in the film is the sun...

Yeah, they filmed it in a studio and forgot to add stars in the black sky. That makes LOTS of sense. Guess they didn't watch Star Trek, huh?

 

[Torah Keeper]

@prodromos

Look at this photo and tell me what's wrong with it. It is supposed to be Apollo 11, at an altitude of 79 miles above the moon. Can yoú not see that this is a model in a studio? If this photo is real, that shadow is hundreds of miles wide. A 6 inch wide thruster does not cast a shadow hundreds of miles wide, from 79 miles altitude, in sunlight. Explain this:

 

[prodromos]

@prodromos

Look at this photo and tell me what's wrong with it. It is supposed to be Apollo 11, at an altitude of 79 miles above the moon. Can yoú not see that this is a model in a studio? If this photo is real, that shadow is hundreds of miles wide. A 6 inch wide thruster does not cast a shadow hundreds of miles wide, from 79 miles altitude, in sunlight. Explain this:

View attachment 323942

I have no idea where that photo was taken from. Do you have a link to the original photo and its details?

 

[Torah Keeper]

I have no idea where that photo was taken from. Do you have a link to the original photo and its details?

Please notice the photo I posted contains three sources:

1. The NASA photo reference number is visible in the photo. AS11-37-5437
2. The photo was published in Phil Collins' book, "Carrying The Fire"
3. The photo was published in Ralph Rene's book, "NASA Mooned America"

I have added a link to the original photo for your convenience:

Apollo 11, Lunar Landscape (AS11- 37- 5437) | NASA – GADCOLLECTION

Apollo 11, Lunar Landscape (AS11- 37- 5437) , 1969 20 July 1969 Original photograph Vintage print 20,32 x 25,4 cm / 8 x 10 inch

www.gadcollection.com

Please, do not rely only on internet links as a final source of evidence. Books are much sturdier, and more resistant to the Ministry of Truth's propaganda machine. If you show a blooper photo like this to enough people, it mysteriously disappears from NASA's files, and they will claim it was just a hoax photo made by a conspiracy theorist. While photos such as these remain available to the public, save them. The internet is being purged of evidence.

 

[prodromos]

@prodromos

Look at this photo and tell me what's wrong with it. It is supposed to be Apollo 11, at an altitude of 79 miles above the moon. Can yoú not see that this is a model in a studio? If this photo is real, that shadow is hundreds of miles wide. A 6 inch wide thruster does not cast a shadow hundreds of miles wide, from 79 miles altitude, in sunlight. Explain this:

View attachment 323942

Found it!

It is the sillouette of the LEM's small thrusters. It is not a shadow cast on the moon's surface.
They are close to the camera which is why they are out of focus and they are on the shadow side of the LEM which is why they are dark.

 

[prodromos]

I have added a link to the original photo for your convenience

Thanks! Yours was much better than the one I found. Same explanation applies.

 

[prodromos]

From the same archive, the same thrusters in daylight

Apollo 11, Scientific experiments package (AS11- 37- 5551)

Apollo 11, Scientific experiments package (AS11- 37- 5551), 1969 20 July 1969 Original photograph Vintage print 20,32 x 25,4 cm / 8 x 10 inch

www.gadcollection.com

 

[prodromos]

That took all of 10 minutes on my laptop to figure out once I got home. This same information is available to the conspiracy theorists, so how come they couldn't figure it out?
I suspect that these people realise there is money to be made from indulging these theories. I wonder how many copies of his book Ralph Rene sold?

 

[JacksBratt]

It was on camera the entire launch yet nobody saw it fall into the Atlantic, so it all must have been some immense scale holographic projection, seeing as people watched it launch from many different locations.

Honestly, the things that that need to exist in order for your version of events to be possible just boggles the mind

It is so far away... that nobody saw where it went. The distances that are at play here go beyone eyesight.. This is by design.

 

[Torah Keeper]

@prodromos

Thanks for explaining that. I hadn't considered that it may be a silhouette. I will dump that photo in the "bad evidence" pile. I do still believe it is a model, but a silhouette is indeed a logical possibility.

I now present "Exhibit B":

Would you please give your explanation for this video?

(It is a rather short one, 14:30. Long videos are a waste of time. I prefer to get immediately to the point.)

The video depicts the CIA prompting Apollo astronauts to talk after a false 4 second delay, to make it seem like they were halfway to the moon.

And the photo of the "distant" Earth in the window is shown to be a transparent picture, placed over the window, and made to look like a distant Earth by special effects.

I await your refutation.

Blessings

 

[d taylor]

@prodromos

Thanks for explaining that. I hadn't considered that it may be a silhouette. I will dump that photo in the "bad evidence" pile. I do still believe it is a model, but a silhouette is indeed a logical possibility.

I now present "Exhibit B":

Would you please give your explanation for this video?

(It is a rather short one, 14:30. Long videos are a waste of time. I prefer to get immediately to the point.)

The video depicts the CIA prompting Apollo astronauts to talk after a false 4 second delay, to make it seem like they were halfway to the moon.

And the photo of the "distant" Earth in the window is shown to be a transparent picture, placed over the window, and made to look like a distant Earth by special effects.

I await your refutation.

Blessings

Your photo and the photo the other person posted have different areas

 

[Torah Keeper]

Your photo and the photo the other person posted have different areas

Yes, looking at the 2nd photo from prodromos, I can still see detail in the shadow side of the thruster silhouette. In the photo I provided, the thruster silhouette/shadow is 100% black. This at least shows inconsistency in the photos, which is suspicious. Why is one 100% black on the shadow side while another is backlit? If prodromos' photo showed the thruster 100% black as in the first photo, it would be more credible. Comparing the 2 photos, it does appear the one I provided is indeed a shadow, while prodomos' photo is a silhouette. But I cannot conclusively prove this. So I'm not 100% convinced of what it is either way. I decided that a silhouette was a logical possibility, but it doesn't confirm this photo is really from the moon. It may in fact still be evidence, but it's not solid indisputable evidence, so I tossed it aside and moved on to Exhibit B, the video above.

I am curious to see how prodromos explains the video.

It was on camera the entire launch yet nobody saw it fall into the Atlantic, so it all must have been some immense scale holographic projection, seeing as people watched it launch from many different locations.

Honestly, the things that that need to exist in order for your version of events to be possible just boggles the mind

I think d taylor meant that it flew far away, out of sight, and crashed in the Atlantic Ocean hundreds of miles away. Yes rocket launches are real, but where they go once they are out of sight is another thing.

I think low Earth orbit is possible, and that is the end of our current space technology. I don't think Earth is flat, nor do I think men walked on the moon.