Well, by all means, if all we need is to be baptized to be regenerated then our salvation is based on our works
Our salvation is based on Jesus coming into the world and dyeing on the cross so that sins may be forgiven. Baptism is what Jesus commanded his apostles to do, "Go and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the father, son, and Holy Spirit"
Baptism is regeneration not a work. We are born again in the waters of baptism, just as Jesus said we would be "you must be born of both water and spirit" This in no way says that the water is the thing that saves us, what saves us is Jesus, the water is the tool in which GOD chooses to use to have us pass from life to death. God uses this imagery through out the New Testament, especially at the cross when the centurion pierced the side of Jesus after his death, where blood and water flowed from his side. This is symbolizes us being freed by the water and blood in which we are washed clean in baptism, this also is testimony to us dyeing with Jesus in baptism and rising with him to new life. The water symbolizes regeneration, the blood symbolizes remission of sin they both symbolize that baptism is seeped in the mystery of the cross from where all salvation comes.
But again one must look at this in the light of it is a remission of original sin, a washing clean of Adams sin. I am not guilty personally of his sin so I am not going to lose salvation for his sin, but I am not born with the grace from God to "see the kingdom" because of his sin, there is a big difference in this.
We baptize infants because they are born with out the grace to enter heaven due to the sin of Adam. Jesus death on the cross was a totally free gift of freedom from original sin, the sin that holds us all bound until we become "born again." We are born again in baptism, this is in no way a work, it is claiming our inheritance as Children of God, and we are the rightful heirs.
Since infants are born with original sin (not personal sin) they too have a need for salvation if they are going to "see the kingdom" and since salvation is free and we cant earn it, I can not earn liberation from Adams sin, especially since I am not the cause of his sin, only the benefactor of his sin, it is only logical to include infants in being regenerated, it would be crazy not to. If a infant can not receive a free gift that they in no way could earn; even if they were at a age of reason, then the gift really isnt free is it? If we have to "do something" like repent or believe in order to be saved from something that we are not responsible for in the first place then how is salvation free? It then becomes something that is too be earned and not given.
When we baptize we are asked the question "what is it that you seek from Gods church" and the response is "faith!" We are seeking faith, not earning faith, there is a difference with this. We are seeking to impart faith in this infant by nurturing the free gift, we seek to impart faith in ourselves by nurturing our free gift of salvation. Baptism freely imparts faith and the Holy Spirit in a soul that has been regenerated by this sacrament. St. Paul referred to this as "We have been given the first installment of the Holy Spirit" of the promise.
Now in light of this explanation, why dont you go back and re read the post in which the text was a quote taken from the CCC, explain the Catholic doctrine of baptism.
Upvote
0