Did Men Really Walk On The Moon?

[d taylor]

-
​

Ok so looks like they (nasa) is getting ready to fake another moon trip and landing and walk on the moon. I guess around 2024, was it this week they launched a rocket test. Did not look to see, if nasa actually launched the rocket.

The question is will they be able to fake the way these men, faked the moon walks the first time. Will the movements be the same when recorded on film. Or will they say there has been an advancement in technology and now they walk differently on the moon. If the way they move is not exactly the way they moved the first time on the moon.

 

[ozso]

-
​

Ok so looks like they (nasa) is getting ready to fake another moon trip and landing and walk on the moon. I guess around 2024, was it this week they launched a rocket test. Did not look to see, if nasa actually launched the rocket.

The question is will they be able to fake the way these men, faked the moon walks the first time. Will the movements be the same when recorded on film. Or will they say there has been an advancement in technology and now they walk differently on the moon. If the way they move is not exactly the way they moved the first time on the moon.

CGI engineers shouldn't have much trouble with that.

 

[prodromos]

Ok so looks like they (nasa) is getting ready to fake another moon trip and landing and walk on the moon. I guess around 2024, was it this week they launched a rocket test. Did not look to see, if nasa actually launched the rocket.

Hydrogen leaks from a faulty seal prevented launch again. It boggles the mind that you so readily believe that NASA is willing to pour millions into a venture that you claim is fake. Anything, no matter how ridiculous, is justified if it supports your mistaken interpretation of Scripture.

 

[Richard.20.12]

-
​

Ok so looks like they (nasa) is getting ready to fake another moon trip and landing and walk on the moon. I guess around 2024, was it this week they launched a rocket test. Did not look to see, if nasa actually launched the rocket.

The question is will they be able to fake the way these men, faked the moon walks the first time. Will the movements be the same when recorded on film. Or will they say there has been an advancement in technology and now they walk differently on the moon. If the way they move is not exactly the way they moved the first time on the moon.

Hey Einstein, they can see debris left behind from previous moon landings! Our optical tools have gotten better. I guess the conspiracy disease infects most all demographics now. Are you also going to remark on the lack of stars in the first photos from the moon? Only people that have zero knowledge of photography and contrast would mention that. (Same reason there are no stars in photos from the space station that is very close to Earth. If you could see the stars the space station would be hopelessly overexposed.)

 

[d taylor]

Hydrogen leaks from a faulty seal prevented launch again. It boggles the mind that you so readily believe that NASA is willing to pour millions into a venture that you claim is fake. Anything, no matter how ridiculous, is justified if it supports your mistaken interpretation of Scripture.

Millions to elevate man to something he is not. Just a good ole satanic deception, using man and his ego for greatness, even if it is just a lie.

 

[Richard.20.12]

Millions to elevate man to something he is not. Just a good ole satanic deception, using man and his ego for greatness, even if it is just a lie.

Its just impossible to reason with someone entrenched in a lie.

 

[JacksBratt]

-
​

Ok so looks like they (nasa) is getting ready to fake another moon trip and landing and walk on the moon. I guess around 2024, was it this week they launched a rocket test. Did not look to see, if nasa actually launched the rocket.

The question is will they be able to fake the way these men, faked the moon walks the first time. Will the movements be the same when recorded on film. Or will they say there has been an advancement in technology and now they walk differently on the moon. If the way they move is not exactly the way they moved the first time on the moon.

With the technology of today.. this should be a "walk in the park" to fake the entire moon shot.

 

[JacksBratt]

Hydrogen leaks from a faulty seal prevented launch again. It boggles the mind that you so readily believe that NASA is willing to pour millions into a venture that you claim is fake. Anything, no matter how ridiculous, is justified if it supports your mistaken interpretation of Scripture.

NASA is taking millions of dollars.. a little spent on a big rocket.. a little spent on some movie production.. CGI.... green sceens.... and the rest of the money... is profit.

 

[Petros2015]

With the technology of today.. this should be a "walk in the park" to fake the entire moon shot.

Imagine how easy it would be to fake faking the entire moon shot.

 

[d taylor]

With the technology of today.. this should be a "walk in the park" to fake the entire moon shot.

I am sure they can produce easily a fake video. My question is can they reproduce the type of movement that was seen in the first fake film footage.

I wonder if that is what they meant, when they said they lost the technology. The technology to fake it again, like in the same manner as before.

 

[JacksBratt]

Its just impossible to reason with someone entrenched in a lie.

It's impossible to argue with people who have seen movies like "Gravity".... and still think that it is impossible to fake it.

Not to mention the radiation belts.....

Especially when they think that this is men on the moon:

 

[JacksBratt]

I am sure they can produce easily a fake video. My question is can they reproduce the type of movement that was seen in the first fake film footage.

I wonder if that is what they meant, when they said they lost the technology. The technology to fake it again, like in the same manner as before.

I think that they will be much better at it and the public is much more eager to accept it. They want to believe it.

 

[prodromos]

It's impossible to argue with people who have seen movies like "Gravity".... and still think that it is impossible to fake it.

I don't know of anyone who claims it couldn't be faked, apart from the view of the launch up into orbit. That was watched by millions live and hundreds of amateurs with telescopes followed it up into orbit.

Not to mention the radiation belts.....

What about them? Have you ever had an x-ray taken, or an MRI?

Especially when they think that this is men on the moon:

The physics look spot on, given the weight of the backpack and the bulkiness of the suit restricting their range of movements.

 

[JacksBratt]

I don't know of anyone who claims it couldn't be faked, apart from the view of the launch up into orbit. That was watched by millions live and hundreds of amateurs with telescopes followed it up into orbit.

So, they fired a rocket up, up and where?

What about them? Have you ever had an x-ray taken, or an MRI?

Um, ya... and they only let you have so many in a year.. The Radiation belts are much stronger and they would be inside them too long for safety.

Also, there were astronauts who were in the space shuttle or ISS, can't remember which, that went above 400 km's and started to see light flashing in their eyes even when they were closed.

The radiation belts are a game changer and proof that they never went to the moon in that little "tin can".

The physics look spot on, given the weight of the backpack and the bulkiness of the suit restricting their range of movements.

The physics look spot on for a marionette.

 

[Enilorac]

Good grief...this claim is STILL around?

 

[Petros2015]

Good grief...this claim is STILL around?

Oh dear.
You probably don't know about the Ice Wall yet.
So the oceans don't fall off the edge
Of the Flat Earth.

 

[Lost4words]

Flat earth believers and NASA haters have been brain washed by loonies. No other way to explain their unbelievable thinking.

Anyway, everyone and their cat knows that it was a dog that was the first to walk on the moon!

 

[prodromos]

So, they fired a rocket up, up and where?

I already told you. Orbit.

Um, ya... and they only let you have so many in a year.. The Radiation belts are much stronger and they would be inside them too long for safety.

So you claim, without any figures to back you up. Ironic that you are willing to accept the existence of the Van Allen belts when it suits you, even though they are a particular phenomenon of the heliocentric globe earth model and are not in any way part of the flat earth cosmology. You seem to want to have your cake and eat it too.

The physics look spot on for a marionette.

You only see what you want to see.

 

[Chad1]

and NASA haters have been brain washed by loonies.

So do you believe in Nasa's big bang theory they provide on their website?

If not, are you saying that they lie about some things but not all?

Do you dislike or hate those that promote evolution?

 

[Lost4words]

So do you believe in Nasa's big bang theory they provide on their website?

If not, are you saying that they lie about some things but not all?

Do you dislike or hate those that promote evolution?

Woof!